Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| Newsgroups | sci.logic |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-05 10:00 -0700 |
| References | <u846ge$inoj$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <9d342135-0d3f-4d4a-a08d-e61d3ef99dc0n@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed |
| From | Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> |
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 6:41:54 PM UTC+2, olcott wrote:
> The key innovation of this that that both H and H1 correctly determine
> all of the cases [ exccept where the "input has the conventional HP proof pathological relationship to H" ].
Do you have a PROOF for this claim?
I already mentioned a program which your alleged "halt decider" may not be able to handle correctly as well:
D(X) {
___n = 4;
___while (true) {
______if n is a counter example to the Goldbach conjecture, then return X;
______n = n+2;
___}
}
Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 11:41 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 10:00 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 10:07 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 16:14 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 12:41 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 10:45 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 12:55 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 17:18 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 17:21 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 19:36 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 17:46 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 21:07 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 20:25 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-06 21:37 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Khong Dong <khongdongphong@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 14:27 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 16:55 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-05 19:55 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 21:05 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-05 23:07 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-06 17:57 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-06 22:40 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-06 22:18 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-07 00:15 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 12:47 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-07 14:25 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 11:59 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-08 13:43 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 16:35 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-08 18:04 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 17:36 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-08 18:43 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 17:09 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-08 18:25 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 08:40 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-10 19:41 -0400
csiph-web