Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #597576

Re: ChatGPT

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: ChatGPT
Date	2022-12-15 10:04 -0800
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<639B61AC.34EF@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<639A0E35.C2E@ix.netcom.com> <639ACD6E.6343@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > ChatGPT looks like
> > it does a better
> > job of
> > writing programs
> > then all those
> > guys out there
> > on freelance sites.
> >
> > ChatGPT doesn't
> > ask stupid questions
> > like
> > "What do you want this for?"
> > or
> > "This looks illegal."
> >
> > ChatGPT just
> > codes for you without
> > a conscious.
> >
> > Blackhat ChatGPT
> > is cool.
> >
> > It's like asking
> > Albert Einstein,
> > "Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
> > and it might ask...
> >
> > "Do you want it to be
> > launched from a submarine or
> > a suitcase?"
> >
> > Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
> >
> > Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type
> > constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
> >
> > and ChatGPT might say:
> >
> > "Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> > air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
> > port, might very well destroy
> > the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
> >
> > GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
> >
> > Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> >
> 
> I would say that ChatGPT is today at a level
> what Google was when Google first came out...
> in those days you could do anything with Google.
> 
> For example, you can give an old Perl script
> to ChatGPT, and have it convert to Python in seconds
> what would take a human coder weeks to do...
> and for FREE!

Just as in the beginning of Goggle
everyone was 'gaming' Google.

You can game ChatGPT by
watching the words/language
it uses to explain what it
is doing.

You get better results if
you use ChatGPT language
on itself.

Also, i notice ChatGPT
has less network errors...
i guess they are in the
process of fixing it.

I would say by next year
they will implement
advertisements.


Gotta game dat too!

Who needs books
if you got ChatGPT?






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Thread

ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-14 09:56 -0800
  Re: ChatGPT patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-12-14 10:09 -0800
  Re: ChatGPT Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 18:20 +0000
    Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 13:41 -0600
  Re: ChatGPT Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 18:23 +0000
  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-14 23:31 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-15 10:04 -0800
  Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 23:33 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 23:39 -0800
  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-21 11:14 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-30 16:51 -0800
      Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 19:14 -0600
      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 17:10 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 17:38 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 19:21 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 20:26 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:30 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-02 06:50 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:18 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-02 09:19 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:41 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 22:28 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:39 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:36 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:39 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 18:06 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 20:28 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:53 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:20 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 23:50 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:25 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 19:26 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 10:33 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 12:35 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 21:11 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 14:00 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 14:51 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 15:21 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-20 10:53 -0800
  Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 14:15 -0800

csiph-web