Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #655147
| From | hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Spacetime |
| Date | 2024-07-20 13:04 +0000 |
| Organization | novaBBS |
| Message-ID | <375e23f287c09b2ac6c1baebd065e462@www.novabbs.com> (permalink) |
| References | <46633b77bddb3b8bcf79567060ac4687@www.novabbs.com> <dee75c578692e86c17d13826fd3d3166@www.novabbs.com> <6-adnRDtLKXByAb7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 6:12:50 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote: > > On 07/18/2024 07:29 PM, gharnagel wrote: > > > > It seems that everyone is married to their own vision. > > That's fine, but it seems to me that they should start > > their own thread to discuss it. Then everyone can decide > > if they want to discuss it there. I want arguments > > against the ideas I've presented above. > > > > “I never learned from a man that agreed with me.” > > – Robert A. Heinlein > > > > OTOH, I never learned much from an idiot, either. > > > > All ideas fall short of reality, so Carl Sagan suggested > > a way to get closer: > > > > "Spin more than one hypothesis. If there’s something to > > be explained, think of all the different ways in which > > it could be explained. Then think of tests by which you > > might systematically disprove each of the alternatives. > > What survives, the hypothesis that resists disproof in > > this Darwinian selection among “multiple working > > hypotheses,” has a much better chance of being the right > > answer than if you had simply run with the first idea > > that caught your fancy. > > > > "Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just > > because it’s yours." > > If there's any good theory at all, > it's the one of them. It seems to be an evolution. Hypothesis A explains facts of Group A observations, but leads to Group B observations which require Hypothesis B, ... Are we getting closer to a TOE?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Spacetime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-19 02:29 +0000
Re: Spacetime Lamar Kovács <hvs@mrmmr.hu> - 2024-07-19 11:04 +0000
Re: Spacetime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-19 23:12 -0700
Re: Spacetime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-20 13:04 +0000
Re: Spacetime Tathan Hébert <ybaen@nhwnetb.fr> - 2024-07-20 14:01 +0000
Re: Spacetime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-20 09:36 -0700
Re: Spacetime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-20 18:57 +0000
Re: Spacetime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-20 21:20 +0200
Re: Spacetime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-20 14:09 -0700
Re: Spacetime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-20 23:21 +0200
Re: Spacetime hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-20 23:28 +0000
Re: Spacetime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-21 05:58 +0200
Re: Spacetime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-20 21:31 -0700
Re: Spacetime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-21 08:21 +0200
Re: Spacetime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-21 13:36 -0700
Re: Spacetime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-21 19:53 -0700
Re: Spacetime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-22 21:23 +0200
Re: Spacetime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 12:52 -0700
Re: Spacetime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-23 08:48 +0200
Re: Spacetime Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 13:03 -0700
csiph-web