Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #696575 > unrolled thread

Re: v for frequency?

Started by"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com>
First post2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
Last post2023-07-25 10:08 +0200
Articles 20 on this page of 673 — 31 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 11:52 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:02 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:07 +0100
            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:08 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 04:18 -0700
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:34 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:10 -0700
            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:39 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:38 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-27 19:10 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:28 +1000
                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:30 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:20 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-05-27 21:23 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 20:28 +0000
              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:10 +1000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:31 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:50 +0000
              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:42 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:42 -0700
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 03:59 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:32 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 11:55 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:00 -0700
                      Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:36 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:20 +0000
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:40 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:04 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-25 13:40 +0100
                            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 17:41 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:29 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:58 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:57 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-08-11 20:56 +0100
                                Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-08-11 22:51 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:42 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:32 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-28 17:17 -0400
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:33 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:51 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:41 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:02 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:25 -0700
                          Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 19:14 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-27 08:33 -0700
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:32 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:34 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 06:58 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:43 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:03 -0700
                      Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-28 21:20 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:09 +1000
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:15 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:34 +1000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:27 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:11 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:48 +0200
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:47 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:01 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 21:45 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling and Trolling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:18 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:58 +1000
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 03:59 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 +1000
                                        Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:37 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:34 +1000
                                            Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:05 +0200
                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:42 +0100
                                          Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:04 +0200
                                      Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:57 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:39 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:42 +1000
                                            Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:08 +0200
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:07 +0200
                                    Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:00 +0200
                            Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:45 +0200
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:44 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:04 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:11 +1000
                              Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 04:11 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:19 +0200
                        Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:42 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:19 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:31 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:46 +1000
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:25 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:44 +1000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:16 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:06 +1000
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 +1000
                                Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:57 +0200
                              Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:56 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:39 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 22:05 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:20 +0200
                            Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:52 +0200
                          Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:51 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:16 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 07:11 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:20 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:17 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:55 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:04 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:12 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:23 +1000
                                      Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:11 +0200
                                    Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:10 +0200
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:03 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:15 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 07:39 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:20 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:13 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:16 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:58 +0200
                        Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads having at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:49 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 15:59 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:38 -0700
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:39 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:59 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:41 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:36 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:45 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:54 +0100
                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:09 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:13 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 15:30 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:33 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:40 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:46 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:07 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:07 -0700
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:27 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:05 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:36 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:39 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:06 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:37 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:09 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:42 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 08:02 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:01 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-31 02:00 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:39 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:08 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:48 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:08 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:41 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:11 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:53 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-01 21:11 -0700
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:16 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-29 14:57 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 16:38 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:10 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:50 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:11 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:43 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:52 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:19 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:50 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:13 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:22 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:56 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:37 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 17:34 -0400
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:30 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:10 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:54 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 03:27 +1000
                                    Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 03:27 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:08 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:25 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:11 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:38 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:13 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:26 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:44 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:03 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:37 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:04 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:27 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:33 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:21 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 10:15 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:16 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 12:48 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:10 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:24 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:21 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:46 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:23 +0100
                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:39 -0700
                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:43 +0100
                                                Re: The NATURAL IDIOT Alert, again! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:13 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:33 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:02 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:01 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:15 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Pamela <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 11:28 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 03:51 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-03 05:47 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 14:14 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:19 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-04 00:02 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:24 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-04 05:30 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:18 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 15:03 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 15:10 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:56 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> - 2023-06-03 16:54 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 17:57 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:20 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:15 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:22 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:44 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:49 +1000
                                      Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 01:49 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:01 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:37 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:02 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:30 +0000
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:14 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:10 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:03 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:18 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 03:05 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:27 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:23 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:49 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 11:30 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:19 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:18 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:34 +1000
                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 16:00 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-27 12:35 -0400
              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 18:39 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:42 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:01 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:11 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:33 +0000
              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:04 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:03 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:32 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:48 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 20:07 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:38 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 04:50 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-22 23:59 -0400
                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:21 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? jon <jon@nospam.cn> - 2023-07-23 14:41 +0000
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 17:22 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:56 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:33 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 23:25 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-24 05:52 +0100
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 09:55 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 11:03 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:12 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:30 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:06 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-25 08:40 +0100
                                Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:04 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:11 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 21:34 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 17:35 -0400
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:45 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 09:47 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 19:08 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 23:25 -0400
                                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:24 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:52 +0000
                                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:14 +0200
                                              Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:13 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:50 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:13 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:25 +0000
                                              Re: v for frequency? Jim Joyce <none@none.invalid> - 2023-07-26 12:43 -0500
                                                Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-07-26 20:15 +0200
                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-26 12:14 -0700
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:26 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2023-07-31 11:55 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:08 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-26 14:16 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 19:55 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:05 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:52 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:00 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:23 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 11:03 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:44 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 16:57 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:12 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 18:51 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-27 04:58 +0000
                                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-27 10:47 +0200
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:10 +0200
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:02 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 08:35 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 14:50 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 15:17 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 16:26 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:26 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:07 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:43 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:13 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:15 +0100
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:20 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:14 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:13 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:23 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:29 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-23 08:19 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 08:52 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:27 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:28 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:58 +1000
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:15 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:35 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:56 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:28 -0700
              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:10 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-27 04:40 -0700
      Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 13:33 +0000
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:09 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:22 -0700
            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:29 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:14 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:48 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:12 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:26 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 16:30 -0700
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:52 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:49 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:31 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:33 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:50 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:18 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:23 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:36 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:07 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:23 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:26 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 06:45 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:56 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:58 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:45 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:33 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:24 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:56 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:22 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:28 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 09:00 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? Bev <none@forme.com> - 2023-05-29 16:42 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:47 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:28 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:03 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:22 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:21 +1000
                                        Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 19:58 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:22 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 21:38 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:46 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 18:24 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:10 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 19:13 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 19:31 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:52 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:30 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-06-15 01:32 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-15 16:30 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:00 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:25 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:16 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:40 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:02 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 23:00 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 +1000
                                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:46 +0100
                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 10:27 +1000
                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:55 -0700
                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:36 +1000
                                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 22:14 -0700
                                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +1000
                                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 00:37 -0700
                                                      Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 02:23 -0700
                                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 19:55 +1000
                                                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 12:01 +0200
                                                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 13:14 +0000
                                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 14:32 +0100
                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:25 -0700
                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:36 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:41 +0000
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:20 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:24 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 13:03 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:17 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:16 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:26 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:35 +0000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:44 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:24 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:43 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:42 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 18:13 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:19 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 18:04 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:30 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:58 +0100
                                                            Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 15:53 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 16:05 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:12 +0100
                                                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:33 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:14 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:22 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:44 +0200
                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:51 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:38 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:45 +0200
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 +1000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 15:47 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:19 +1000
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 18:10 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:11 +1000
                                                                              Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:24 +0200
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:32 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 01:46 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 14:16 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:27 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 20:08 +0100
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 14:14 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 06:58 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:14 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:31 -0700
                                                                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:23 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 20:41 +0100
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-06-01 20:19 -0400
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 18:01 -0700
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:20 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-02 13:09 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-06-01 14:16 +0000
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 08:43 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:16 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:13 +0100
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 17:42 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 11:10 -0700
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:35 -0700
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 14:22 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 -0700
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 15:13 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 16:04 -0700
                                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:36 +1000
                                                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:44 +0200
                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:42 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:56 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:25 +0200
                                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:45 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 20:00 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:29 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:40 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:08 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:21 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-02 07:23 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 22:51 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-30 08:07 -0700
                                        Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 18:17 +0200
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:58 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:32 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:39 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:32 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 15:17 -0400
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:34 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 11:13 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:26 +1000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:05 +0000
                        Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:01 +0200
                      Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:58 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:00 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:04 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:50 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:01 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:59 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:05 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:20 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:27 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:44 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:47 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 22:20 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:10 -0700
                                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:14 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:14 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-28 14:19 -0400
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 21:20 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 13:33 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:46 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:03 -0700
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:18 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:41 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:03 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 05:41 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:25 +0000
                                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:08 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:44 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-07-29 19:45 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:56 -0700
                                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-30 00:35 +0000
                                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 10:15 +0200
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:12 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 00:43 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 17:24 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 14:14 -0400
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:27 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:48 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:05 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 17:27 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:38 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 18:53 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 21:02 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:42 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:28 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:39 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:29 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:30 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:32 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:10 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:46 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:10 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:14 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:33 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:15 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:52 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 21:59 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:46 +1000
                          Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:46 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:58 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:19 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:54 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-31 23:25 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 08:00 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:44 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 08:08 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 20:00 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 16:58 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:35 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 19:15 -0400
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 03:28 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 14:35 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:26 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 15:00 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:13 +0200
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:10 +0100
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:31 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 09:05 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 16:19 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 10:14 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 17:49 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-06-01 03:17 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:51 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:11 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 01:52 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:23 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:05 -0700
                            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:11 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-28 15:50 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:19 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:40 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 06:05 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:59 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:03 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:28 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 20:15 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:59 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:05 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:38 +0100
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:58 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:55 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 06:57 -0700
              Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:08 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:12 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:38 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-28 21:05 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:50 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:15 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:43 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:35 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:07 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:12 -0700
                  Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-28 23:53 -0700
        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:17 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:57 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:32 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:39 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:02 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 06:19 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:52 +0100
            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:37 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:02 +1000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:34 -0700
            Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:46 +0200
        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:51 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:31 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:53 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:45 +0000
            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:48 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0100
      Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:07 +0200
      Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 12:27 -0400
        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 10:05 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:59 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:58 +0000
          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:50 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 11:24 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-28 11:00 +0000
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 12:28 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 12:59 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:34 +0200
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-29 21:44 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:09 +1000
        Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0200
      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:15 +0100
          Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:09 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:30 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-24 15:49 +0100
              Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 17:39 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:10 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:31 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:07 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-25 07:02 -0700
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:08 +0200

Page 4 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 34  Next page →


#696827 — Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 09:48 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<5NYcM.1639056$5Fj1.1596500@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696819
On Mon, 29 May 2023 17:11:11 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

-- 
Sqwertz to Rodent Speed:
"This is just a hunch, but I'm betting you're kinda an argumentative
asshole.
MID: <ev1p6ml7ywd5$.dlg@sqwertz.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696826 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 09:47 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<LMYcM.2747477$THq2.620671@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696816
On 29 May 2023 06:27:00 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> I'm talking about 

You GOSSIP about EVERYTHING, you subnormal senile gossip and bigmouthed
armchair warrior who admitted he had never been in the army! LOL

-- 
More absolutely idiotic blather by the resident senile gossip:
"My mother sometimes made a cherry chiffon cake that started with a 
packaged mix. It wasn't bad if you squished a slice down to resemble real 
cake."
MID: <kaldt8F22l6U12@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696839

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 11:01 +0100
Message-ID<u51t6k$1btle$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#696816
On 29/05/2023 07:27, rbowman wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 13:34:16 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
> 
> 
>>> Western Europe doesn't have the wherewithal to have a good, old
>>> fashioned war.
>>
>> Pity about WW1 and all the wars there before that.
> 
> I'm talking about here and now. 'does not' indicates the present tense.
> 
>   
>>> That may be why they're so fascinated with a proxy war in eastern
>>> Europe.
>>
>> Nope, that's because they noticed what happened when no one did anything
>> about Hitler's invasions until he invaded Poland.
> 
> How did Britain's guarantees work out for Poland?
Not well, as by the time the war ended Britain was in no position to 
keep any promises, and The USA and Russia let Stalin have Eastern Europe.

It took massive campaigning by Churchill to alert the USA to the basic 
fact that Stalin wanted do do wjat Hitler had failed to do - incorprate 
all of Europe into a colonial empire.


>   
>>> Britain still thinks it's in a position to affect the balance of power
>>> on the continent.
>>
>> Bullshit.
> 
> https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-61052643
> 
> Johnson couldn't even help himself but he egged on Zelensky. Sunak is
> continuing the tradition.

Once again, we see a danger that the USA does not, by and large. Russia 
under Putin has reawakened its desire to be grand master of Europe, has 
massively influenced and controlled and helped the development of the EU 
towards a centralised bureaucratic state, such as Russia espouses, and 
has compromised bribed and blackmailed politicians throughout Europe 
(and indeed the USA) to further its geopolitical interests.
Its main enemies are those European NATO states such as Poland, Estonia, 
Latvia,  Lithuania, and indeed Finland, who know exactly what it is like 
to be part of its Empire.
Germany of course was pretty much run by Russia under Frau Merkel, the 
Russian supported  (allegedly ex-) communist. It is in a very difficult 
situation, as is Hungary.
The West at the level of real geopolitics has understood that Ukraine 
represents an opportunity to essentlally de-Nazify and de-militarise 
Russia, at remarkably little cost.
They supply the obsolescent surplus military kit, and Ukraine supplies 
the casualties.
Its all very well to raid the scrap bin for military hardware about to 
be scrapped anyway, and sell it to Ukraine, and the utter failure of 
Russian technology has ruined *their* export market for arms.

But of course the West is still riddled with people who are in Russia's 
pay, or being blackmailed even if they think they are not, who parrot 
the Kremlin propaganda lines that:

Zelensky and Ukraine are corrupt
Ukraine is part of Russia
Why should the West spend all that money defending it?
Its none of our business.
They will Thcweam and Thcweam until they are Thick and drop Nukes on Alaska.
Ukraine cannot win
Russia cannot lose.

Etc. Etc.
Those of us who spend time examining the online trolls  are utterly 
aware of the instructions given to the on-line trolls and to Russian 
fifth columnists in the Western media, as these spun narratives start 
first on the Russian state propganda channels and then appear all over 
the western media, and in the mouths of US politicians.

Russia has been gaslighting the West for decades, supporting and 
purchasing or blackmailing politicians in all parties, media influencers 
and radical organizations. With the sole object of creating dissension 
hatred and polarisation.

It doesn't support the left or the right. It supports a civil war 
between them.

I bet you thought you did it all by yourselves.

In reality however, it made the fatal mistake of believing its own 
bullshit, and finally overreached itself and is now facing annihilation.

What will be interesting, is how much of the modern politically correct 
'woke' bullshit and EcoBollox, will get annihilated with it, once 
starved of funding...


-- 
Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich 
people by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason 
they are poor.

Peter Thompson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696967

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-29 21:45 +0000
Message-ID<kdkknhF1jptU6@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#696839
On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:01:56 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> Not well, as by the time the war ended Britain was in no position to
> keep any promises, and The USA and Russia let Stalin have Eastern
> Europe.

Nor was it in a position when Poland was invaded. I see Ukraine in a 
similar position, refusing to negotiate since Zelensky believes the west 
has his back. If interest wanes...

> It took massive campaigning by Churchill to alert the USA to the basic
> fact that Stalin wanted do do wjat Hitler had failed to do - incorprate
> all of Europe into a colonial empire.

There always was the gamesmanship going back to before the Triple Entente, 
playing Russia against Germany. The US was either to stupid to play or 
wanted the USSR as a counterweight. They should have known Stalin's 
'socialism in one country' wasn't going to last. It was a temporary stance 
when trying to export communism to Europe failed. 

That was followed by the 'oh shit!' moment when the US realized that 
turning what was left of Germany into the backward farming community 
envisioned by Morgenthau wasn't going to work.

There was also a clear message during the Hungarian Revolution. Whether or 
not the CIA and RFE played a part in it, the 'our thoughts and prayers are 
with you' showed the rest of the nations they were on their own. 


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696970 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling and Trolling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 00:18 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling and Trolling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<zx9dM.5049785$US27.3093860@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696967
On 29 May 2023 21:45:21 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Nor was it in a position when Poland was invaded. I see Ukraine in a 
> similar position, refusing to negotiate since Zelensky believes the west 
> has his back. If interest wanes...

Tell everyone again about how Nazi Germany wanted nothing but "to build a
road to East Prussia", you perverted bigmouthed Nazi-sympathizer! LOL

-- 
Trump-, Hitler- and Putin-sympathizer lowbrowwoman about Nazi-Germany's good
intentions:
"At the onset all Germany wanted was to build a road to East Prussia which
had been severed from Germany proper by the Danzig Corridor."
MID: <kabnetFft5qU17@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696976

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-05-30 08:58 +1000
Message-ID<op.15p937rtbyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#696967
On Tue, 30 May 2023 07:45:21 +1000, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:01:56 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> Not well, as by the time the war ended Britain was in no position to
>> keep any promises, and The USA and Russia let Stalin have Eastern
>> Europe.
>
> Nor was it in a position when Poland was invaded. I see Ukraine in a
> similar position, refusing to negotiate since Zelensky believes the west
> has his back. If interest wanes...

It won't while ever none of the west except the more rabid ex ukrainians
and their kids are the only ones getting killed. The Ukraine is doing
wonders for their military industrial complexes.

>> It took massive campaigning by Churchill to alert the USA to the basic
>> fact that Stalin wanted do do wjat Hitler had failed to do - incorprate
>> all of Europe into a colonial empire.
>
> There always was the gamesmanship going back to before the Triple  
> Entente,
> playing Russia against Germany. The US was either to stupid to play or
> wanted the USSR as a counterweight. They should have known Stalin's
> 'socialism in one country' wasn't going to last. It was a temporary  
> stance
> when trying to export communism to Europe failed.
>
> That was followed by the 'oh shit!' moment when the US realized that
> turning what was left of Germany into the backward farming community
> envisioned by Morgenthau wasn't going to work.
>
> There was also a clear message during the Hungarian Revolution. Whether  
> or
> not the CIA and RFE played a part in it, the 'our thoughts and prayers  
> are
> with you' showed the rest of the nations they were on their own.
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696989

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-30 03:59 +0000
Message-ID<kdlakkF5chlU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#696976
On Tue, 30 May 2023 08:58:45 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

> It won't while ever none of the west except the more rabid ex ukrainians
> and their kids are the only ones getting killed. The Ukraine is doing
> wonders for their military industrial complexes.

Nice new market for F-16s. I wonder how that big old belly mounted vacuum 
cleaner will do on some of the improvised strips Ukraine uses when their 
normal strip develops big holes?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697003

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-05-30 14:40 +1000
Message-ID<op.15qpyhlkbyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#696989
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote

>> It won't while ever none of the west except the more rabid ex ukrainians
>> and their kids are the only ones getting killed. The Ukraine is doing
>> wonders for their military industrial complexes.

> Nice new market for F-16s. I wonder how that big old belly mounted vacuum
> cleaner will do on some of the improvised strips Ukraine uses when their
> normal strip develops big holes?

They are quite capable of filling in the holes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697019 — Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
SubjectRe: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO!
Message-ID<64idM.3016585$l5R6.845477@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#697003
On Tue, 30 May 2023 14:40:55 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697154

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-30 23:37 +0000
Message-ID<kdnfmbFf9r7U13@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#697003
On Tue, 30 May 2023 14:40:55 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
> 
>>> It won't while ever none of the west except the more rabid ex
>>> ukrainians and their kids are the only ones getting killed. The
>>> Ukraine is doing wonders for their military industrial complexes.
> 
>> Nice new market for F-16s. I wonder how that big old belly mounted
>> vacuum cleaner will do on some of the improvised strips Ukraine uses
>> when their normal strip develops big holes?
> 
> They are quite capable of filling in the holes.

Agreed. And the Russians are quite capable of blowing new ones. It must 
suck to be in the air when somebody shoots the shit out of your home. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697156

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-05-31 10:34 +1000
Message-ID<op.15r88bp1byq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#697154
On Wed, 31 May 2023 09:37:47 +1000, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 30 May 2023 14:40:55 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>
>>>> It won't while ever none of the west except the more rabid ex
>>>> ukrainians and their kids are the only ones getting killed. The
>>>> Ukraine is doing wonders for their military industrial complexes.
>>
>>> Nice new market for F-16s. I wonder how that big old belly mounted
>>> vacuum cleaner will do on some of the improvised strips Ukraine uses
>>> when their normal strip develops big holes?
>>
>> They are quite capable of filling in the holes.
>
> Agreed. And the Russians are quite capable of blowing new ones.

And the Ukrainians are quite capable of shooting down those trying to do  
that.

> It must
> suck to be in the air when somebody shoots the shit out of your home.

That's why they use drones.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697170 — Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 10:05 +0200
SubjectRe: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO!
Message-ID<u56v59$q6ti$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#697156
On Wed, 31 May 2023 10:34:49 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

-- 
Norman Wells addressing trolling senile Rodent:
"Ah, the voice of scum speaks."
MID: <g4t0jtFrknaU1@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697168

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 08:42 +0100
Message-ID<u56tq1$2atk4$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#697154
On 31/05/2023 00:37, rbowman wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 14:40:55 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
> 
>> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>
>>>> It won't while ever none of the west except the more rabid ex
>>>> ukrainians and their kids are the only ones getting killed. The
>>>> Ukraine is doing wonders for their military industrial complexes.
>>
>>> Nice new market for F-16s. I wonder how that big old belly mounted
>>> vacuum cleaner will do on some of the improvised strips Ukraine uses
>>> when their normal strip develops big holes?
>>
>> They are quite capable of filling in the holes.
> 
> Agreed. And the Russians are quite capable of blowing new ones. It must
> suck to be in the air when somebody shoots the shit out of your home.

Actually the Russians are demonstrating that they are less and less 
capable of blowing holes in anything, except their own cities.

Russia is totally cattled*, and it is only a matter of time before it 
collapses. Wait and see.

*Rhyming slang. Cf Cattle Truck.

-- 
The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to 
rule.
– H. L. Mencken, American journalist, 1880-1956

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697169 — Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 10:04 +0200
SubjectRe: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO!
Message-ID<UcDdM.6629488$MJk2.3821605@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#697154
On 30 May 2023 23:37:47 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Agreed. And the Russians are quite capable of blowing new ones. It must 
> suck to be in the air when somebody shoots the shit out of your home.

Putin is a "genius", as your hero Stumpie said, isn't he, you idiotic
bigmouthed Trump-, Putin-, and Hitler sympathizer? <VBG>

-- 
Trump-, Hitler- and Putin-sympathizer lowbrowwoman about Nazi-Germany's good
intentions:
"At the onset all Germany wanted was to build a road to East Prussia which
had been severed from Germany proper by the Danzig Corridor."
MID: <kabnetFft5qU17@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697018 — Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
SubjectRe: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO!
Message-ID<M3idM.6640773$miq3.2149973@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696989
On 30 May 2023 03:59:16 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Nice new market for F-16s. I wonder how that big old belly mounted vacuum 
> cleaner will do on some of the improvised strips Ukraine uses when their 
> normal strip develops big holes?

I only wonder whether a F-16 would fit in your BIG BIG mouth, bigmouth! LOL

-- 
Self-admiring lowbrowwoman telling everyone yet another "thrilling" story
about her great life:
"In a role reversal my mother taught her father to drive. She was in the 
back seat when he took his first test, trying a little telepathy: "release 
the handbrake. release the handbrake'. He didn't, stalled the engine and 
failed. The next time went better."
MID: <kafp0uF6vi1U5@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697048

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 10:57 +0100
Message-ID<u54hal$1uou1$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#696989
On 30/05/2023 04:59, rbowman wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2023 08:58:45 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
> 
>> It won't while ever none of the west except the more rabid ex ukrainians
>> and their kids are the only ones getting killed. The Ukraine is doing
>> wonders for their military industrial complexes.
> 
> Nice new market for F-16s. I wonder how that big old belly mounted vacuum
> cleaner will do on some of the improvised strips Ukraine uses when their
> normal strip develops big holes?

F16s are essentially obsolescent. They would have been mothballed or 
scrapped as newer kit is rolled out.

People are delighted that they have a 'pre loved' value.
-- 
The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to 
rule.
– H. L. Mencken, American journalist, 1880-1956

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697155

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-30 23:39 +0000
Message-ID<kdnfq6Ff9r7U14@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#697048
On Tue, 30 May 2023 10:57:41 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 30/05/2023 04:59, rbowman wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 08:58:45 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
>> 
>>> It won't while ever none of the west except the more rabid ex
>>> ukrainians and their kids are the only ones getting killed. The
>>> Ukraine is doing wonders for their military industrial complexes.
>> 
>> Nice new market for F-16s. I wonder how that big old belly mounted
>> vacuum cleaner will do on some of the improvised strips Ukraine uses
>> when their normal strip develops big holes?
> 
> F16s are essentially obsolescent. They would have been mothballed or
> scrapped as newer kit is rolled out.
> 
> People are delighted that they have a 'pre loved' value.

Like the B-52s they fly. They're scheduled to be replaced by F-35s someday 
soon. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697157

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-05-31 10:42 +1000
Message-ID<op.15r9lij4byq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#697155
On Wed, 31 May 2023 09:39:50 +1000, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 30 May 2023 10:57:41 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> On 30/05/2023 04:59, rbowman wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 May 2023 08:58:45 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>
>>>> It won't while ever none of the west except the more rabid ex
>>>> ukrainians and their kids are the only ones getting killed. The
>>>> Ukraine is doing wonders for their military industrial complexes.
>>>
>>> Nice new market for F-16s. I wonder how that big old belly mounted
>>> vacuum cleaner will do on some of the improvised strips Ukraine uses
>>> when their normal strip develops big holes?
>>
>> F16s are essentially obsolescent. They would have been mothballed or
>> scrapped as newer kit is rolled out.
>>
>> People are delighted that they have a 'pre loved' value.
>
> Like the B-52s they fly. They're scheduled to be replaced by F-35s  
> someday
> soon.

Fantasy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697172 — Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 10:08 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<u56v9m$q8ae$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#697157
On Wed, 31 May 2023 10:42:44 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

-- 
Tim+ about trolling Rodent Speed:
He is by far the most persistent troll who seems to be able to get under the
skin of folk who really should know better. Since when did arguing with a
troll ever achieve anything (beyond giving the troll pleasure)?
MID: <1421057667.659518815.743467.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697171 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 10:07 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<nfDdM.5223446$US27.376557@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#697155
On 30 May 2023 23:39:50 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Like the B-52s they fly. They're scheduled to be replaced by F-35s someday 
> soon.

In which of the three ngs you keep trashing is your latest senile crap on
topic, you pathological bigmouth?

-- 
Self-admiring lowbrowwoman telling everyone yet another "thrilling" story
about her great life:
"In a role reversal my mother taught her father to drive. She was in the 
back seat when he took his first test, trying a little telepathy: "release 
the handbrake. release the handbrake'. He didn't, stalled the engine and 
failed. The next time went better."
MID: <kafp0uF6vi1U5@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 34  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design


csiph-web