Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #587257

Re: Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy.

Show key headers only | View raw

You left out flavors vanilla, chocolate  and strawberry. ...



What flavor is E in E=Mc2?


Richard Hertz wrote:
> 
> In science, energy is the capacity to do work with matter, and come in different flavors:
> 
> Energy variations: Gravitational, thermal (heat), mechanical, electrical, magnetic, electromagnetic, chemical, sound, atomic, nuclear, etc.
> 
> It's ALLEGED that, in a closed system, energy is conserved. So, while it can change from one form to another, the total energy is constant.
> 
> The measurement of the work exerted during time is done by the work done in a period of time.
> 
> Work, in the most elementary conception, is the ability to move matter in space. There are many examples of work, like in mechanics.
> 
> The 19th. Century was the century of the ENERGY, starting with definition of HEAT as energy, and ended with the definition of quanta of energy (Planck-1900, Lenard -1903). Both were awarded with Nobel Prizes (first Lenard, then Planck).
> 
> In the first decades of the 20th. Century, energy was more clearly defined in chemistry and, later, in nuclear physics.
> 
> The CRETIN contributed in NOTHING to the real physics, as he stole Poincaré-1900 FORMULAE for the conversion of the energy of
> a "cannon and its shots of light", which Poincaré conceived as transformed into KE (the recoil of such thought cannon).
> 
> Hasenhorl (1904-1905) demonstrated (as approximation for v << c) the conversion of INERTIAL MOTION into MASS for the EM radiation
> PRESSURE exerted on the ends of a closed black body cavity that moved inertially. The CRETIN stole this mathematically proven theory.
> 
> Happy?
> 
> You can add more types of energy, if you want. Like the one that existed on the FUCKING DOT before it exploded and created
> the Universe, as some atheists still propose.
> 
> You can also include the energy that FEEDS THE MATRIX.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 23:17 -0700
  Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 00:20 -0700
  Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-08 09:56 -0500
    Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 11:24 -0700
      Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-08 20:12 -0500
        Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 20:23 -0700
          Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 20:59 -0700
        Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 21:01 -0700
          Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 22:57 -0700
            Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 22:57 -0700
  Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-08 18:17 +0300
  Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 08:55 -0700
    Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 09:14 -0700
      Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:03 -0700
        Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:25 -0700
          Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:27 -0700
            Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:37 -0700
              Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:53 -0700
              Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-08 22:21 -0400
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 20:28 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-08 22:31 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-09 08:40 -0400
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 07:36 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 10:30 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 11:13 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 12:37 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 13:02 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-09 16:52 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps eating shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 17:08 -0700
  Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 17:17 -0700
    Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 17:59 -0700
      Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 18:47 -0700
        Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 22:25 -0700
      Re: Crank Dick Hertz gets to eat his idiocies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 19:17 -0700
        Re: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 20:25 -0700
          Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 21:20 -0700
            Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 22:10 -0700
              Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 06:21 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 09:27 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 09:40 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 09:47 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 09:51 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 10:05 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 10:40 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 11:26 -0700
  Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 18:06 -0700
    Cretin Richard Hertz tries (and fails) to move the goalposts once again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 20:17 -0700
      Re: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 21:17 -0700
        Rabid nazi bootlicker Richard Hertz frothes at the mouth. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 22:00 -0700
  Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 09:13 -0700
    Crank Richard Hertz perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 09:33 -0700
      Re: Crank Richard Hertz perseveres Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 10:15 -0700
        Re: Crank Richard Hertz perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 11:08 -0700
          Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 14:43 -0700
            Nazi bootlicker Richard Hertz at work. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-11 16:28 -0700
            Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-12 11:23 +0300
              Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 01:34 -0700
              Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 09:06 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-13 17:37 +0300
              Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-13 11:59 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-14 12:08 +0300
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-14 10:31 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-15 10:34 +0300
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 09:19 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-16 12:32 +0300
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-15 22:42 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 17:54 -0700
                Crank Richard Hertz goes off the deep end "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 19:25 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-16 21:09 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 15:04 -0700
                Crank Richard Hertz posts more of his imbecilities "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 15:55 -0700
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz posts more of his imbecilities Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 16:22 -0700
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz posts more of his imbecilities Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 18:03 -0700
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz posts more of his imbecilities "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 19:04 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-17 09:37 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 08:52 -0700
                Idiot Richard Hertz comes to terms with the fact he's an idiot "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 09:05 -0700
                Re: Idiot Richard Hertz comes to terms with the fact he's an idiot Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 10:18 -0700
                Re: Idiot Richard Hertz comes to terms with the fact he's an idiot "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 10:26 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-21 11:58 -0700
            Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-12 21:24 +0200
              Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 12:55 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-13 18:37 +0300
              Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 13:10 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-13 22:51 +0200
              Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 18:23 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 18:26 -0700
                Nurse! crank Richard Hertz needs his antipsychotic meds "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 18:56 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-13 22:50 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-13 14:07 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-14 10:18 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-14 10:05 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-14 20:44 +0200
                Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-18 13:10 -0700
                Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 11:34 -0700
                Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 15:39 -0700
                Re: Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-19 20:02 -0700
                Re: Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 22:41 -0700
                Crank Richard Hertz keeps spewing imbecilities "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 07:03 -0700
                Re: Crank Richard Hertz keeps spewing imbecilities Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-20 07:55 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-21 20:41 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-22 15:12 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-23 15:13 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 15:58 -0700
                Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 21:31 -0700
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-23 22:50 -0700
                Re: Odious kapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 06:41 -0700
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 06:49 -0700
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 09:09 -0700
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-24 22:52 +0200
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 14:56 -0700
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-25 20:13 +0200
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 11:41 -0700
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-26 21:55 +0200
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-26 13:15 +0000
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-24 23:18 +0000
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-25 19:31 +0200
                Re: Odioukapo Richard Hertz makes up porkies Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-25 19:52 +0000
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-24 22:52 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-24 14:59 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-25 20:38 +0200
                Re: Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-25 20:38 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principii fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-21 22:36 +0200
            Crank Dick Hertz comes to grips with the fact that he's a lying imbecile that no one listents to "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 13:40 -0700
              Re: Crank Dick Hertz comes to grips with the fact that he's a lying imbecile that no one listents to Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 13:53 -0700
                Re: Crank Dick Hertz comes to grips with the fact that he's a lying imbecile that no one listents to "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 15:09 -0700
  Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 00:00 -0700
    Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-15 10:56 +0300
    Crank Richard Hertz keeps up the entertainment "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 07:17 -0700
    Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-06-15 11:00 -0500
      Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-15 09:26 -0700
  Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 12:07 -0700
  Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 18:51 -0700
    Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-26 21:50 +0200
      Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-26 15:04 -0700
        Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-26 22:13 -0700
          Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 00:05 -0700
        Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-27 15:34 +0200
          Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 06:50 -0700
            Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-06-27 15:28 +0000
          Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 08:54 -0700
            Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-27 22:54 +0200
              Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-27 14:16 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-28 09:26 +0200
              Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-28 13:07 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 11:13 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-28 22:34 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 14:41 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-29 10:04 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 09:27 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-30 00:52 -0400
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 22:30 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-01 19:14 -0400
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 17:17 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-02 12:14 -0400
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-29 15:37 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 09:47 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-29 22:26 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 14:54 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-30 20:26 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-30 12:30 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 12:35 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-01 22:18 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-01 16:45 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-03 14:13 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-03 23:59 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-04 21:32 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-04 15:49 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-04 16:39 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-04 23:19 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-06 20:46 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 14:03 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-06 15:11 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-07 22:00 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-07 17:43 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-08 22:22 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-08 16:24 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-09 15:00 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-09 18:14 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-11 23:01 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-11 17:10 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-12 15:10 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-12 13:26 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-13 23:10 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-13 15:28 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-14 10:06 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-07-14 12:01 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-07-06 20:46 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-06-29 12:11 -0500
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 11:08 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2022-06-29 15:32 -0500
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 14:32 -0700
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-29 20:29 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-30 09:46 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-06-30 19:44 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-07-02 12:13 +0200
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-06-28 16:33 -0500
                Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c? approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-28 22:41 -0700
            Re: The 1905 paper about m=E/c² approximation is FALSE. Petitio principi fallacy. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-28 12:15 +0300

csiph-web