Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #696575 > unrolled thread

Re: v for frequency?

Started by"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com>
First post2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
Last post2023-07-25 10:08 +0200
Articles 20 on this page of 673 — 31 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 11:52 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:02 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:07 +0100
            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:08 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 04:18 -0700
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:34 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:10 -0700
            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:39 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:38 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-27 19:10 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:28 +1000
                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:30 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:20 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-05-27 21:23 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 20:28 +0000
              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:10 +1000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:31 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:50 +0000
              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:42 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:42 -0700
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 03:59 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:32 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 11:55 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:00 -0700
                      Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:36 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:20 +0000
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:40 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:04 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-25 13:40 +0100
                            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 17:41 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:29 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:58 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:57 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-08-11 20:56 +0100
                                Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-08-11 22:51 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:42 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:32 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-28 17:17 -0400
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:33 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:51 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:41 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:02 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:25 -0700
                          Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 19:14 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-27 08:33 -0700
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:32 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:34 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 06:58 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:43 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:03 -0700
                      Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-28 21:20 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:09 +1000
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:15 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:34 +1000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:27 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:11 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:48 +0200
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:47 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:01 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 21:45 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling and Trolling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:18 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:58 +1000
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 03:59 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 +1000
                                        Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:37 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:34 +1000
                                            Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:05 +0200
                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:42 +0100
                                          Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:04 +0200
                                      Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:57 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:39 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:42 +1000
                                            Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:08 +0200
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:07 +0200
                                    Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:00 +0200
                            Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:45 +0200
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:44 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:04 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:11 +1000
                              Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 04:11 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:19 +0200
                        Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:42 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:19 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:31 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:46 +1000
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:25 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:44 +1000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:16 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:06 +1000
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 +1000
                                Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:57 +0200
                              Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:56 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:39 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 22:05 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:20 +0200
                            Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:52 +0200
                          Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:51 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:16 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 07:11 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:20 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:17 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:55 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:04 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:12 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:23 +1000
                                      Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:11 +0200
                                    Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:10 +0200
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:03 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:15 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 07:39 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:20 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:13 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:16 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:58 +0200
                        Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads having at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:49 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 15:59 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:38 -0700
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:39 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:59 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:41 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:36 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:45 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:54 +0100
                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:09 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:13 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 15:30 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:33 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:40 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:46 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:07 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:07 -0700
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:27 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:05 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:36 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:39 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:06 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:37 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:09 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:42 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 08:02 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:01 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-31 02:00 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:39 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:08 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:48 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:08 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:41 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:11 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:53 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-01 21:11 -0700
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:16 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-29 14:57 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 16:38 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:10 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:50 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:11 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:43 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:52 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:19 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:50 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:13 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:22 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:56 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:37 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 17:34 -0400
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:30 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:10 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:54 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 03:27 +1000
                                    Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 03:27 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:08 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:25 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:11 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:38 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:13 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:26 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:44 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:03 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:37 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:04 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:27 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:33 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:21 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 10:15 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:16 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 12:48 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:10 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:24 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:21 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:46 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:23 +0100
                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:39 -0700
                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:43 +0100
                                                Re: The NATURAL IDIOT Alert, again! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:13 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:33 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:02 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:01 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:15 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Pamela <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 11:28 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 03:51 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-03 05:47 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 14:14 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:19 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-04 00:02 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:24 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-04 05:30 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:18 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 15:03 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 15:10 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:56 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> - 2023-06-03 16:54 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 17:57 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:20 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:15 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:22 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:44 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:49 +1000
                                      Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 01:49 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:01 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:37 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:02 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:30 +0000
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:14 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:10 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:03 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:18 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 03:05 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:27 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:23 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:49 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 11:30 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:19 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:18 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:34 +1000
                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 16:00 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-27 12:35 -0400
              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 18:39 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:42 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:01 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:11 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:33 +0000
              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:04 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:03 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:32 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:48 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 20:07 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:38 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 04:50 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-22 23:59 -0400
                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:21 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? jon <jon@nospam.cn> - 2023-07-23 14:41 +0000
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 17:22 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:56 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:33 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 23:25 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-24 05:52 +0100
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 09:55 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 11:03 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:12 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:30 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:06 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-25 08:40 +0100
                                Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:04 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:11 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 21:34 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 17:35 -0400
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:45 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 09:47 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 19:08 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 23:25 -0400
                                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:24 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:52 +0000
                                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:14 +0200
                                              Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:13 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:50 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:13 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:25 +0000
                                              Re: v for frequency? Jim Joyce <none@none.invalid> - 2023-07-26 12:43 -0500
                                                Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-07-26 20:15 +0200
                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-26 12:14 -0700
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:26 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2023-07-31 11:55 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:08 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-26 14:16 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 19:55 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:05 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:52 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:00 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:23 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 11:03 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:44 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 16:57 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:12 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 18:51 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-27 04:58 +0000
                                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-27 10:47 +0200
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:10 +0200
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:02 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 08:35 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 14:50 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 15:17 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 16:26 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:26 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:07 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:43 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:13 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:15 +0100
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:20 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:14 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:13 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:23 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:29 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-23 08:19 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 08:52 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:27 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:28 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:58 +1000
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:15 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:35 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:56 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:28 -0700
              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:10 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-27 04:40 -0700
      Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 13:33 +0000
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:09 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:22 -0700
            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:29 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:14 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:48 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:12 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:26 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 16:30 -0700
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:52 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:49 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:31 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:33 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:50 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:18 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:23 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:36 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:07 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:23 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:26 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 06:45 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:56 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:58 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:45 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:33 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:24 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:56 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:22 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:28 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 09:00 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? Bev <none@forme.com> - 2023-05-29 16:42 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:47 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:28 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:03 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:22 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:21 +1000
                                        Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 19:58 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:22 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 21:38 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:46 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 18:24 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:10 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 19:13 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 19:31 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:52 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:30 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-06-15 01:32 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-15 16:30 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:00 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:25 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:16 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:40 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:02 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 23:00 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 +1000
                                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:46 +0100
                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 10:27 +1000
                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:55 -0700
                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:36 +1000
                                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 22:14 -0700
                                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +1000
                                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 00:37 -0700
                                                      Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 02:23 -0700
                                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 19:55 +1000
                                                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 12:01 +0200
                                                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 13:14 +0000
                                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 14:32 +0100
                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:25 -0700
                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:36 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:41 +0000
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:20 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:24 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 13:03 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:17 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:16 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:26 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:35 +0000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:44 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:24 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:43 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:42 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 18:13 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:19 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 18:04 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:30 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:58 +0100
                                                            Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 15:53 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 16:05 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:12 +0100
                                                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:33 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:14 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:22 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:44 +0200
                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:51 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:38 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:45 +0200
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 +1000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 15:47 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:19 +1000
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 18:10 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:11 +1000
                                                                              Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:24 +0200
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:32 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 01:46 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 14:16 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:27 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 20:08 +0100
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 14:14 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 06:58 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:14 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:31 -0700
                                                                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:23 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 20:41 +0100
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-06-01 20:19 -0400
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 18:01 -0700
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:20 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-02 13:09 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-06-01 14:16 +0000
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 08:43 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:16 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:13 +0100
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 17:42 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 11:10 -0700
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:35 -0700
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 14:22 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 -0700
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 15:13 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 16:04 -0700
                                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:36 +1000
                                                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:44 +0200
                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:42 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:56 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:25 +0200
                                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:45 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 20:00 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:29 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:40 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:08 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:21 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-02 07:23 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 22:51 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-30 08:07 -0700
                                        Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 18:17 +0200
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:58 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:32 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:39 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:32 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 15:17 -0400
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:34 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 11:13 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:26 +1000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:05 +0000
                        Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:01 +0200
                      Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:58 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:00 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:04 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:50 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:01 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:59 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:05 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:20 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:27 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:44 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:47 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 22:20 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:10 -0700
                                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:14 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:14 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-28 14:19 -0400
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 21:20 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 13:33 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:46 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:03 -0700
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:18 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:41 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:03 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 05:41 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:25 +0000
                                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:08 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:44 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-07-29 19:45 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:56 -0700
                                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-30 00:35 +0000
                                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 10:15 +0200
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:12 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 00:43 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 17:24 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 14:14 -0400
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:27 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:48 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:05 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 17:27 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:38 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 18:53 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 21:02 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:42 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:28 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:39 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:29 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:30 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:32 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:10 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:46 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:10 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:14 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:33 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:15 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:52 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 21:59 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:46 +1000
                          Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:46 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:58 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:19 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:54 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-31 23:25 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 08:00 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:44 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 08:08 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 20:00 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 16:58 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:35 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 19:15 -0400
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 03:28 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 14:35 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:26 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 15:00 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:13 +0200
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:10 +0100
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:31 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 09:05 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 16:19 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 10:14 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 17:49 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-06-01 03:17 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:51 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:11 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 01:52 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:23 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:05 -0700
                            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:11 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-28 15:50 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:19 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:40 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 06:05 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:59 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:03 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:28 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 20:15 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:59 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:05 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:38 +0100
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:58 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:55 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 06:57 -0700
              Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:08 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:12 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:38 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-28 21:05 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:50 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:15 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:43 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:35 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:07 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:12 -0700
                  Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-28 23:53 -0700
        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:17 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:57 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:32 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:39 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:02 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 06:19 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:52 +0100
            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:37 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:02 +1000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:34 -0700
            Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:46 +0200
        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:51 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:31 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:53 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:45 +0000
            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:48 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0100
      Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:07 +0200
      Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 12:27 -0400
        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 10:05 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:59 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:58 +0000
          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:50 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 11:24 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-28 11:00 +0000
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 12:28 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 12:59 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:34 +0200
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-29 21:44 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:09 +1000
        Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0200
      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:15 +0100
          Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:09 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:30 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-24 15:49 +0100
              Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 17:39 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:10 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:31 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:07 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-25 07:02 -0700
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:08 +0200

Page 8 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 34  Next page →


#696946 — Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<su7dM.2995612$l5R6.2082348@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696909
On Tue, 30 May 2023 05:05:39 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

-- 
"Anonymous" to trolling senile Rodent Speed:
"You can fuck off as you know less than pig shit you sad 
little ignorant cunt."
MID: <62dcaae57b421e2b3b10e97d9c0ddf08@haph.org>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696937

FromMax Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com>
Date2023-05-29 20:36 +0100
Message-ID<u52usl$1jej3$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#696872
On 29/05/2023 16:27, John Larkin wrote:

> The US is interesting. There is no racial majority in my part of the
> country. Everybody is drinking with and sleeping with and having kids
> with everyone else. Diffusion has mostly defeated tribalism and
> racism. Eventually all of earth will be genetically homogenized.

I'm not sure the Blue Mink theory will stand Mendelian genetics, or it 
will require even more miscegenation.

-- 
Max Demian

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696939

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-29 19:39 +0000
Message-ID<kdkdapFa8tU15@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#696872
On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:27:21 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

> The US is interesting. There is no racial majority in my part of the
> country. Everybody is drinking with and sleeping with and having kids
> with everyone else. Diffusion has mostly defeated tribalism and racism.
> Eventually all of earth will be genetically homogenized.

Please keep it in your part of the country.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696953 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 22:06 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<DB7dM.5049763$US27.2242145@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696939
On 29 May 2023 19:39:06 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Please keep it in your part of the country.

Please keep your endless senile shit out of these newsgroups, you sick
senile bigmouth and braggart!

-- 
More typical idiotic senile gossip by lowbrowwoman:
"It's been years since I've been in a fast food burger joint but I used 
to like Wendy's because they had a salad bar and baked potatoes."
MID: <ivdi4gF8btlU1@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696938

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-29 19:37 +0000
Message-ID<kdkd7qFa8tU14@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#696860
On Mon, 29 May 2023 15:13:05 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> The world hates Britain because, by and large, they were better off when
> we were in charge.

India might disagree. The US certainly would. Argentina really wished 
you'd go home and Eire sent you home.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696955 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 22:09 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<yE7dM.6593726$miq3.2782372@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696938
On 29 May 2023 19:37:30 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> India might disagree. The US certainly would. Argentina really wished 
> you'd go home and Eire sent you home.

Everyone who has to listen to your endless senile shit wishes YOU'd go home.
But, in that case, you poor cat would have to listen to your endless drivel!
So, do everyone, including your cat, the favour and CROAK finally, you
useless bigmouth!

-- 
Yet more of the abnormal senile gossiping by the resident senile gossip:
"I never understood how they made a living but the space where the local 
party store was is now up for lease. It probably was more than helium. I 
often walk over the the adjacent market to get something for dinner and 
people stuffing balloons in their cars was a common sight. No more. I've 
no idea if there is another store in town."
MID: <kafs2nF6vi1U15@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697042

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 10:42 +0100
Message-ID<u54ged$1ugbs$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#696938
On 29/05/2023 20:37, rbowman wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 15:13:05 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> The world hates Britain because, by and large, they were better off when
>> we were in charge.
> 
> India might disagree.
Of course. Its highly embarrassing for them to admit that, but it is in 
fact true.
Juts look at what happened when Hindus and Muslims started mixing it it 
to create the Pakistans.


  The US certainly would.

The US still has England in charge.


>Argentina really wished
> you'd go home

Argentina was never a British colony, In fcat Britain helped it gain 
independence from Spain.
"Argentina rose as the successor state of the Viceroyalty of the Río de 
la Plata,[15] a Spanish overseas viceroyalty founded in 1776. The 
declaration and fight for independence (1810–1818) was followed by an 
extended civil war that lasted until 1861, culminating in the country's 
reorganization as a federation"

**wiki

  >and Eire sent you home.
Eire wasn't worth fighting for. It had no strategic or economic value

I do like your technique of, unlike the usual 'appeal to authority', of 
the 'appeal to bleeding ignorance'

-- 
“Ideas are inherently conservative. They yield not to the attack of 
other ideas but to the massive onslaught of circumstance"

    -  John K Galbraith

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697078

FromAnthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Date2023-05-30 08:02 -0700
Message-ID<2697174b-bae7-4881-8ca7-01b8051a9cc4n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#697042
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 7:42:44 PM UTC+10, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 29/05/2023 20:37, rbowman wrote: 
> > On Mon, 29 May 2023 15:13:05 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: 
> > 
> >> The world hates Britain because, by and large, they were better off when we were in charge. 
> > 
> > India might disagree.
>
> Of course. Its highly embarrassing for them to admit that, but it is in  fact true. 

It's not remotely true. India kept on having lethal famines until the British left. They had few famines after that, but somehow managed to ship enough food around to stop people dying.

> Juts look at what happened when Hindus and Muslims started mixing it it  to create the Pakistans. 

Just look what happened when Mountbatten wanted to get partition over an done with quickly. so that he could get home, and didn't leave enough time for the people on the wrong sides of the border to get to the side that was safe for them
 
> The US certainly would. 
> 
> The US still has England in charge.

The US is in a mess, but it has been their own mess since 1783. 

> >Argentina really wished  you'd go home.

> Argentina was never a British colony, In fact Britain helped it gain  independence from Spain. 
>
> "Argentina rose as the successor state of the Viceroyalty of the Río de 
> la Plata,[15] a Spanish overseas viceroyalty founded in 1776. The 
> declaration and fight for independence (1810–1818) was followed by an 
> extended civil war that lasted until 1861, culminating in the country's 
> reorganization as a federation".

And a whole lot of UK investment. The UK bought a whole lot of Argentine beef and grain for the next century, and treated it pretty much as a UK colony.

> >and Eire sent you home.
>
> Eire wasn't worth fighting for. It had no strategic or economic value.

Not Cromwell's opinion.

> I do like your technique of, unlike the usual 'appeal to authority', of  the 'appeal to bleeding ignorance'.

The Natural Philosopher recognises and admires his own approach when it is used by others. He shouldn't.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697145

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-30 23:01 +0000
Message-ID<kdndigFf9r7U8@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#697042
On Tue, 30 May 2023 10:42:37 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


>   The US certainly would.
> 
> The US still has England in charge.

Do you mean that as 'The governess is in charge of the snot nosed brat'?
> 
> 
>>Argentina really wished
>> you'd go home
> 
> Argentina was never a British colony, In fcat Britain helped it gain
> independence from Spain.

You certainly seem to think the Falklands should be yours. I suppose as 
the empire vanished you had to hold on to something for old times sake.

>   >and Eire sent you home.
> Eire wasn't worth fighting for. It had no strategic or economic value

Then why didn't you let it go in 1798? Or 1641 for that matter? 
 
> I do like your technique of, unlike the usual 'appeal to authority', of
> the 'appeal to bleeding ignorance'

When you're dealing with the ignorant...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697158

FromFredxx <fredxx@spam.uk>
Date2023-05-31 02:00 +0100
Message-ID<u56680$25ba5$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#697145
On 31/05/2023 00:01, rbowman wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 10:42:37 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
> 
>>    The US certainly would.
>>
>> The US still has England in charge.
> 
> Do you mean that as 'The governess is in charge of the snot nosed brat'?
>>
>>
>>> Argentina really wished
>>> you'd go home
>>
>> Argentina was never a British colony, In fcat Britain helped it gain
>> independence from Spain.
> 
> You certainly seem to think the Falklands should be yours. I suppose as
> the empire vanished you had to hold on to something for old times sake.

The Falklanders thought so.

>>    >and Eire sent you home.
>> Eire wasn't worth fighting for. It had no strategic or economic value
> 
> Then why didn't you let it go in 1798? Or 1641 for that matter?

Presumably the landowners failed to make money from the land somewhat 
later. Phytophthora infestans has a lot to answer for!

>> I do like your technique of, unlike the usual 'appeal to authority', of
>> the 'appeal to bleeding ignorance'
> 
> When you're dealing with the ignorant...
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697167

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 08:39 +0100
Message-ID<u56tjf$2atk4$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#697145
On 31/05/2023 00:01, rbowman wrote:
> You certainly seem to think the Falklands should be yours. I suppose as
> the empire vanished you had to hold on to something for old times sake.
The Falklands have never belonged to anyone else, but Britain, the 
Falkland islanders absolutely want to stay British, but Argentina, once 
one of the wealthiest countries in the world after ceasing to be part of 
Spain, has economic problems and its a convenient distraction for the 
government there to claim it 'ought' to be theirs, despite *never ever 
having been so*.

Largely because there may well be oil and gas reserves under it.

Why don't you shut your fucking loudmouth and go an invade Cuba, where 
probably the majority of the citizens would welcome being American, 
having lost their love of Marxist austerity and Che Guevara?

-- 
"Corbyn talks about equality, justice, opportunity, health care, peace, 
community, compassion, investment, security, housing...."
"What kind of person is not interested in those things?"

"Jeremy Corbyn?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697209

FromJohn Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com>
Date2023-05-31 07:08 -0700
Message-ID<cvke7il9c9i5sdacdj1518gkbuogcj73t0@4ax.com>
In reply to#697167
On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:39:27 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>On 31/05/2023 00:01, rbowman wrote:
>> You certainly seem to think the Falklands should be yours. I suppose as
>> the empire vanished you had to hold on to something for old times sake.
>The Falklands have never belonged to anyone else, but Britain, the 
>Falkland islanders absolutely want to stay British, but Argentina, once 
>one of the wealthiest countries in the world after ceasing to be part of 
>Spain, has economic problems and its a convenient distraction for the 
>government there to claim it 'ought' to be theirs, despite *never ever 
>having been so*.
>
>Largely because there may well be oil and gas reserves under it.
>
>Why don't you shut your fucking loudmouth and go an invade Cuba, where 
>probably the majority of the citizens would welcome being American, 
>having lost their love of Marxist austerity and Che Guevara?

If an oppressive government is starving its people and
arresting/torturing/killing dissidents, do the developed countries of
the world have a moral obligation to intervene?

North Korea. Cuba. Haiti. Zimbabwe. Many others.

I think so.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697217

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-31 14:48 +0000
Message-ID<kdp51nFnfv6U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#697209
On Wed, 31 May 2023 07:08:10 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

> If an oppressive government is starving its people and
> arresting/torturing/killing dissidents, do the developed countries of
> the world have a moral obligation to intervene?
> 
> North Korea. Cuba. Haiti. Zimbabwe. Many others.
> 
> I think so.

Kosovo?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697240 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 19:08 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<vaLdM.6559486$vSy3.2938529@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#697217
On 31 May 2023 14:48:24 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Kosovo?

Yes? More off topic shit? Right?

-- 
Trump-, Hitler- and Putin-sympathizer lowbrowwoman about Nazi-Germany's good
intentions:
"At the onset all Germany wanted was to build a road to East Prussia which
had been severed from Germany proper by the Danzig Corridor."
MID: <kabnetFft5qU17@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697237

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 17:41 +0100
Message-ID<u57tbe$2etgo$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#697209
On 31/05/2023 15:08, John Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:39:27 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> On 31/05/2023 00:01, rbowman wrote:
>>> You certainly seem to think the Falklands should be yours. I suppose as
>>> the empire vanished you had to hold on to something for old times sake.
>> The Falklands have never belonged to anyone else, but Britain, the
>> Falkland islanders absolutely want to stay British, but Argentina, once
>> one of the wealthiest countries in the world after ceasing to be part of
>> Spain, has economic problems and its a convenient distraction for the
>> government there to claim it 'ought' to be theirs, despite *never ever
>> having been so*.
>>
>> Largely because there may well be oil and gas reserves under it.
>>
>> Why don't you shut your fucking loudmouth and go an invade Cuba, where
>> probably the majority of the citizens would welcome being American,
>> having lost their love of Marxist austerity and Che Guevara?
> 
> If an oppressive government is starving its people and
> arresting/torturing/killing dissidents, do the developed countries of
> the world have a moral obligation to intervene?
> 
> North Korea. Cuba. Haiti. Zimbabwe. Many others.
> 
> I think so.
> 
Morality has very little place in realpolitik.
The issue is whether interfering in someone else's government bring 
rewards or just cost money and lives, Cf Afghanistan.


-- 
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will 
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such 
time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic 
and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally 
important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for 
the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the 
truth is the greatest enemy of the State.

Joseph Goebbels



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697255

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-06-01 06:11 +1000
Message-ID<op.15trp3vbbyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#697209
On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:08:10 +1000, John Larkin  
<jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:39:27 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 31/05/2023 00:01, rbowman wrote:
>>> You certainly seem to think the Falklands should be yours. I suppose as
>>> the empire vanished you had to hold on to something for old times sake.
>> The Falklands have never belonged to anyone else, but Britain, the
>> Falkland islanders absolutely want to stay British, but Argentina, once
>> one of the wealthiest countries in the world after ceasing to be part of
>> Spain, has economic problems and its a convenient distraction for the
>> government there to claim it 'ought' to be theirs, despite *never ever
>> having been so*.
>>
>> Largely because there may well be oil and gas reserves under it.
>>
>> Why don't you shut your fucking loudmouth and go an invade Cuba, where
>> probably the majority of the citizens would welcome being American,
>> having lost their love of Marxist austerity and Che Guevara?
>
> If an oppressive government is starving its people and
> arresting/torturing/killing dissidents, do the developed countries of
> the world have a moral obligation to intervene?
>
> North Korea. Cuba. Haiti. Zimbabwe. Many others.
>
> I think so.

Do you feel the same way about them intervening in how
you lot do things, like shoot ups in schools and you ghettos ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697258 — Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 22:53 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<u58c5b$118n2$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#697255
On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 06:11:53 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

-- 
Richard addressing senile Rodent Speed:
"Shit you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll."
MID: <ogoa38$pul$1@news.mixmin.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697338

FromAnthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Date2023-06-01 21:11 -0700
Message-ID<5149bdf7-1f38-4bd5-955e-ca9aadfc323dn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#697209
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 12:08:28 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:39:27 +0100, The Natural Philosopher 
> <t...@invalid.invalid> wrote: 
> 
> >On 31/05/2023 00:01, rbowman wrote: 
> >> You certainly seem to think the Falklands should be yours. I suppose as 
> >> the empire vanished you had to hold on to something for old times sake. 
> >The Falklands have never belonged to anyone else, but Britain, the 
> >Falkland islanders absolutely want to stay British, but Argentina, once 
> >one of the wealthiest countries in the world after ceasing to be part of 
> >Spain, has economic problems and its a convenient distraction for the 
> >government there to claim it 'ought' to be theirs, despite *never ever 
> >having been so*. 
> > 
> >Largely because there may well be oil and gas reserves under it. 
> > 
> >Why don't you shut your fucking loudmouth and go an invade Cuba, where 
> >probably the majority of the citizens would welcome being American, 
> >having lost their love of Marxist austerity and Che Guevara?
> If an oppressive government is starving its people and 
> arresting/torturing/killing dissidents, do the developed countries of 
> the world have a moral obligation to intervene? 
> 
> North Korea. Cuba. Haiti. Zimbabwe. Many others. 
> 
> I think so.

The last time the US thought that was Irak, but it turned out not to have enough money to be able to intervene effectively.

It had got into Afghanistan a bit earlier, and with slightly more justification, and was a bit slower getting out - again because it couldn't afford to  do the job it had set out to do. The US is a bit too prone to take on jobs that it hasn't got the resources to finish off, probably because the people who take on these jobs can't think them through any more carefully than John Larkinln, who likes to think that he designs his electronic circuits.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697176 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 10:16 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<DnDdM.5704621$14z3.2673700@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#697145
On 30 May 2023 23:01:37 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> When you're dealing with the ignorant...

What these groups have to deal with is the trash produced by pathological
heavily medicated demented chatterboxes!

-- 
Yet more of the abnormal senile gossiping by the resident senile gossip:
"I never understood how they made a living but the space where the local 
party store was is now up for lease. It probably was more than helium. I 
often walk over the the adjacent market to get something for dinner and 
people stuffing balloons in their cars was a common sight. No more. I've 
no idea if there is another store in town."
MID: <kafs2nF6vi1U15@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696869

Fromscott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
Date2023-05-29 14:57 +0000
Message-ID<F33dM.3481502$iU59.1103672@fx14.iad>
In reply to#696858
John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> writes:
>On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:54:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
><tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On 28/05/2023 22:36, rbowman wrote:
>>> On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:41:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It gradually gor better but some imported goods remained expensive for a
>>>> long time.  Hitlers U-boats shagged the merchant fleets something
>>>> rotten.
>>> 
>>> Payback for the blockade of Germany that was enforced for 8 months after
>>> the Armistice was a bitch.
>>
>>Well. Germany had sorta really started WWI, and bombed England, France 
>>Belgium and IIRC Holland, so the Allies were somewhat pissed.
>>Then when Germany used all that as an excuse to start WWII, and made a 
>>bloody fucking mess of most of Europe, and quite a lot of Africa and the 
>>middle east, we did get pissed again.
>>We tolerate the USA's colonialism, because at the end of the day its 
>>just business. Nothing against you injuns personally, we just want your 
>>land to grow crops and herd beef on. Its the death and glory boys from 
>>e.g. Russia we don't like.
>
>I think that British and US "colonialism" were both net benefits to
>the world. And, realistically, unavoidable.

I disagree.  European colonialism competition has directly
led to the modern state of affairs in the middle east, far east
and southern hemisphere.  And it continues with with the Russian
invasion of Ukraine today.

Nobody can predict what North America would currently be
in an alternate history where Colonialism didn't exist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 8 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 34  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design


csiph-web