Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #653688

Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate

Show all headers | View raw

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 13.05.2024 o 16:38, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > Maciej Wozniak prevaricated:
> > >
>>> W dniu 13.05.2024 o 03:40, gharnagel pisze:
>>> >
>>> > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > W dniu 12.05.2024 o 20:22, gharnagel pisze:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Poor eighth-brain is trying to obscure the whole situation once 
>>> > > > again.  He pretends there is only one "Holy measurement" but the
>>> > > > fact is that there are many who can be making the measurement,
>>> > > > each traveling at a different > speed, and each getting a different
>>> > > > value.
>>> > >
>>> > > And?
>>> > > The "And?" is obvious to anyone having more than one-eighth of a 
>>> brain: > WHICH ONE IS THE "HOLY MEASUREMENT"?
>>>
> > > In your religion, Harrie - any.
> > >    Duh!
> > 
> > Not good enough, weasel-breath.  YOU are the one with snot on your face.
> > YOU are the one dissenting from the confirmed standpoint.  YOU are the one
> > that brought up your "holy measurement" stupidity.  Now put up or shut up.

> How about - command some glowing worms, Harrie,
> poor halfbrain?

Poor eighth-brain.

> > > Once again, I'm talking to an idiot,
> > 
> > Then you're talking to yourself, weasel-breath.
> > 
> > > so no surprise I have to repeat some times.
> > > Can you, or can  poor idiot Tom - provide
> > > many examples of things that are not physical
> > > but are physically measured?
> > 
> > I did
>
> How many?

So poor eighth-brain can't count for himself?

Sorry, pipsqueak, you don't get to command a performance
from people of note.

"Poor eighth-brain is trying to obscure the whole situation once 
again.  He pretends there is only one "Holy measurement" but the
fact is that there are many who can be making the measurement,
each traveling at a different speed, and each getting a different
value."

Count 'em up, creep.  How many different speeds are there between
zero and c?  Then double it because there are just as many between
zero and -c.

> > > Anyone can check, GPS staff didn't repeat
> > > your mad assumptions and its clocks keep
> > > measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks
> > > always did.
> > 
> > 
> > Wozzie-stupe just repeats his stupidity instead
> > of answering the question.  He is not only stupid,
> > but fatally corrupt.  And he lies by omission
> > every time he posts his foolish GPS insanity.

> Your lies, insult and slanders change nothing,
> poor fanatic trash. Your utterly idiotic concept
> of time and clocks doesn't and won't work. You
> even admit it yourself sometimes

Says the liar, insulter and slanderer :-))

who is also stupider than a fence post.

> - even such a piece of fanatic shit can't lie 100%
> of time.

But Wozzie-fool proves that he can lie 100% of the time
with every post :-))

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-11 08:19 +0200
  Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-11 13:25 +0000
    Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-11 16:58 +0200
      Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-12 18:22 +0000
        Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-12 20:45 +0200
          Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-13 01:40 +0000
            Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-13 07:37 +0200
              Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-13 14:38 +0000
                Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-13 17:49 +0200
                Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-05-13 18:46 +0000
                Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-13 21:29 +0200
    Re: Experiments Refute Einstein's 1905 Second Postulate Patric Romão <pt@prrpoxr.pt> - 2024-05-11 21:18 +0000

csiph-web