Re: ICC terminology?

From	Dale <dale@dalekelly.org>
Newsgroups	sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing, comp.graphics.apps.gimp, rec.photo.digital
Subject	Re: ICC terminology?
Followup-To	sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing, comp.graphics.apps.gimp, rec.photo.digital
Date	2015-12-03 22:27 -0500
Message-ID	<8vnmoh.v3b.17.1@news.alt.net> (permalink)
References	<8vl2q0.ojo.17.1@news.alt.net>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Followups directed to: sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing, comp.graphics.apps.gimp, rec.photo.digital

Show all headers | View raw

Dale wrote:

> if I am right, ICC profiles have the following rendering intents
> 
> 1) absolute colorimetry
> 2) relative colorimetry
> 3) hold saturation
> 4) perceptual
> 
> I would use the following replacements
> 
> 1) measurement match
> 2) appearance match
> 3) abstract match

could also have

3) abstract match 1
3) abstract match 2
3) abstract match 3
etc.



> 4) proof match
> 
> abstract profiles can define other moves besides hold-sat
> 
> proof can be different than PRMG related
> 
> relative colorimetric intent could include something like CIECAM02
> 
-- 
Dale
http://www.dalekelly.org

Back to sci.image.processing | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

ICC terminology? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-12-02 22:34 -0500
  Re: ICC terminology? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-12-03 22:27 -0500

csiph-web