Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586604

Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree?

Show all headers | View raw

and I don't use timestamps by google or anyone else.

Now has no time stamp.

> If you post 'simultaneously', or as we little people say...
> 'at the same time'...


if i see you at the same time as me
it is my Now.


It doesn't make any difference if you're on the planet Pluto.

It's NOW everywhere.

But, here is the problem...

if I want to know where you're at...NOW, I have to pick a country.

I have what is known in the 'scientific community' to use the Scientific Method, 

I have to 'guess' the country.

And according to my 'guess', Agentina does not agree with Nature.


While Germany does.


(you certaintly not a chink)


I can eliminate Afganastan... 



The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> This has nothing to do with what time it is on My clock, or
> what time it is in Your clock.
> 
> This has to do with what time it is...Now.
> 
> If you post 'simultaneously', or as we little people say...
> 'at the same time'...
> 
> then we both have the same time which is NOW time.
> 
> We are both in the NOW, just a few miles apart.
> 
> So, so...if it is 11:pm on my clock
> and I post an article, ...and a second
> later you post an article...
> 
> then we are both in the same hour, the
> NOW hour.
> 
> 11:pm on my clock
> points to
> 3:00am in Argentina clock.
> 
> https://www.zeitverschiebung.net/en/difference/city/3435910/city/5368361
> 
> Buenos Aires
> (America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires)        Los Angeles (-4h)
> 3:00 am                                   11:00 pm
> 
> Tomorrow
> 11:00 pm
> it's
> 3:00 am
> 
> but, but..
> in Germany it is 8:00am.
> https://www.zeitverschiebung.net/en/difference/country/de/city/5368361
> 
> So, are you having coffee at 3:am in Argentina, or in Germany at 8:00am?
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Now, I notice that Richard Hertz
> > post around my time in Los Angeles
> > around 11:pm to 12:am.
> >
> > Then he comes in the next day
> > and post exactly around the same time
> > around my time in Los Angeles which is
> > around 11:pm to 12:am.
> >
> > So, he must
> > wake up
> > get a cup of coffee
> > view the news
> > and then hit
> > the newsgroup.
> >
> > The sun
> > is rising.
> >
> > The early bird
> > will get the worm.
> >
> > But, but...
> > if he is in Argentina..
> > it's 3:00 o'clock in
> > the FUCKING MORNING!!!
> >
> > NO WAY HE IS IN FUCKIN ARGENTINA!!!
> >
> > https://www.zeitverschiebung.net/en/difference/city/3435910/city/5368361
> >
> > SO, WHERE THE FUCK IS HE???
> >
> > So, since he sounds by his
> > outraged posts to be
> > in Germany...
> > https://www.zeitverschiebung.net/en/difference/country/de/city/5368361
> >
> > Now, I notice that Richard Hertz
> > post around my time in Los Angeles
> > around 11:pm to 12:am....
> >
> > which in Germany it is 8:00am
> >
> > So, he must
> > wake up
> > everyday at 8:00am
> > get a cup of coffee
> > view the news
> > and then hit
> > the newsgroup.
> >
> > That makes more sense, don't you agree?
> >
> > NO WAY HE IS IN FUCKIN ARGENTINA!!!
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

That makes more sense, don't you agree? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-07 15:28 -0700
  Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 15:45 -0700
    Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 16:05 -0700
      Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 16:17 -0700
        Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 19:43 -0700
          Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 20:14 -0700
        Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-06-07 19:51 -0700
  Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 15:46 -0700
  Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-07 21:07 -0700
    Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-08 10:19 -0700
      Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-08 10:40 -0700
      Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-08 10:47 -0700
  Re: That makes more sense, don't you agree? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-08 10:15 +0200

csiph-web