Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #592537

Re: a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind...

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject Re: a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind...
Date Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:06:08 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Lines 148
Message-ID <6335ECA0.3DC3@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <6331EEEE.5DBC@ix.netcom.com> <6335472D.3155@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Info reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bdbd7c150b729bdb21bc31ff8182ce4f"; logging-data="775306"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/jQ+PHCzWOOGl2r9YbQ3ynSDSLBIP61FU="
Cancel-Lock sha1:rsnYxRXk+5tyusO/EpkqM2dZ41c=
X-Antivirus Avast (VPS 220929-6, 09/29/2022), Outbound message
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
Xref csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:592537 sci.physics:862334 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:2596933

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


What is even funnier...
I mean really really funnier! Is the

the whole scientific community knows that
all the top scientist were involved in the
Manhattan Project and building the Atomic bomb,
including hundreds if not thousands working on the
atomic bomb....EXCEPT
EXCEPT
one scientist named Albert Einstein!

"Never underestimate the power of denial"



dats funny!


its a psychological defense mechanism in which confrontation with a with reality is avoided by denying the existence of the  reality



"Never underestimate the power of denial"




in May 1943. "The next month Einstein came up with his first suggestion,
 a way to make a torpedo detonate just as it passed beneath a ship’s
 keel." ... 



".. I have never taken
  part in work of a military-technical nature..." -Albert Einstein


"In August Einstein turned his attention to torpedoes detonated by
 contact rather than magnetic impulses. He explained why the explosive
 charge in such torpedoes should be placed at the front instead of the
rear..."




"If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my
formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein  


So, ...Albert Einstein continued on with developing
New and More effective High Explosives for the
Navy, AND the Army, AND the Air Force...that were used
in the war against Germany and Japan, the
Korean war and the Vietnam war. 


"I asked Einstein whether he would be willing to
become a consultant for the Navy in general,
and for me, in the field of high explo-
sives research, in particular. Einstein was
tremendously pleased about the offer,
and very happily gave his consent."



".. I have never taken
  part in work of a military-technical nature..." -Albert Einstein, January 23, 1950




The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Now, here is the funny part...
> 
> On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter".. I have never taken
>  part in work of a military-technical nature..."
> 
> Albert Einstein was always very careful with 'words' he used so he can
> get out of it.
> 
> ".. I have never taken
>  part in work of a military-technical nature..."
> 
> "in work"????
> 
> Is that like the opposite of "out work"?? Or what 'out work' means
> today...remote work?
> 
> So, he is saying "I've done remote work of a military-technical
> nature..."
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > in May 1943. The next month Einstein came up with his first suggestion,
> > a way to make a torpedo detonate just as it passed beneath a ship’s
> > keel. In Einstein’s scheme a pair of electromagnetic coils at the front
> > and rear of the torpedo would be connected in series with an
> > electromagnet between them. The two coils would have opposite magnetic
> > polarity, so when the torpedo was far from the target ship, the induced
> > current between them would be zero for reasons of symmetry. As the
> > torpedo approached the ship, the hull’s magnetic field would start to be
> > felt. Since the field would be stronger at the front of the torpedo than
> > at the rear, it would induce a current. Then when the torpedo passed
> > beneath the keel, the fields from either side of the hull would cancel
> > each other out, and the current would briefly dip to zero, setting off
> > the detonator.
> >
> > In August Einstein turned his attention to torpedoes detonated by
> > contact rather than magnetic impulses. He explained why the explosive
> > charge in such torpedoes should be placed at the front instead of the
> > rear and suggested a protruding hollow tip, possibly armed with a
> > projectile, to increase the likelihood of puncturing the hull instead of
> > just shaking it. But contact detonation raised a new problem: The force
> > of a violent collision with the hull could crush the head of the torpedo
> > before detonation was completed.
> >
> > In October Einstein suggested a possible way around this difficulty: Put
> > the explosive in the rear of the torpedo and rotate it after impact to
> > bring the business end closer. At first he thought the increased water
> > speed right next to a ship’s moving hull would do the trick. Two months
> > later, though, he decided that even if his idea could be made to work,
> > the turning forces would destroy the torpedo. Once again he proposed
> > adding a small empty space at the front. It would crumple before the
> > rest of the head, buying a few extra thousandths of a second to give the
> > explosive time to detonate properly. (Navy engineers eventually solved
> > the problem by redesigning the contact detonator’s firing pin.)
> >
> > --
> >  On January 23, 1950, Einstein wrote in a letter.. I have never taken
> > part in work of a military-technical nature...
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-09-26 11:26 -0700
  Re: a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-09-26 11:46 -0700
    Re: a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-09-26 22:47 -0700
  Re: a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-09-26 11:51 -0700
    Re: a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind... Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-09-26 13:17 -0700
  Re: a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind... nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-09-27 12:53 +0200
    Re: a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind... Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2022-09-27 10:47 -0700
  Re: a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-09-29 00:20 -0700
    Re: a summary of Einstein's gift to mankind... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-09-29 12:06 -0700

csiph-web