Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.math > #632245

Re: group theory question

From Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org>
Newsgroups sci.math
Subject Re: group theory question
Date 2024-10-09 19:21 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87r08pdz75.fsf@fatphil.org> (permalink)
References <vd7ior$u0fi$1@dont-email.me> <vd7k2o$u0fi$2@dont-email.me> <LYqdnWNq1-4T4Wr7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <vdciqe$1sq8f$2@dont-email.me> <prKcnWxvi4lBY2T7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>

Show all headers | View raw


Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> writes:
> Well if the conjecture fails, a counter-example suffices.  But like I
> said, I'm not sure what you're asking.  It should be apparent from
> tests that some (p,g) values work and some do not.

Mod(3,17) is a generator, but its 2^n-th powers hit Mod(1,17) really
quickly.

Phil
-- 
We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have
gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast
aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.
-- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/

Back to sci.math | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: group theory question Peter Fairbrother <peter@tsto.co.uk> - 2024-09-29 23:02 +0100
  Re: group theory question Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-09-30 02:29 +0100
    Re: group theory question Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2024-10-09 19:21 +0300
      Re: group theory question Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2024-10-10 05:06 +0100
        Re: group theory question Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2024-10-10 19:17 +0300

csiph-web