Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #696575 > unrolled thread

Re: v for frequency?

Started by"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com>
First post2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
Last post2023-07-25 10:08 +0200
Articles 20 on this page of 673 — 31 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 11:52 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:02 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:07 +0100
            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:08 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 04:18 -0700
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:34 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:10 -0700
            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:39 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:38 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-27 19:10 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:28 +1000
                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:30 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:20 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-05-27 21:23 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 20:28 +0000
              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:10 +1000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:31 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:50 +0000
              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:42 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:42 -0700
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 03:59 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:32 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 11:55 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:00 -0700
                      Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:36 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:20 +0000
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:40 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:04 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-25 13:40 +0100
                            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 17:41 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:29 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:58 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:57 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-08-11 20:56 +0100
                                Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-08-11 22:51 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:42 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:32 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-28 17:17 -0400
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:33 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:51 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:41 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:02 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:25 -0700
                          Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 19:14 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-27 08:33 -0700
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:32 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:34 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 06:58 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:43 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:03 -0700
                      Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-28 21:20 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:09 +1000
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:15 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:34 +1000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:27 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:11 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:48 +0200
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:47 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:01 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 21:45 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling and Trolling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:18 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:58 +1000
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 03:59 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 +1000
                                        Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:37 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:34 +1000
                                            Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:05 +0200
                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:42 +0100
                                          Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:04 +0200
                                      Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:57 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:39 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:42 +1000
                                            Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:08 +0200
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:07 +0200
                                    Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:00 +0200
                            Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:45 +0200
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:44 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:04 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:11 +1000
                              Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 04:11 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:19 +0200
                        Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:42 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:19 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:31 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:46 +1000
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:25 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:44 +1000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:16 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:06 +1000
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 +1000
                                Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:57 +0200
                              Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:56 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:39 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 22:05 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:20 +0200
                            Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:52 +0200
                          Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:51 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:16 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 07:11 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:20 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:17 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:55 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:04 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:12 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:23 +1000
                                      Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:11 +0200
                                    Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:10 +0200
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:03 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:15 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 07:39 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:20 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:13 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:16 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:58 +0200
                        Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads having at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:49 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 15:59 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:38 -0700
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:39 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:59 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:41 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:36 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:45 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:54 +0100
                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:09 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:13 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 15:30 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:33 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:40 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:46 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:07 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:07 -0700
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:27 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:05 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:36 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:39 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:06 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:37 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:09 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:42 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 08:02 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:01 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-31 02:00 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:39 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:08 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:48 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:08 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:41 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:11 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:53 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-01 21:11 -0700
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:16 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-29 14:57 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 16:38 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:10 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:50 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:11 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:43 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:52 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:19 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:50 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:13 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:22 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:56 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:37 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 17:34 -0400
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:30 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:10 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:54 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 03:27 +1000
                                    Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 03:27 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:08 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:25 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:11 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:38 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:13 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:26 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:44 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:03 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:37 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:04 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:27 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:33 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:21 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 10:15 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:16 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 12:48 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:10 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:24 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:21 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:46 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:23 +0100
                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:39 -0700
                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:43 +0100
                                                Re: The NATURAL IDIOT Alert, again! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:13 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:33 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:02 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:01 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:15 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Pamela <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 11:28 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 03:51 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-03 05:47 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 14:14 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:19 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-04 00:02 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:24 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-04 05:30 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:18 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 15:03 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 15:10 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:56 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> - 2023-06-03 16:54 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 17:57 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:20 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:15 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:22 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:44 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:49 +1000
                                      Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 01:49 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:01 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:37 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:02 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:30 +0000
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:14 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:10 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:03 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:18 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 03:05 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:27 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:23 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:49 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 11:30 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:19 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:18 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:34 +1000
                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 16:00 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-27 12:35 -0400
              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 18:39 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:42 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:01 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:11 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:33 +0000
              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:04 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:03 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:32 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:48 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 20:07 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:38 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 04:50 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-22 23:59 -0400
                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:21 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? jon <jon@nospam.cn> - 2023-07-23 14:41 +0000
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 17:22 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:56 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:33 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 23:25 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-24 05:52 +0100
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 09:55 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 11:03 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:12 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:30 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:06 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-25 08:40 +0100
                                Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:04 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:11 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 21:34 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 17:35 -0400
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:45 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 09:47 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 19:08 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 23:25 -0400
                                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:24 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:52 +0000
                                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:14 +0200
                                              Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:13 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:50 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:13 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:25 +0000
                                              Re: v for frequency? Jim Joyce <none@none.invalid> - 2023-07-26 12:43 -0500
                                                Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-07-26 20:15 +0200
                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-26 12:14 -0700
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:26 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2023-07-31 11:55 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:08 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-26 14:16 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 19:55 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:05 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:52 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:00 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:23 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 11:03 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:44 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 16:57 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:12 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 18:51 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-27 04:58 +0000
                                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-27 10:47 +0200
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:10 +0200
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:02 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 08:35 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 14:50 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 15:17 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 16:26 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:26 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:07 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:43 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:13 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:15 +0100
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:20 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:14 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:13 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:23 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:29 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-23 08:19 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 08:52 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:27 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:28 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:58 +1000
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:15 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:35 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:56 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:28 -0700
              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:10 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-27 04:40 -0700
      Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 13:33 +0000
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:09 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:22 -0700
            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:29 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:14 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:48 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:12 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:26 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 16:30 -0700
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:52 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:49 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:31 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:33 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:50 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:18 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:23 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:36 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:07 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:23 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:26 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 06:45 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:56 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:58 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:45 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:33 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:24 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:56 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:22 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:28 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 09:00 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? Bev <none@forme.com> - 2023-05-29 16:42 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:47 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:28 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:03 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:22 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:21 +1000
                                        Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 19:58 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:22 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 21:38 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:46 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 18:24 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:10 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 19:13 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 19:31 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:52 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:30 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-06-15 01:32 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-15 16:30 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:00 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:25 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:16 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:40 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:02 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 23:00 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 +1000
                                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:46 +0100
                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 10:27 +1000
                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:55 -0700
                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:36 +1000
                                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 22:14 -0700
                                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +1000
                                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 00:37 -0700
                                                      Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 02:23 -0700
                                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 19:55 +1000
                                                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 12:01 +0200
                                                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 13:14 +0000
                                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 14:32 +0100
                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:25 -0700
                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:36 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:41 +0000
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:20 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:24 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 13:03 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:17 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:16 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:26 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:35 +0000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:44 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:24 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:43 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:42 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 18:13 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:19 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 18:04 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:30 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:58 +0100
                                                            Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 15:53 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 16:05 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:12 +0100
                                                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:33 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:14 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:22 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:44 +0200
                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:51 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:38 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:45 +0200
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 +1000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 15:47 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:19 +1000
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 18:10 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:11 +1000
                                                                              Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:24 +0200
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:32 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 01:46 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 14:16 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:27 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 20:08 +0100
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 14:14 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 06:58 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:14 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:31 -0700
                                                                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:23 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 20:41 +0100
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-06-01 20:19 -0400
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 18:01 -0700
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:20 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-02 13:09 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-06-01 14:16 +0000
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 08:43 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:16 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:13 +0100
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 17:42 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 11:10 -0700
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:35 -0700
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 14:22 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 -0700
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 15:13 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 16:04 -0700
                                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:36 +1000
                                                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:44 +0200
                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:42 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:56 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:25 +0200
                                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:45 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 20:00 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:29 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:40 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:08 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:21 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-02 07:23 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 22:51 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-30 08:07 -0700
                                        Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 18:17 +0200
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:58 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:32 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:39 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:32 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 15:17 -0400
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:34 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 11:13 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:26 +1000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:05 +0000
                        Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:01 +0200
                      Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:58 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:00 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:04 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:50 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:01 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:59 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:05 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:20 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:27 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:44 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:47 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 22:20 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:10 -0700
                                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:14 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:14 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-28 14:19 -0400
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 21:20 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 13:33 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:46 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:03 -0700
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:18 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:41 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:03 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 05:41 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:25 +0000
                                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:08 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:44 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-07-29 19:45 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:56 -0700
                                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-30 00:35 +0000
                                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 10:15 +0200
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:12 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 00:43 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 17:24 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 14:14 -0400
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:27 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:48 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:05 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 17:27 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:38 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 18:53 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 21:02 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:42 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:28 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:39 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:29 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:30 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:32 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:10 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:46 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:10 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:14 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:33 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:15 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:52 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 21:59 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:46 +1000
                          Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:46 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:58 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:19 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:54 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-31 23:25 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 08:00 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:44 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 08:08 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 20:00 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 16:58 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:35 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 19:15 -0400
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 03:28 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 14:35 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:26 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 15:00 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:13 +0200
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:10 +0100
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:31 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 09:05 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 16:19 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 10:14 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 17:49 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-06-01 03:17 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:51 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:11 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 01:52 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:23 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:05 -0700
                            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:11 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-28 15:50 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:19 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:40 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 06:05 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:59 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:03 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:28 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 20:15 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:59 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:05 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:38 +0100
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:58 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:55 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 06:57 -0700
              Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:08 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:12 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:38 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-28 21:05 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:50 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:15 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:43 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:35 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:07 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:12 -0700
                  Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-28 23:53 -0700
        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:17 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:57 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:32 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:39 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:02 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 06:19 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:52 +0100
            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:37 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:02 +1000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:34 -0700
            Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:46 +0200
        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:51 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:31 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:53 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:45 +0000
            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:48 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0100
      Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:07 +0200
      Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 12:27 -0400
        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 10:05 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:59 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:58 +0000
          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:50 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 11:24 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-28 11:00 +0000
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 12:28 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 12:59 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:34 +0200
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-29 21:44 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:09 +1000
        Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0200
      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:15 +0100
          Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:09 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:30 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-24 15:49 +0100
              Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 17:39 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:10 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:31 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:07 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-25 07:02 -0700
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:08 +0200

Page 25 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 23 24 [25] 26 27 … 34  Next page →


#697181 — Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 10:25 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<u570a2$qd95$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#697137
On Wed, 31 May 2023 07:56:34 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH 159 !!! lines of trollshit unread again>

-- 
Pomegranate Bastard addressing the trolling senile cretin from Oz:
"I repeat, you are a complete and utter imbecile."
MID: <mpelth1engag7090piqvqp85pco7nphoal@4ax.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697032 — Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<ykidM.6583948$MJk2.4595004@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696977
On Tue, 30 May 2023 09:00:39 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

-- 
Sqwertz to Rodent Speed:
"This is just a hunch, but I'm betting you're kinda an argumentative
asshole.
MID: <ev1p6ml7ywd5$.dlg@sqwertz.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696901

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-29 18:45 +0000
Message-ID<kdka6sFa8tU8@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#696862
On Mon, 29 May 2023 07:22:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

> I suspect that a minority of europeans could often afford cheese 500
> years ago. Malnutrition was usual.

500 years ago was prior to the Industrial Revolution when people were 
herded off the land and into the dark satanic mills. Most would have had 
at least one cow, sheep, or goat. You can only use so much milk so cheese 
was made to store the surplus, or if you really had a surplus, to feed the 
hogs. 

It took industrialization to create widespread malnutrition, or sometimes 
outside forces. Ireland was a net exporter of food during the Famine. The 
beefeaters had to have their beef.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696907

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 20:00 +0100
Message-ID<u52so3$1j43m$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#696901
On 29/05/2023 19:45, rbowman wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 07:22:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
> 
>> I suspect that a minority of europeans could often afford cheese 500
>> years ago. Malnutrition was usual.
> 
> 500 years ago was prior to the Industrial Revolution when people were
> herded off the land and into the dark satanic mills. Most would have had
> at least one cow, sheep, or goat. You can only use so much milk so cheese
> was made to store the surplus, or if you really had a surplus, to feed the
> hogs.
> 
> It took industrialization to create widespread malnutrition, or sometimes
> outside forces. Ireland was a net exporter of food during the Famine. The
> beefeaters had to have their beef.
> 
No. Populations boomed in the industrial age due to better nutrition.

-- 
The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly 
diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential 
survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations 
into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with 
what it actually is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696929

FromJohn Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com>
Date2023-05-29 12:29 -0700
Message-ID<2su97idqkbh1luu5mj4eas7j7rm7fgflc7@4ax.com>
In reply to#696901
On 29 May 2023 18:45:48 GMT, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 29 May 2023 07:22:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>
>> I suspect that a minority of europeans could often afford cheese 500
>> years ago. Malnutrition was usual.
>
>500 years ago was prior to the Industrial Revolution when people were 
>herded off the land and into the dark satanic mills. Most would have had 
>at least one cow, sheep, or goat. You can only use so much milk so cheese 
>was made to store the surplus, or if you really had a surplus, to feed the 
>hogs. 
>
>It took industrialization to create widespread malnutrition, or sometimes 
>outside forces. Ireland was a net exporter of food during the Famine. The 
>beefeaters had to have their beef.

Nobody forced peasants off the land and into factories. They did it
because it improved their lives.

Industrialization gave us tractors, fertilizers, insecticides, trucks,
airplanes, refrigeration, and plant breeding that multiplied crop
yields enormously. The factories paid workers so they could afford the
ag products.

Life spans have over doubled since 1800.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696974

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-05-30 08:40 +1000
Message-ID<op.15p89dzmbyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#696929
On Tue, 30 May 2023 05:29:04 +1000, John Larkin  
<jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

> On 29 May 2023 18:45:48 GMT, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 07:22:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>>
>>> I suspect that a minority of europeans could often afford cheese 500
>>> years ago. Malnutrition was usual.
>>
>> 500 years ago was prior to the Industrial Revolution when people were
>> herded off the land and into the dark satanic mills. Most would have had
>> at least one cow, sheep, or goat. You can only use so much milk so  
>> cheese
>> was made to store the surplus, or if you really had a surplus, to feed  
>> the
>> hogs.
>>
>> It took industrialization to create widespread malnutrition, or  
>> sometimes
>> outside forces. Ireland was a net exporter of food during the Famine.  
>> The
>> beefeaters had to have their beef.

> Nobody forced peasants off the land and into factories.

That did  happen with the clearances in scotland.

> They did it
> because it improved their lives.
>
> Industrialization gave us tractors, fertilizers, insecticides, trucks,
> airplanes, refrigeration, and plant breeding that multiplied crop
> yields enormously. The factories paid workers so they could afford the
> ag products.
>
> Life spans have over doubled since 1800.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697034 — Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<FlidM.3017745$l5R6.1411109@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696974
On Tue, 30 May 2023 08:40:15 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697009

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-30 05:08 +0000
Message-ID<kdlemlF5chlU9@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#696929
On Mon, 29 May 2023 12:29:04 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

> Nobody forced peasants off the land and into factories. They did it
> because it improved their lives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclosure_Acts

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697035 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 10:21 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<PmidM.6910903$SIb3.4472112@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#697009
On 30 May 2023 05:08:37 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclosure_Acts

What off topic sick senile shit is THIS now about, you clinically insane
abnormal senile blabbermouth?

-- 
More of the resident senile bigmouth's idiotic "cool" blather:
"For reasons I can't recall I painted a spare bedroom in purple. It may 
have had something to do with copious quantities of cheap Scotch."
MID: <k89lchF8b4pU1@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697351

FromAnthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Date2023-06-02 07:23 -0700
Message-ID<52b85ab3-a11f-41ad-8002-78c41a226d0an@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#696929
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 5:30:34 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
> On 29 May 2023 18:45:48 GMT, rbowman <bow...@montana.com> wrote: 
> 
> >On Mon, 29 May 2023 07:22:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote: 
> > 
> >> I suspect that a minority of europeans could often afford cheese 500 years ago. Malnutrition was usual. 

Most people who ate cheese ate cheese that they had made.

Most people didn't get enough to eat in winter. Most of the bones dug from that period have starvation rings every winter.
That's seasonal malnutrition.

> >500 years ago was prior to the Industrial Revolution when people were 
> >herded off the land and into the dark satanic mills. Most would have had 
> >at least one cow, sheep, or goat. You can only use so much milk so cheese 
> >was made to store the surplus, or if you really had a surplus, to feed the 
> >hogs. 
> > 
> >It took industrialization to create widespread malnutrition, or sometimes 
> >outside forces.

It happened pretty much every winter. the bones don't lie.

> > Ireland was a net exporter of food during the Famine. The  beefeaters had to have their beef.
>
> Nobody forced peasants off the land and into factories. They did it  because it improved their lives. 

The enclosures acts did force peasants off their lands. The factories exploited the labour that became available.
 
> Industrialization gave us tractors, fertilizers, insecticides, trucks,  airplanes, refrigeration, and plant breeding that multiplied crop  yields enormously. The factories paid workers so they could afford the  ag products. 

Science gave us most of that. The British agricultural revolutiuon increased crop yields without any help from industrialisation, and freed up enough agricultural labourers to make the industrial revolution possible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_revolution

Try not to be entirely clueless. 

> Life spans have over doubled since 1800.

Mainly due to wiping out a lot of endemic diseases. Your number is mainly about  chance of surviving childhood which has risen from 50% over most of recorded history to about 96% today.

https://ourworldindata.org/child-mortality-in-the-past

https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/child-mortality-and-causes-of-death

It's technology in general - and not just industrialisation - that has made the difference. If you want to go into Pollyanna mode try to get your facts somewhere near right.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696932

FromGerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de>
Date2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
Message-ID<u52uj9$jpse$1@solani.org>
In reply to#696901
Am 29.05.23 um 20:45 schrieb rbowman:
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 07:22:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
> 
>> I suspect that a minority of europeans could often afford cheese 500
>> years ago. Malnutrition was usual.
> 
> 500 years ago was prior to the Industrial Revolution when people were
> herded off the land and into the dark satanic mills. 

.. and did those feet in ancient times...

> Most would have had
> at least one cow, sheep, or goat. You can only use so much milk so cheese

Same here in the German Saar county where I live. Industry was
iron & coal and the workers families used to have at least a
goat. They were "Bergmann-Bauern", miner-farmers to survive.

> was made to store the surplus, or if you really had a surplus, to feed the
> hogs.
> 
> It took industrialization to create widespread malnutrition, or sometimes
> outside forces. Ireland was a net exporter of food during the Famine. 

Yes, enforced by British military. That makes friends for a
hundred years. Not.

The
> beefeaters had to have their beef.
> 

Gerhard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#702288

From"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com>
Date2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
Message-ID<op.18uddabomvhs6z@ryzen>
In reply to#696932
On Mon, 29 May 2023 20:31:53 +0100, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> wrote:

> Am 29.05.23 um 20:45 schrieb rbowman:
>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 07:22:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>>
>>> I suspect that a minority of europeans could often afford cheese 500
>>> years ago. Malnutrition was usual.
>>
>> 500 years ago was prior to the Industrial Revolution when people were
>> herded off the land and into the dark satanic mills.
>
> .. and did those feet in ancient times...
>
>> Most would have had
>> at least one cow, sheep, or goat. You can only use so much milk so cheese
>
> Same here in the German Saar county where I live. Industry was
> iron & coal and the workers families used to have at least a
> goat. They were "Bergmann-Bauern", miner-farmers to survive.
>
>> was made to store the surplus, or if you really had a surplus, to feed the
>> hogs.
>>
>> It took industrialization to create widespread malnutrition, or sometimes
>> outside forces. Ireland was a net exporter of food during the Famine.
>
> Yes, enforced by British military. That makes friends for a
> hundred years. Not.

Who cares?  They're only Irish, not the sharpest knives in the drawer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#702370

FromAnthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Date2023-07-29 22:51 -0700
Message-ID<e6a4c672-c7c4-4092-a561-5262d63abd5dn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#702288
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 9:40:21 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 20:31:53 +0100, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk...@arcor.de> wrote: 
> > Am 29.05.23 um 20:45 schrieb rbowman: 
> >> On Mon, 29 May 2023 07:22:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote: 

<snip>

> > Yes, enforced by British military. That makes friends for a  hundred years. Not.
>
> Who cares? They're only Irish, not the sharpest knives in the drawer.

One would have thought that the Scottish wanker would be aware of the highland clearances that sent a lot of the more intelligent highland Scots to Canada and New Zealand. The smarter Irish went to Australia.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#702405

FromJohn Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com>
Date2023-07-30 08:07 -0700
Message-ID<jpuccidejtuahs3lije0he8af2g5dvgo52@4ax.com>
In reply to#702288
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 12:40:12 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 29 May 2023 20:31:53 +0100, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 29.05.23 um 20:45 schrieb rbowman:
>>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 07:22:25 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> I suspect that a minority of europeans could often afford cheese 500
>>>> years ago. Malnutrition was usual.
>>>
>>> 500 years ago was prior to the Industrial Revolution when people were
>>> herded off the land and into the dark satanic mills.
>>
>> .. and did those feet in ancient times...
>>
>>> Most would have had
>>> at least one cow, sheep, or goat. You can only use so much milk so cheese
>>
>> Same here in the German Saar county where I live. Industry was
>> iron & coal and the workers families used to have at least a
>> goat. They were "Bergmann-Bauern", miner-farmers to survive.
>>
>>> was made to store the surplus, or if you really had a surplus, to feed the
>>> hogs.
>>>
>>> It took industrialization to create widespread malnutrition, or sometimes
>>> outside forces. Ireland was a net exporter of food during the Famine.
>>
>> Yes, enforced by British military. That makes friends for a
>> hundred years. Not.
>
>Who cares?  They're only Irish, not the sharpest knives in the drawer.

One of my customers is Irish. They make the best scientific CCD and
ICCD cameras in the world.

The Irish are practical and make good engineers and, occasionally,
scientists.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Irish_scientists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#702417 — Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-07-30 18:17 +0200
SubjectRe: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert!
Message-ID<13wxM.14222$m8Ke.4957@fx08.iad>
In reply to#702405
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 08:07:13 -0700, John Larkin, another obviously brain
dead, troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered:


> One of my customers is Irish. 

Your best customer is the unwashed trolling Scottish wanker that you keep
sucking off with a vengeance, you troll-feeding senile shithead!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696933 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<Z47dM.5116988$odm4.3303567@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696901
On 29 May 2023 18:45:48 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> 500 years ago was prior to the Industrial Revolution when people were 

Oh, FUCK! The resident bigmouth is at it again! LMAO

<FLUSH rest of the usual verbose senile crap unread again>

-- 
More of the resident senile gossip's absolutely idiotic endless blather
about herself:
"My family and I traveled cross country in '52, going out on the northern 
route and returning mostly on Rt 66. We also traveled quite a bit as the 
interstates were being built. It might have been slower but it was a lot 
more interesting. Even now I prefer what William Least Heat-Moon called 
the blue highways but it's difficult. Around here there are remnants of 
the Mullan Road as frontage roads but I-90 was laid over most of it so 
there is no continuous route. So far 93 hasn't been destroyed."
MID: <kae9ivF7suU1@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696906

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-05-30 04:58 +1000
Message-ID<op.15pyzmlkbyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#696862
On Tue, 30 May 2023 00:22:25 +1000, John Larkin  
<jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 May 2023 14:56:37 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 29/05/2023 14:45, John Larkin wrote:
>>> The USA is more than  Kraft now.
>>>
>> Only took them 500 years.
>
> "Them" ?
>
> I wonder what French or Italian or English cheese was like 500 years
> ago.

Mostly pretty much the same as now.

> I know that many dairy products transmitted diseases.

Nope, that's the reason cheese was invented.

> (In the US, most states require all dairy products to be pasteurized
> or equivalent.)

> I suspect that a minority of europeans could often afford cheese 500
> years ago.

You'd be wrong about that. Most would have had cows and goats.

> Malnutrition was usual.

Not because they couldnt afford cheese.

> Cheap cheese and expensive cheese are options now. Some people like
> boxed mac+cheese, especially kids. You have permission to buy or cook
> something else.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696934 — Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 21:32 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<s57dM.5047087$US27.3762798@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696906
On Tue, 30 May 2023 04:58:24 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#702287

From"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com>
Date2023-07-29 12:39 +0100
Message-ID<op.18udb1snmvhs6z@ryzen>
In reply to#696862
On Mon, 29 May 2023 15:22:25 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 May 2023 14:56:37 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 29/05/2023 14:45, John Larkin wrote:
>>> The USA is more than  Kraft now.
>>>
>> Only took them 500 years.
>
> "Them" ?
>
> I wonder what French or Italian or English cheese was like 500 years
> ago. I know that many dairy products transmitted diseases.
>
> (In the US, most states require all dairy products to be pasteurized
> or equivalent.)

Americans are really soft.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696899

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-29 18:32 +0000
Message-ID<kdk9dhFa8tU6@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#696852
On Mon, 29 May 2023 06:45:13 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

>  Tillamook cheddar
> from Oregon is as good as any import.

Their block cheddar isn't bad as a utility cheese. The Makers Reserve is 
good, if you can find it. In this market I get the Kerrygold Dubliner if I 
want a nice sharp cheese even if it isn't technically cheddar or their 
Reserve Cheddar if I can find it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 25 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 23 24 [25] 26 27 … 34  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design


csiph-web