Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| Newsgroups | sci.logic |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-05 17:46 -0700 |
| References | (3 earlier) <0c82bf2e-2a4c-4a70-a766-0ee4fa2c00f0n@googlegroups.com> <u84apk$j2j5$2@dont-email.me> <262a238c-3a55-4963-877a-0e879f190626n@googlegroups.com> <d1d13297-95c8-4429-9259-fa4efe428c57n@googlegroups.com> <u852al$ll7d$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <49b9fe0b-d9f1-43a9-980b-295c557c237dn@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed |
| From | Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> |
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 2:36:40 AM UTC+2, olcott wrote: > On 7/5/2023 7:21 PM, Fritz Feldhase wrote: > > On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 2:18:40 AM UTC+2, Fritz Feldhase wrote: > >> On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 7:55:05 PM UTC+2, olcott wrote: > >> > >>> Within current knowledge [...] GC requires an infinite proof. > >> > >> Nonsense. You are delusional, man. > > > > Hint: Either D(D) halt's or doesn't halt. > > > > If your alleged "halt decider" is able to determine that correctly (in finitely many steps), then your alleged "halt decider" is able to solve the open problem (concerning the Goldbach conjecture). > > > I refute the <bla> Shut up, idiot. Hint: If, on the other had, your alleged "halt decider" is NOT able to determine that correctly (in finitely many steps), then your alleged "halt decider" has failed AGAIN / ONCE MORE.
Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 11:41 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 10:00 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 10:07 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 16:14 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 12:41 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 10:45 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 12:55 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 17:18 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 17:21 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 19:36 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 17:46 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 21:07 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 20:25 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-06 21:37 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Khong Dong <khongdongphong@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 14:27 -0700
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 16:55 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-05 19:55 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 21:05 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-05 23:07 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-06 17:57 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-06 22:40 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-06 22:18 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-07 00:15 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 12:47 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-07 14:25 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 11:59 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-08 13:43 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 16:35 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-08 18:04 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 17:36 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-08 18:43 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 17:09 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-08 18:25 -0400
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed olcott <polcott2@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 08:40 -0500
Re: The long standing objection to my work has been fully addressed Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-07-10 19:41 -0400
csiph-web