Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #638627 > unrolled thread

Re: Einstein versus Poincaré

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Einstein versus Poincaré Coby Schrijnemakers <ckess@sembo.nl> - 2025-06-07 10:28 +0000
    Re: Einstein versus Poincaré Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-09 07:17 +0200

#638627 — Re: Einstein versus Poincaré

Thomas Heger wrote:

> I had also doubts about the sources of 'On the electrodynamics of moving
> bodies' and especially about the alleged date.
> 
> I think, that Einstein's text contains actually quotes from "On the
> Dynamics of the Electron", which was published two weeks later.
> 
> Einstein had most likely also quoted Heinrich Hertz, but without
> reference and also incorrectly.

quoting?? the Einstine was so stupid not remembering his own quotes. Not remembering he had any quotes. He was just delivering patents to other people to undrestand. You take from the left and give it to the right.

US firebombed hundreds of Japanese towns constructed entirely of bamboo, killing hundreds of thousands-all civilians before dropping two atomic bombs unnecessarily. Nagasaki had no military installments to target.
But Nagasaki did have the highest concentration of Japanese Christians in all of Japan. And ’D-Day’ (Operation Overlord-1944) was launched on June 6th at exactly 6 am. Sixth month…sixth day…sixth hour…666

Exactly. D-Day is short for Devil’s Day. The Devil was the «Overlord» of the whole operation. That's the day the english jews killed Jesus for their master, the god of this world, read satan, telling them to cut off the head of their own children.

that's what good old Christian Russia is dealing with right now. The fake Christians satanists pigs of this world.

US is a global thug and sponsor of genocidal Zionist scum and all these wars around the world and the holocaust of Palestine is being sponsored by the deadbeat US warmongers. Iran has proven be a good reliable ally of Russia along with DPRK and Russia will stand by Iran. It is time Iran just test a nuclear weapon as that is the only language these Anglo-Zionist genocidal criminals understand.

https://r%74.com/news/618757-iranian-mp-russia-us-threats-nuclear-talks-trap/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#638639

Am Samstag000007, 07.06.2025 um 12:28 schrieb Coby Schrijnemakers:
> Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
>> I had also doubts about the sources of 'On the electrodynamics of moving
>> bodies' and especially about the alleged date.
>>
>> I think, that Einstein's text contains actually quotes from "On the
>> Dynamics of the Electron", which was published two weeks later.
>>
>> Einstein had most likely also quoted Heinrich Hertz, but without
>> reference and also incorrectly.
> 
> quoting?? the Einstine was so stupid not remembering his own quotes. Not remembering he had any quotes. He was just delivering patents to other people to undrestand. You take from the left and give it to the right.


I have actually obtained copies of the books of Heinrich Hertz and spent 
some time on searching for similarities to Einstein's text.

As German is my primary language, I had no difficulty in reading them.

Hertz was also a very good writer and so it was not hat difficult to 
read his papers.

I have searched his works (few, actually, as he died relatively young) 
and found a lot of things, which looked like Einstein's text.

As Einstein actually had mentioned the name 'Hertz', I was allowed to 
assume, that Einstein had read the books of Heinrich Hertz, too.

But Hertz was a convinced 'aetherist', while Einstein wasn't.

Hertz also used very similar equations, but with total derivatives, 
where Einstein used partial derivatives.

Hertz used also almost the same variable names, especially for the 
components of the electric and magnetic field strength vectors.

So: I found similarities, but also differences.

These differences are now, what is actually critical, because 'wrong 
quotes' are actually worse than 'no quotes'.

...


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web