Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #625337 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-02-18 13:16 -0500 |
| Last post | 2024-02-22 16:26 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 473 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-18 13:16 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-18 21:00 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-18 18:12 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-19 08:14 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-19 07:33 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-19 12:59 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-19 21:17 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-20 08:24 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-20 07:49 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-19 08:27 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-19 15:37 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-20 08:15 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-20 07:49 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-20 16:47 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-20 21:17 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-21 08:42 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-21 07:32 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-22 12:01 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-22 07:17 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-22 14:05 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-23 07:23 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-02-23 11:14 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-02-22 09:39 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-23 08:35 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-02-23 03:54 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-23 09:04 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-23 07:23 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-24 12:16 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-24 10:31 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-24 16:14 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-24 11:45 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-24 14:43 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-02-24 12:58 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-25 09:07 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-02-24 11:26 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-02-24 12:58 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-22 19:36 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-22 09:54 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-23 08:42 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-23 08:11 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-23 09:38 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-24 12:20 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-24 14:25 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-25 09:05 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-25 15:58 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-26 08:36 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-26 14:05 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-26 11:19 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-27 15:57 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-27 13:57 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-27 19:38 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-27 20:33 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-27 21:46 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-28 06:45 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-28 09:35 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-28 23:07 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-28 22:53 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-29 09:11 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-29 14:37 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-29 12:33 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-29 23:55 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-29 21:27 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-01 08:52 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-01 13:13 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-01 10:44 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-01 15:12 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-01 14:38 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-29 15:28 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-27 14:31 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-02-28 12:53 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-28 17:57 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-29 08:30 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-29 12:48 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-29 19:31 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-29 15:04 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-01 08:39 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-01 07:46 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-01 18:25 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-01 10:48 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-01 13:55 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-02 12:20 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-02 09:20 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-02 15:09 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-02 10:44 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-02 17:28 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-02 16:57 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-03 08:54 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-03 07:19 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-03 19:02 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-03 15:52 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 14:09 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-03 18:07 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 15:19 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-04 13:31 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 10:52 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-04 16:20 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 15:16 -0800
Why "not.first.false" Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-05 15:33 -0500
Re: Why "not.first.false" Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-05 19:42 -0800
Re: Why "not.first.false" Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-05 21:24 -0800
Re: Why "not.first.false" Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 11:22 -0800
Re: Why "not.first.false" WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-06 10:08 +0000
Re: Why "not.first.false" Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 09:23 -0800
Re: Why "not.first.false" Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-06 12:31 -0500
Re: Why "not.first.false" WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-06 18:20 +0000
Re: Why "not.first.false" Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-06 14:30 -0500
Re: Why "not.first.false" WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-07 10:44 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-05 14:07 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 15:56 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-04 09:44 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 13:26 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-04 17:53 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-05 10:09 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-05 06:36 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-06 10:00 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-03-06 05:34 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 09:21 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-06 17:24 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-06 09:44 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 09:55 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-06 18:06 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-06 11:51 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 14:52 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 14:53 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-07 10:53 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-07 08:24 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-07 12:07 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-08 07:55 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-08 14:01 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-09 10:19 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 14:51 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 16:15 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-09 15:54 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-09 15:56 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-09 16:21 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-09 16:40 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 14:47 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-06 08:24 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 09:17 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-06 17:28 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 09:39 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-06 09:52 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-06 18:13 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-06 12:06 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-07 11:01 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-07 12:12 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-08 08:29 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-08 14:06 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-09 10:22 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-03-09 11:42 +0100
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-09 11:16 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-03-09 15:09 +0100
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-09 09:33 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-09 11:54 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-03-09 23:04 +0100
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-09 17:36 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-10 12:23 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-09 13:27 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-09 13:44 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-10 10:21 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-04-01 20:16 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 10:34 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-10 05:55 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 14:31 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-10 11:39 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 21:45 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-10 15:01 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-11 08:36 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-11 10:27 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-03-11 14:15 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-11 21:26 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-11 21:21 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-11 19:06 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-12 09:00 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-12 09:43 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-12 12:18 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-12 12:35 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 11:36 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 12:59 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-13 17:46 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 15:44 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 16:42 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-13 10:24 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-13 08:09 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-13 19:32 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 13:06 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 13:25 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-13 22:35 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-14 17:09 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-14 10:39 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-14 18:38 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-14 12:06 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 14:46 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-15 13:02 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-15 09:01 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-15 09:41 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-15 21:48 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-15 15:19 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-16 08:39 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-16 13:22 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-17 10:59 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-17 13:11 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-17 21:27 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-17 14:54 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-18 11:17 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-18 08:41 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-18 20:16 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 13:45 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-19 09:43 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-03-19 09:30 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-19 10:43 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 16:02 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-18 20:31 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-19 11:05 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-03-19 09:35 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-19 08:42 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-19 17:00 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-19 10:14 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-19 18:24 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-20 10:16 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-21 19:34 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-21 22:41 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-22 12:19 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 16:01 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-17 15:04 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-17 15:40 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-03-18 07:15 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 17:13 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-17 18:53 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-17 21:24 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 11:09 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 11:18 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-14 17:42 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 19:22 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-15 12:10 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-15 13:31 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-15 11:25 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-15 12:11 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-15 12:16 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-15 13:34 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-15 14:36 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-15 16:22 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-17 19:43 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-17 20:08 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-15 21:52 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-15 18:38 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-16 08:51 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-16 09:17 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-17 01:55 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-17 11:14 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-17 13:26 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-17 21:36 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-18 12:04 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 08:37 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 09:11 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 10:15 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 13:26 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-18 17:30 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 18:00 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-18 15:35 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 13:14 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-18 20:44 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-18 18:54 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-19 10:51 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-19 18:00 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-19 18:00 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-19 18:00 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-19 18:00 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-19 18:00 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-19 16:54 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-21 19:42 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-03-21 21:11 +0100
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-22 12:06 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-03-22 13:12 +0100
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-22 12:16 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-03-22 18:05 +0100
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-03-22 08:17 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-22 12:55 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-03-22 12:08 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-03-22 18:08 +0100
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-21 19:04 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-21 17:09 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-21 18:47 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-21 19:10 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-22 08:01 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-22 12:13 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-22 14:13 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-22 18:54 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-22 19:26 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-22 19:41 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-22 21:20 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-23 15:13 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-24 11:45 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-24 19:45 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-25 14:36 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-26 18:16 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-27 13:25 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-27 14:23 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-27 15:17 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-28 06:43 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-28 21:08 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-22 13:17 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-22 18:49 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-22 17:48 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 16:08 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-18 16:22 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-12 10:49 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 12:39 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-12 15:55 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-13 10:32 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-13 14:33 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-13 19:37 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-12 09:42 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-12 10:04 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-13 10:22 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-09 20:07 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 10:50 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-09 13:24 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 10:29 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-10 06:00 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 14:40 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-10 11:46 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-03-10 23:02 +0100
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-10 11:48 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-06 14:56 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-07 10:47 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-07 12:03 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-08 07:54 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-08 13:34 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-09 10:09 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-09 15:39 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-03-10 00:46 +0100
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 10:38 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-03-10 14:03 +0100
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 14:36 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-03-10 14:00 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-10 13:04 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-10 14:18 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-11 11:45 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-11 15:51 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 21:32 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-10 14:48 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-11 08:45 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-11 09:21 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-11 10:31 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-11 21:23 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-12 10:18 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-12 10:50 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-12 11:39 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-13 10:27 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-13 08:10 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-13 19:33 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-13 12:37 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-13 17:13 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-14 17:07 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-14 10:40 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-14 18:41 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-14 12:01 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 14:42 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-15 12:57 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-14 14:41 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-11 15:52 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-11 14:15 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-11 21:25 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-11 18:36 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-12 08:57 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-12 14:28 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-13 10:31 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-13 14:53 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-13 19:40 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-13 18:23 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-14 17:03 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-14 17:25 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-15 12:19 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-15 16:26 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-15 13:48 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 11:23 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-15 21:54 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-15 18:35 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-16 08:37 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-16 16:10 -0400
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-10 13:20 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 21:34 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-10 14:49 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-10 16:33 -0700
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-10 10:36 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-08 13:37 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-03-05 08:49 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-06 13:29 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-07 10:41 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-07 14:24 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-08 07:52 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-08 09:14 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-08 15:32 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-08 12:43 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-08 19:02 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-08 09:37 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-08 14:26 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-08 12:29 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-08 12:41 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-08 13:56 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-08 14:15 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-07 15:33 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-08 08:33 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-08 11:52 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-08 18:52 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-08 14:45 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-08 21:25 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-08 13:39 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 14:08 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 14:11 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-01 16:27 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-02 14:33 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-02 18:04 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-03 08:51 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 11:48 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-04 08:08 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-04 18:56 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-04 12:49 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-04 16:39 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-05 09:57 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-03-05 06:40 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-03-05 08:15 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-06 10:04 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-03-04 16:52 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-03-05 10:07 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-03-05 08:50 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-20 10:36 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-19 15:21 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-20 08:12 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-20 07:49 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-20 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-20 21:17 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-21 08:47 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-21 07:32 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-20 15:02 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-20 21:59 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-02-20 14:19 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-20 18:55 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-21 08:39 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-21 07:32 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-21 14:26 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-22 13:06 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-22 13:12 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-23 08:55 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-23 14:21 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-24 12:10 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-24 12:55 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-25 09:01 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-25 14:35 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-26 08:32 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-26 11:44 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-27 14:24 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-02-27 09:42 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-02-27 12:45 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-02-22 16:25 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-02-22 16:44 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-20 21:17 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-21 08:52 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-21 07:32 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-22 12:04 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-22 07:17 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-22 14:11 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-02-22 16:27 -0800
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-23 07:23 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-24 11:30 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-24 10:31 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-02-24 16:16 +0000
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-02-24 11:29 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-02-24 11:47 -0500
Re: Question about unbounded infinite sets... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-02-22 16:26 -0800
Page 17 of 24 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 24 Next page →
| From | WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 10:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <O2nakX_QwzFLFvB5OOHFH-xirF8@jntp> |
| In reply to | #625975 |
Le 09/03/2024 à 22:24, Richard Damon a écrit :
> On 3/9/24 2:22 AM, WM wrote:
> your logic is the logic of FINITE sets,
This logic is basic to all thinking. If infinite sets violate it, then
they annot exist.
>> If there are unit fractions in linear order, then there is a first
>> instance where NUF(x) =/= 0. This is general logic that cannot be
>> violated without violating all of mathematics.
>
> Nope. That is logic of FINITE sets.
It is basic to all thinking.
>
> Your logic just doesn't get you to either the Natural Numbers or the
> Unit Fraction, just arbitrary finite subsets of them. Your "FISON"s
This logic shows ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo. It
does not exclude the existence of ℵo but it shows that ℵo numbers are
dark.
Regards, WM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 06:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <uskatl$1dtma$3@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #625990 |
On 3/10/24 3:29 AM, WM wrote:
> Le 09/03/2024 à 22:24, Richard Damon a écrit :
>> On 3/9/24 2:22 AM, WM wrote:
>
>> your logic is the logic of FINITE sets,
>
> This logic is basic to all thinking. If infinite sets violate it, then
> they annot exist.
No, it may be basic to YOUR thinking, but some people can think better
than that.
>
>>> If there are unit fractions in linear order, then there is a first
>>> instance where NUF(x) =/= 0. This is general logic that cannot be
>>> violated without violating all of mathematics.
>>
>> Nope. That is logic of FINITE sets.
>
> It is basic to all thinking.
Nope. Maybe YOU can't think past it, but that is YOUR thought.
>>
>> Your logic just doesn't get you to either the Natural Numbers or the
>> Unit Fraction, just arbitrary finite subsets of them. Your "FISON"s
>
> This logic shows ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo. It does not
> exclude the existence of ℵo but it shows that ℵo numbers are dark.
Nope, this "Darkness" is just the limitation of your thinking and not
allowing your self to get out of small thoughts.
>
> Regards, WM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 14:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <xhScvvav8R2Hle1VWWvZcCPJLcQ@jntp> |
| In reply to | #625997 |
Le 10/03/2024 à 14:00, Richard Damon a écrit : > On 3/10/24 3:29 AM, WM wrote: >>>> If there are unit fractions in linear order, then there is a first >>>> instance where NUF(x) =/= 0. This is general logic that cannot be >>>> violated without violating all of mathematics. >>> >>> Nope. That is logic of FINITE sets. >> >> It is basic to all thinking. > > Nope. Maybe YOU can't think past it, but that is YOUR thought. Everything else is belief in nonsense, meaningless to discuss about. EOD. Regards, WM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 11:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <uskv6e$1enef$7@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #626001 |
On 3/10/24 7:40 AM, WM wrote: > Le 10/03/2024 à 14:00, Richard Damon a écrit : >> On 3/10/24 3:29 AM, WM wrote: > >>>>> If there are unit fractions in linear order, then there is a first >>>>> instance where NUF(x) =/= 0. This is general logic that cannot be >>>>> violated without violating all of mathematics. >>>> >>>> Nope. That is logic of FINITE sets. >>> >>> It is basic to all thinking. >> >> Nope. Maybe YOU can't think past it, but that is YOUR thought. > > Everything else is belief in nonsense, meaningless to discuss about. > EOD. > > Regards, WM > > Maybe for you, but not to others. Brings to mind an old proverb from a frind: You can't think about that which you refuse to think about. If you limit yourself to finite logic, then you, by your own restrictions, can not think about things that are not finite. So, you have put yourself into the finite box, but want to reach out to the infinite, but have defined TO YOURSELF, that you can't get there. What is holding yourself back, is YOU.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 23:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uslam3$36dvr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #626007 |
Richard Damon schrieb: > On 3/10/24 7:40 AM, WM wrote: >> Le 10/03/2024 à 14:00, Richard Damon a écrit : >>> On 3/10/24 3:29 AM, WM wrote: >> >>>>>> If there are unit fractions in linear order, then there is a first >>>>>> instance where NUF(x) =/= 0. This is general logic that cannot be >>>>>> violated without violating all of mathematics. >>>>> >>>>> Nope. That is logic of FINITE sets. >>>> >>>> It is basic to all thinking. >>> >>> Nope. Maybe YOU can't think past it, but that is YOUR thought. >> >> Everything else is belief in nonsense, meaningless to discuss about. >> EOD. >> >> Regards, WM >> >> > > Maybe for you, but not to others. > > Brings to mind an old proverb from a frind: > > You can't think about that which you refuse to think about. > > > If you limit yourself to finite logic, then you, by your own > restrictions, can not think about things that are not finite. > > So, you have put yourself into the finite box, but want to reach out to > the infinite, but have defined TO YOURSELF, that you can't get there. > > What is holding yourself back, is YOU. Exactly!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 11:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <uskv9g$1enef$8@i2pn2.org> |
| In reply to | #625990 |
On 3/10/24 3:29 AM, WM wrote:
> Le 09/03/2024 à 22:24, Richard Damon a écrit :
>> On 3/9/24 2:22 AM, WM wrote:
>
>> your logic is the logic of FINITE sets,
>
> This logic is basic to all thinking. If infinite sets violate it, then
> they annot exist.
>
>>> If there are unit fractions in linear order, then there is a first
>>> instance where NUF(x) =/= 0. This is general logic that cannot be
>>> violated without violating all of mathematics.
>>
>> Nope. That is logic of FINITE sets.
>
> It is basic to all thinking.
>>
>> Your logic just doesn't get you to either the Natural Numbers or the
>> Unit Fraction, just arbitrary finite subsets of them. Your "FISON"s
>
> This logic shows ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo. It does not
> exclude the existence of ℵo but it shows that ℵo numbers are dark.
>
> Regards, WM
If you want to limit yourself to finite things, go ahead, but don't
claim that others can't reach past your reach.
Your "Darkness" is just you shutting your minds eye to that which is
beyond what you will let yourself see.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-06 14:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <usasah$lf51$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #625885 |
On 3/6/2024 9:28 AM, WM wrote: > Le 06/03/2024 à 17:24, Richard Damon a écrit : > >> I was saying that you NUF doesn't prove what you claim, because your >> NUF doesn't actually exist as a function with defined values at define >> points for values of x > 0. > > If infinity is actually complete, then NUF exists. huh? Since when does a infinite unbounded set like the natural numbers finally complete? That implies that you think that there is a largest natural number and/or a smallest unit fraction. Nonsense!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-07 10:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <SseMnKDjxWdeOLALud8RC0KQDeY@jntp> |
| In reply to | #625910 |
Le 06/03/2024 à 23:56, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : > On 3/6/2024 9:28 AM, WM wrote: >> Le 06/03/2024 à 17:24, Richard Damon a écrit : >> >>> I was saying that you NUF doesn't prove what you claim, because your >>> NUF doesn't actually exist as a function with defined values at define >>> points for values of x > 0. >> >> If infinity is actually complete, then NUF exists. > > huh? Since when does a infinite unbounded set like the natural numbers > finally complete? Since Cantor claims a sequence of digits d_n could define a real number uniquely. > That implies that you think that there is a largest > natural number and/or a smallest unit fraction. In fact. > Nonsense! In fact. Or dark. Regards, WM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-07 12:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <usd6jc$17l4t$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #625916 |
On 3/7/2024 2:47 AM, WM wrote: > Le 06/03/2024 à 23:56, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : >> On 3/6/2024 9:28 AM, WM wrote: >>> Le 06/03/2024 à 17:24, Richard Damon a écrit : >>> >>>> I was saying that you NUF doesn't prove what you claim, because your >>>> NUF doesn't actually exist as a function with defined values at >>>> define points for values of x > 0. >>> >>> If infinity is actually complete, then NUF exists. >> >> huh? Since when does a infinite unbounded set like the natural numbers >> finally complete? > > Since Cantor claims a sequence of digits d_n could define a real number > uniquely. > >> That implies that you think that there is a largest natural number >> and/or a smallest unit fraction. > > In fact. In fact there is no smallest unit fraction... In fact there is no largest natural number... Oh boy, fun times! ;^) > >> Nonsense! > > In fact. Or dark. > > Regards, WM > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-08 07:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <SZDDuzvh_e-4Nom2pc5yNi48cGg@jntp> |
| In reply to | #625925 |
Le 07/03/2024 à 21:03, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : > In fact there is no smallest unit fraction... > Each unit fraction is followed by a constant level of NUF. How to exclude this in your opinion? Regards, WM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-08 13:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <usg08s$1toc4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #625930 |
On 3/7/2024 11:54 PM, WM wrote: > Le 07/03/2024 à 21:03, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : > >> In fact there is no smallest unit fraction... >> > Each unit fraction is followed by a constant level of NUF. How to > exclude this in your opinion? On the way to zero, the lower limit wrt unit fractions: 1/2 - 0 = .5 // we got more unit fractions to go... 1/42 - 0 = 0.02380952 ... // we got more unit fractions to go... 1/69 - 0 = 0.01449275 ... // we got more unit fractions to go... [... on and on ...] Notice how they keep getting smaller, yet they will never equal zero? we go from 1 to zero, zero is its limit wrt: 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ect... so on and so fourth... See how there is no smallest one? Just like there is no largest natural number? Afaict, your logic is radically broken. Sorry about that. ;^o
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-09 10:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <k9Kko9G5cFdVtFksWVkC0S5uTwg@jntp> |
| In reply to | #625952 |
Le 08/03/2024 à 22:34, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : > On 3/7/2024 11:54 PM, WM wrote: >> Le 07/03/2024 à 21:03, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : >> >>> In fact there is no smallest unit fraction... >>> >> Each unit fraction is followed by a constant level of NUF. How to >> exclude this in your opinion? > > On the way to zero, the lower limit wrt unit fractions: > > 1/2 - 0 = .5 // we got more unit fractions to go... > > 1/42 - 0 = 0.02380952 ... // we got more unit fractions to go... > > 1/69 - 0 = 0.01449275 ... // we got more unit fractions to go... > > [... on and on ...] > > Notice how they keep getting smaller, yet they will never equal zero? Of course not. Therefore NUF(x) cannot increase at 0. > > we go from 1 to zero, zero is its limit wrt: > > 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ect... so on and so fourth... > > See how there is no smallest one? It cannot be seen. But if infinity is actual, then all unit fractions are present and each one has a gap behind it. > Afaict, your logic is radically broken. Logic, not mine but general, says, if there are unit fractions in linear order, then there is a first instance where NUF(x) =/= 0. Mathematics says ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n =/= 1/(n+1), proving a single first one. Regards, WM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-09 15:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <usirvm$2is0t$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #625964 |
On 3/9/2024 2:09 AM, WM wrote: > Le 08/03/2024 à 22:34, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : >> On 3/7/2024 11:54 PM, WM wrote: >>> Le 07/03/2024 à 21:03, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : >>> >>>> In fact there is no smallest unit fraction... >>>> >>> Each unit fraction is followed by a constant level of NUF. How to >>> exclude this in your opinion? >> >> On the way to zero, the lower limit wrt unit fractions: >> >> 1/2 - 0 = .5 // we got more unit fractions to go... >> >> 1/42 - 0 = 0.02380952 ... // we got more unit fractions to go... >> >> 1/69 - 0 = 0.01449275 ... // we got more unit fractions to go... >> >> [... on and on ...] >> >> Notice how they keep getting smaller, yet they will never equal zero? > > Of course not. Therefore NUF(x) cannot increase at 0. >> >> we go from 1 to zero, zero is its limit wrt: >> >> 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ect... so on and so fourth... >> >> See how there is no smallest one? > > It cannot be seen. But if infinity is actual, then all unit fractions > are present and each one has a gap behind it. Your gap wrt 1/2 to zero is filled with infinity. See the gaps here? Keep in mind that we are working with unit fractions. 1 - 1/2 - 0? 1->.5->0 1->.5->.25->0 See how 1/4 is "smaller" than 1/2? You are trying to go from zero up. Strange of you! > >> Afaict, your logic is radically broken. > > Logic, not mine but general, says, if there are unit fractions in linear > order, > then there is a first instance where NUF(x) =/= 0. > Mathematics says ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n =/= 1/(n+1), proving a single first one. > > Regards, WM > > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 00:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <usisct$2ivnm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #625979 |
Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 3/9/2024 2:09 AM, WM wrote: >> Le 08/03/2024 à 22:34, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : >>> On 3/7/2024 11:54 PM, WM wrote: >>>> Le 07/03/2024 à 21:03, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : >>>> >>>>> In fact there is no smallest unit fraction... >>>>> >>>> Each unit fraction is followed by a constant level of NUF. How to >>>> exclude this in your opinion? >>> >>> On the way to zero, the lower limit wrt unit fractions: >>> >>> 1/2 - 0 = .5 // we got more unit fractions to go... >>> >>> 1/42 - 0 = 0.02380952 ... // we got more unit fractions to go... >>> >>> 1/69 - 0 = 0.01449275 ... // we got more unit fractions to go... >>> >>> [... on and on ...] >>> >>> Notice how they keep getting smaller, yet they will never equal zero? >> >> Of course not. Therefore NUF(x) cannot increase at 0. >>> >>> we go from 1 to zero, zero is its limit wrt: >>> >>> 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ect... so on and so fourth... >>> >>> See how there is no smallest one? >> >> It cannot be seen. But if infinity is actual, then all unit fractions >> are present and each one has a gap behind it. > > Your gap wrt 1/2 to zero is filled with infinity. See the gaps here? > Keep in mind that we are working with unit fractions. > > 1 - 1/2 - 0? > > 1->.5->0 > > 1->.5->.25->0 > > See how 1/4 is "smaller" than 1/2? You are trying to go from zero up. Really, yes! > Strange of you! Indeed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 10:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3Kt7j5s-M5jj0KI_A-1_WEq5Dc0@jntp> |
| In reply to | #625980 |
Le 10/03/2024 à 00:46, Tom Bola a écrit : > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> You are trying to go from zero up. > > Really, yes! > >> Strange of you! > > Indeed. Why? If all unit fractions are existing, then it is possible. If not, then set theory is dead anyway. Regards, WM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 14:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <uskb3v$2vhfk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #625994 |
WM wrote: > Le 10/03/2024 à 00:46, Tom Bola a écrit : >> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> You are trying to go from zero up. >> >> Really, yes! >> >>> Strange of you! >> >> Indeed. > > Why? If all unit fractions are existing, then it is possible. No, because for every fraction 1/n there exist infinitely many fractions 1/m where m > n. > If not, then set theory is dead anyway. Only for you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 14:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <v0u3haFxoC0QcM3NcERxjutjf3I@jntp> |
| In reply to | #625998 |
Le 10/03/2024 à 14:03, Tom Bola a écrit : > WM wrote: > >> Le 10/03/2024 à 00:46, Tom Bola a écrit : >>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>> You are trying to go from zero up. >>> >> Why? If all unit fractions are existing, then it is possible. > > No, because for every fraction 1/n there exist infinitely many > fractions 1/m where m > n. If all are permanently existing, then there must be a first one according to logic. Regards, WM >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 14:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <usksfr$33c4v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #626000 |
WM explained on 3/10/2024 : > Le 10/03/2024 à 14:03, Tom Bola a écrit : >> WM wrote: >> >>> Le 10/03/2024 à 00:46, Tom Bola a écrit : >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>> You are trying to go from zero up. >>>> >>> Why? If all unit fractions are existing, then it is possible. >> >> No, because for every fraction 1/n there exist infinitely many fractions >> 1/m where m > n. > > If all are permanently existing, then there must be a first one according to > logic. According to your faulty logic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 13:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qbicnQOnCaT2j3P4nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #626005 |
On 03/10/2024 11:00 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: > WM explained on 3/10/2024 : >> Le 10/03/2024 à 14:03, Tom Bola a écrit : >>> WM wrote: >>> >>>> Le 10/03/2024 à 00:46, Tom Bola a écrit : >>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>> You are trying to go from zero up. >>>>> >>>> Why? If all unit fractions are existing, then it is possible. >>> >>> No, because for every fraction 1/n there exist infinitely many >>> fractions 1/m where m > n. >> >> If all are permanently existing, then there must be a first one >> according to logic. > > According to your faulty logic. "Faulty logic", is that where exceptions are rules, and vice-versa? There's something to be said for a logic of faults, if there's a faulty logic. For example a logic with non-conservative non-standard rulial and regular closures and completions, into each other, sort of is what results from "lines from points and points from lines". Of course, over time, and a good long time, it's clear that WM/MW is like a bot with broken coper and limited flexibility and terse obdurancy that every now and then gets a new howler from its sockpuppet groper, and the direction to point at it. Yet, that doesn't keep somebody who has a logic to deal with the illogical in the realm of the overall logical, all the matters of contingent, to keep it so that poor doomed adherents the quasi-modal can prove their own doom, that others need not, and then that of course when people get this back-and-forth in their ear, that there's a certain amount of ear fuzz, with which wisdom it filters the air, showing in the logic of illogic and the rules of exceptions, what is and isn't. There's something to be said for a logic that's a good monotone modal temporal logic, over a good, long, time. That there is one at all, ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-03-10 14:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ErydnQPbHb0tvnP4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #626009 |
On 03/10/2024 01:04 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 03/10/2024 11:00 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: >> WM explained on 3/10/2024 : >>> Le 10/03/2024 à 14:03, Tom Bola a écrit : >>>> WM wrote: >>>> >>>>> Le 10/03/2024 à 00:46, Tom Bola a écrit : >>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>> You are trying to go from zero up. >>>>>> >>>>> Why? If all unit fractions are existing, then it is possible. >>>> >>>> No, because for every fraction 1/n there exist infinitely many >>>> fractions 1/m where m > n. >>> >>> If all are permanently existing, then there must be a first one >>> according to logic. >> >> According to your faulty logic. > > > "Faulty logic", is that where exceptions are rules, > and vice-versa? > > There's something to be said for a logic of faults, > if there's a faulty logic. > > For example a logic with non-conservative non-standard > rulial and regular closures and completions, into each other, > sort of is what results from "lines from points and points from lines". > > Of course, over time, and a good long time, it's clear that > WM/MW is like a bot with broken coper and limited flexibility > and terse obdurancy that every now and then gets a new howler > from its sockpuppet groper, and the direction to point at it. > > Yet, that doesn't keep somebody who has a logic to > deal with the illogical in the realm of the overall > logical, all the matters of contingent, to keep it so > that poor doomed adherents the quasi-modal can prove their > own doom, that others need not, and then that of course > when people get this back-and-forth in their ear, that > there's a certain amount of ear fuzz, with which wisdom > it filters the air, showing in the logic of illogic > and the rules of exceptions, what is and isn't. > > There's something to be said for a logic > that's a good monotone modal temporal logic, > over a good, long, time. > > That there is one at all, .... > > How about this: a _dial_ knob, and a _twist_ knob. So, the Zeno's geometric series is the sum of the inverse whole powers of two, it's an infinite series, that in the infinite limit, has a finite sum, 1. It sort of has a big end, and a little end, that always starts at the big end, and finishes the little end. So anyways, a _dial_ knob has positions, while a _twist_ knob has location, here that each is between and including zero and one, or that it goes all the way around from 0+ to 1- when they're same, on the knob. If you ever enjoyed the multi-player digital or analog paddle controller the entertainment system called "Pong", you might know that original Pong is an _electrical_ system, while later Pong is an _electronic_ system. One can't exactly perceive the difference(s), they have. Yet, a mental model of the theories about them, makes it so that to each their own. So, _dial_ knobs are modular, while, _twist_ knobs are unital, in terms of the modular and unital, in terms of each other. Then, Zeno's series sort of is the _dial_ knob from the start, and the _twist_ knob, finished. This is where, reflexively, and symmetrically, a location is always nearest a position and a position is always nearest a location, favoring from the middle, the one in its direction, which is either 0->1 or 1->0. This sort of thing is sometimes called clock arithmetic, for the usual dial of the hands of the clock at any given instant, with regards to the continuous and uniform forward twist, of time, which in some implementations is the analog or smooth twist of the second hand, not so much moment-by-moment, as, moment-through-moment. And Zeno's like, "I got all day".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 24 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 24 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web