Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.image.processing > #4066
| From | Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing, comp.graphics.apps.gimp, rec.photo.digital |
| Subject | ICC terminology? |
| Followup-To | sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing, comp.graphics.apps.gimp, rec.photo.digital |
| Date | 2015-12-02 22:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8vl2q0.ojo.17.1@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Followups directed to: sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing, comp.graphics.apps.gimp, rec.photo.digital
if I am right, ICC profiles have the following rendering intents 1) absolute colorimetry 2) relative colorimetry 3) hold saturation 4) perceptual I would use the following replacements 1) measurement match 2) appearance match 3) abstract match 4) proof match abstract profiles can define other moves besides hold-sat proof can be different than PRMG related relative colorimetric intent could include something like CIECAM02 -- Dale http://www.dalekelly.org
Back to sci.image.processing | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
ICC terminology? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-12-02 22:34 -0500 Re: ICC terminology? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-12-03 22:27 -0500
csiph-web