Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #645354 > unrolled thread

Re: Stellar aberration - again

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Stellar aberration - again Chadd Babaitsev <sace@iddi.ru> - 2026-06-04 12:50 +0000
    Re: Stellar aberration - again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-06-06 09:05 +0200
      Re: Stellar aberration - again Troyonta Funakoshi <kttr@auso.jp> - 2026-06-06 11:08 +0000
        Re: Stellar aberration - again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-06-06 23:38 +0200
          Re: Stellar aberration - again Abner Ustinovich <ibuvov@sbucn.ru> - 2026-06-07 08:23 +0000
            Re: Stellar aberration - again Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-06-08 08:54 +0200
              Re: Stellar aberration - again Newton Grünewald <dznn@ldt.de> - 2026-06-08 09:58 +0000
              Re: Stellar aberration - again Dylan Wyrzyk <wnyl@yzwrr.pl> - 2026-06-08 10:13 +0000
                Re: Stellar aberration - again phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 07:42 -0600
                  Re: Stellar aberration - again Andreas Amoretto <tossto@trmatad.it> - 2026-06-08 15:00 +0000
                    Re: Stellar aberration - again phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 09:06 -0600
                      Re: Stellar aberration - again Raymundo Nishikawa <iunm@aiamr.jp> - 2026-06-09 13:12 +0000

#645354 — Re: Stellar aberration - again

Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> The logic of a brainwashed religious maniac:
> 
>   An SI-clock in GPS orbit must be adjusted down by the factor (1 -
>   4.4647e-10) to make it stay in sync with an SI-clock on the ground.

you adjust by offsets, not by factors. You regulate and control by 
factors, where you need a feedback and a setpoint, to do the factor.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#645363

The 'nym-shifting troll demonstrated their ignorance as "Chadd Babaitsev":
> Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>> The logic of a brainwashed religious maniac:
>>
>>   An SI-clock in GPS orbit must be adjusted down by the factor (1 -
>>   4.4647e-10) to make it stay in sync with an SI-clock on the ground.
> 
> you adjust by offsets, not by factors. You regulate and control by 
> factors, where you need a feedback and a setpoint, to do the factor.

*facepalm*

  1 - 4.4647e-10 = ?

See also: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2003-1>

F'up2 <news:sci.physics.relativity>

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645364

inbreed wanker braindead Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

>>>   An SI-clock in GPS orbit must be adjusted down by the factor (1 -
>>>   4.4647e-10) to make it stay in sync with an SI-clock on the ground.
>> 
>> you adjust by offsets, not by factors. You regulate and control by
>> factors, where you need a feedback and a setpoint, to do the factor.
> 
> *facepalm*
> 
>   1 - 4.4647e-10 = ?

this illiterate imbecile doesnt know what an offset is. Nor anything else. 
Some countries puts you in prison for being this stupid.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645365

The 'nym-shifting troll demonstrated their ignorance as "Troyonta Funakoshi":
> inbreed wanker braindead Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> [Paul B. Andersen wrote:]
>>>>   An SI-clock in GPS orbit must be adjusted down by the factor (1 -
>>>>   4.4647e-10) to make it stay in sync with an SI-clock on the ground.
>>>
>>> you adjust by offsets, not by factors. You regulate and control by
>>> factors, where you need a feedback and a setpoint, to do the factor.
>>
>> *facepalm*
>>
>>   1 - 4.4647e-10 = ?
> 
> [didn't answer the question, instead threw a temper tantrum]

The correct answer is 0.99999999955353

This number lies between 0 and 1 exclusive, thus multiplying by it is
equivalent to adjusting the original value by a small negative offset,
namely 4.4647e-10 of the original value (here: x):

  x (1 - ε) = x - ε x.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645367

half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

> The correct answer is 0.99999999955353
> 
> This number lies between 0 and 1 exclusive, thus multiplying by it is
> equivalent to adjusting the original value by a small negative offset,
> namely 4.4647e-10 of the original value (here: x):

this inbreed wanker observes he is an imbecile, now calling it by the 
correct term, offset. Get yourself a proper education, you deplorable 
fool. Your natzi country is historically a shithole. You dont even have 
food to eat, something that etches your fucking brain.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645370

The 'nym-shifting troll trolled as "Abner Ustinovich":
> half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

Is "half german" supposed to be an insult? :-D

>> The correct answer is 0.99999999955353
>>
>> This number lies between 0 and 1 exclusive, thus multiplying by it is
>> equivalent to adjusting the original value by a small negative offset,
>> namely 4.4647e-10 of the original value (here: x):
> 
> this inbreed wanker [...]

Apparently it is again time to let your (new) Usenet provider know about
your trolling.  As you simply cannot help yourself, yes?

F'up2 where it belongs

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645372

pear shaped fag half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

>> half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
> Is "half german" supposed to be an insult? :-D

it's well established historically that the russians gang raped your 
mothers, thus mathematically you mostly can be half gearmon and extremely 
stupid, as here by snipping the parts proving you an imbecile

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645373

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

>> half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
> Is "half german" supposed to be an insult? :-D

it's documented in the history books, the russians gang raped your 
shithole of a whore country. Now you are going to become mostly a quarter 
gearmon, as apparently you like being gang raped, you indolent stupid 
natzi mazarfaka.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645376

Dylan Wyrzyk wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
>>> half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>
>> Is "half german" supposed to be an insult? :-D
> 
> it's documented in the history books, the russians gang raped your
> shithole of a whore country. Now you are going to become mostly a quarter
> gearmon, as apparently you like being gang raped, you indolent stupid
> natzi mazarfaka.
> 
You're the stupid fuck promoting the false concept that gang-rape leads 
to stupidity. It's hard to say it but it has nothing to do with it. You 
are putting forward half-ideologies of your pathetic, perverse mind.

-- 
The future has begun
The waiting is over
We have gained time
For one blink of an eye

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645377

phoenix wrote:

>> it's documented in the history books, the russians gang raped your
>> shithole of a whore country. Now you are going to become mostly a
>> quarter gearmon, as apparently you like being gang raped, you indolent
>> stupid natzi mazarfaka.
>> 
> You're the stupid fuck promoting the false concept that gang-rape leads
> to stupidity. It's hard to say it but it has nothing to do with it.

why are you even open you stinking dirty mouth, once you admit it's hard 
to say, the correctness of the history books documenting the gang rape on 
the natzis, with palpable proofs  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645378

Andreas Amoretto wrote:
> phoenix wrote:
> 
>>> it's documented in the history books, the russians gang raped your
>>> shithole of a whore country. Now you are going to become mostly a
>>> quarter gearmon, as apparently you like being gang raped, you indolent
>>> stupid natzi mazarfaka.
>>>
>> You're the stupid fuck promoting the false concept that gang-rape leads
>> to stupidity. It's hard to say it but it has nothing to do with it.
> 
> why are you even open you stinking dirty mouth, once you admit it's hard
> to say, the correctness of the history books documenting the gang rape on
> the natzis, with palpable proofs
> 
Because you have shown yourself to know zero about hereditary 
attributes. You come in here with your stinking genetic ignorance, 
projecting vulnerability where there is none. Next you will be telling 
us about ass-babies and blonde Chinese people.

-- 
The future has begun
The waiting is over
We have gained time
For one blink of an eye

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645383

yet another pear shaped fag, former it-supporter, said phoenix wrote:

> Andreas Amoretto wrote:
>> phoenix wrote:
>> why are you even open you stinking dirty mouth, once you admit it's
>> hard to say, the correctness of the history books documenting the gang
>> rape on the natzis, with palpable proofs
>> 
> Because you have shown yourself to know zero about hereditary
> attributes.

where did he that, you fucking inbreed cretin, by naming the facts?? This 
wannabe scientist cant even read the fucking english

eat shit and fuck off, you already are too stupid to talk.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web