Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #402976 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-15 18:40 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-03-17 16:33 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 22 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design
I wish I were smarter Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-03-15 18:40 -0500
Re: I wish I were smarter Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-03-15 16:46 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-03-15 19:05 -0500
Re: I wish I were smarter George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-03-15 18:37 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter dplatt@coop.radagast.org (Dave Platt) - 2016-03-15 17:15 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-03-15 18:36 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2016-03-15 19:48 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-03-16 10:29 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2016-03-16 17:00 -0400
Re: I wish I were smarter John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-03-16 14:26 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-03-16 15:55 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2016-03-16 20:29 -0400
Re: I wish I were smarter Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2016-03-16 17:36 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-03-16 17:41 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-03-18 19:23 +0000
Re: I wish I were smarter Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2016-03-18 19:20 +0000
Re: I wish I were smarter Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-03-17 05:18 +0000
Re: I wish I were smarter John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-03-17 10:11 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-03-17 15:39 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-03-17 15:57 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2016-03-17 16:12 -0700
Re: I wish I were smarter John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-03-17 16:33 -0700
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 18:40 -0500 |
| Subject | I wish I were smarter |
| Message-ID | <L66dnc9C37zoAHXLnZ2dnUU7-fGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in layout". Crap. Crud. Etc. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 16:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vj7heb9an1hkp4doa68gfn71fkr6fhsmvm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #402976 |
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott
<seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote:
>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a
>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in
>layout".
>
>Crap. Crud. Etc.
Nothing like the daily aw shit moment ;-)
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 19:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <L66dnc5C37zfPnXLnZ2dnUU7-fGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #402977 |
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:46:27 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott > <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: > >>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >>layout". >> >>Crap. Crud. Etc. > > Nothing like the daily aw shit moment ;-) > > ...Jim Thompson I'm down to the point now of "how can I bodge this so I can test the rest of the circuit, pending a new, correctly laid out circuit board". But the new, correctly laid out circuit board does have a kelvin- connected current sense resistor, dammit! -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 18:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8b84e168-56cb-4b04-8752-e18636aa6b68@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #402979 |
On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 8:05:27 PM UTC-4, Tim Wescott wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:46:27 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott > > <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: > > > >>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a > >>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in > >>layout". > >> > >>Crap. Crud. Etc. > > > > Nothing like the daily aw shit moment ;-) > > > > ...Jim Thompson > > I'm down to the point now of "how can I bodge this so I can test the rest > of the circuit, pending a new, correctly laid out circuit board". exacto knife, and bits of wire. George H. > > But the new, correctly laid out circuit board does have a kelvin- > connected current sense resistor, dammit! > > -- > > Tim Wescott > Wescott Design Services > http://www.wescottdesign.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dplatt@coop.radagast.org (Dave Platt) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 17:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <l6lmrc-l4t.ln1@coop.radagast.org> |
| In reply to | #402976 |
>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >layout". > >Crap. Crud. Etc. Yeah. I know, the hard way, that if I leave something "for later" and don't make explicit notes about it where I cannot possibly ignore them, I *will* forget the Later. Have had to do a bunch of reworks of various sorts (hardware and software) and enjoy the tangy taste of corvid-burger a few times because of that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 18:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e68fa2ed-e180-4c9e-96bb-991255af0b8c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #402976 |
On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 7:40:42 PM UTC-4, Tim Wescott wrote: > Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a > special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in > layout". > > Crap. Crud. Etc. > > -- > > Tim Wescott > Wescott Design Services > http://www.wescottdesign.com No! (being mostly a bear of little brain.) I always feel I've gotta make X number of mistakes on a project, and the sooner I get them over with, the faster it's done. :^) George H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 19:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1aihebpebhorkrlj5l3f2knrkulknmbr76@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #402997 |
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:36:25 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
<gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:
>On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 7:40:42 PM UTC-4, Tim Wescott wrote:
>> Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a
>> special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in
>> layout".
>>
>> Crap. Crud. Etc.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Tim Wescott
>> Wescott Design Services
>> http://www.wescottdesign.com
>
>No! (being mostly a bear of little brain.)
>I always feel I've gotta make X number of mistakes
>on a project, and the sooner I get them over with,
>the faster it's done. :^)
>
>George H.
The only way to avoid repeating mistakes is to make them the first
time.
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 10:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <sp5jebt96neqd1fe6d92956v0eihekm7pp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #402976 |
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: >Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >layout". > >Crap. Crud. Etc. You might consider having a formal checklist of gotchas for the layout. Schematic notes are limited, and I remove layout-related notes before releasing the schematic, so at some point in the process they disappear. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 17:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <h7ijebljt7au188c1g0audrciakq6fc3p1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #403089 |
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:29:05 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: >On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott ><seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: > >>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >>layout". >> >>Crap. Crud. Etc. > >You might consider having a formal checklist of gotchas for the >layout. Schematic notes are limited, and I remove layout-related notes >before releasing the schematic, so at some point in the process they >disappear. You mean implement ISO9001 ? ;D Cheers
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 14:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4rjjeb5ln40lq2j0rinnhqaic4v0br8ujn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #403123 |
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:00:26 -0400, Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:29:05 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: > >>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott >><seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: >> >>>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >>>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >>>layout". >>> >>>Crap. Crud. Etc. >> >>You might consider having a formal checklist of gotchas for the >>layout. Schematic notes are limited, and I remove layout-related notes >>before releasing the schematic, so at some point in the process they >>disappear. > >You mean implement ISO9001 ? > >;D > >Cheers No, do something that actually improves quality. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bill.sloman@ieee.org |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 15:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7d5f503f-5806-44f9-8887-8fd0451a2322@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403125 |
On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 8:26:29 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:00:26 -0400, Martin Riddle > <martin_ridd@verizon.net> wrote: > > >On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:29:05 -0700, John Larkin > ><jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: > > > >>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott > >><seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: > >> > >>>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a > >>>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in > >>>layout". > >>> > >>>Crap. Crud. Etc. > >> > >>You might consider having a formal checklist of gotchas for the > >>layout. Schematic notes are limited, and I remove layout-related notes > >>before releasing the schematic, so at some point in the process they > >>disappear. > > > >You mean implement ISO9001 ? > > No, do something that actually improves quality. I'm sure that you could implement ISO 9001 and in a way that didn't improve quality, but most people manage to fit something useful into the bureaucratic straight-jacket. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 20:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9gujebdn5kl82ock9or4qt1covjofojv4k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #403134 |
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:55:02 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote: >On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 8:26:29 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:00:26 -0400, Martin Riddle >> <martin_ridd@verizon.net> wrote: >> >> >On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:29:05 -0700, John Larkin >> ><jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: >> > >> >>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott >> >><seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: >> >> >> >>>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >> >>>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >> >>>layout". >> >>> >> >>>Crap. Crud. Etc. >> >> >> >>You might consider having a formal checklist of gotchas for the >> >>layout. Schematic notes are limited, and I remove layout-related notes >> >>before releasing the schematic, so at some point in the process they >> >>disappear. >> > >> >You mean implement ISO9001 ? >> >> No, do something that actually improves quality. > >I'm sure that you could implement ISO 9001 and in a way that didn't improve quality, but most people manage to fit something useful into the bureaucratic straight-jacket. I can see most managers see it as a waste of time, but there are some aspects that would solve a lot of problems. Cheers
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 17:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <975d74bf-caed-4e3a-abe8-eccfbd6eb8d8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403155 |
Den torsdag den 17. marts 2016 kl. 01.30.07 UTC+1 skrev Martin Riddle: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:55:02 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote: > > >On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 8:26:29 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:00:26 -0400, Martin Riddle > >> <martin_ridd@verizon.net> wrote: > >> > >> >On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:29:05 -0700, John Larkin > >> ><jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott > >> >><seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a > >> >>>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in > >> >>>layout". > >> >>> > >> >>>Crap. Crud. Etc. > >> >> > >> >>You might consider having a formal checklist of gotchas for the > >> >>layout. Schematic notes are limited, and I remove layout-related notes > >> >>before releasing the schematic, so at some point in the process they > >> >>disappear. > >> > > >> >You mean implement ISO9001 ? > >> > >> No, do something that actually improves quality. > > > >I'm sure that you could implement ISO 9001 and in a way that didn't improve quality, but most people manage to fit something useful into the bureaucratic straight-jacket. > > I can see most managers see it as a waste of time, but there are some > aspects that would solve a lot of problems. > mostly the problem of other businesses requiring you have it ;) -Lasse
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 17:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b7vjebp44il2uql2d69c0cdecol3q4jqk3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #403158 |
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:36:08 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: >Den torsdag den 17. marts 2016 kl. 01.30.07 UTC+1 skrev Martin Riddle: >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:55:02 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote: >> >> >On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 8:26:29 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote: >> >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:00:26 -0400, Martin Riddle >> >> <martin_ridd@verizon.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:29:05 -0700, John Larkin >> >> ><jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott >> >> >><seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >> >> >>>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >> >> >>>layout". >> >> >>> >> >> >>>Crap. Crud. Etc. >> >> >> >> >> >>You might consider having a formal checklist of gotchas for the >> >> >>layout. Schematic notes are limited, and I remove layout-related notes >> >> >>before releasing the schematic, so at some point in the process they >> >> >>disappear. >> >> > >> >> >You mean implement ISO9001 ? >> >> >> >> No, do something that actually improves quality. >> > >> >I'm sure that you could implement ISO 9001 and in a way that didn't improve quality, but most people manage to fit something useful into the bureaucratic straight-jacket. >> >> I can see most managers see it as a waste of time, but there are some >> aspects that would solve a lot of problems. >> > >mostly the problem of other businesses requiring you have it ;) > > >-Lasse One of our customers dings our quality scores because we aren't ISO9000. But they aren't either. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 19:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nchkjc$n32$2@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #403158 |
Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote: > Den torsdag den 17. marts 2016 kl. 01.30.07 UTC+1 skrev Martin Riddle: >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 15:55:02 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote: >> >> >On Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 8:26:29 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote: >> >> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:00:26 -0400, Martin Riddle >> >> <martin_ridd@verizon.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:29:05 -0700, John Larkin >> >> ><jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott >> >> >><seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >> >> >>>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >> >> >>>layout". >> >> >>> >> >> >>>Crap. Crud. Etc. >> >> >> >> >> >>You might consider having a formal checklist of gotchas for the >> >> >>layout. Schematic notes are limited, and I remove layout-related notes >> >> >>before releasing the schematic, so at some point in the process they >> >> >>disappear. >> >> > >> >> >You mean implement ISO9001 ? >> >> >> >> No, do something that actually improves quality. >> > >> >I'm sure that you could implement ISO 9001 and in a way that didn't improve quality, but most people manage to fit something useful into the bureaucratic straight-jacket. >> >> I can see most managers see it as a waste of time, but there are some >> aspects that would solve a lot of problems. >> > > mostly the problem of other businesses requiring you have it ;) We're doing an ISO implementation at work. It's resulted in managers sparring over email and CCing dozens of people, each citing different sections of the new ISO docs to support what they think is right. It's just going to be a multimillion dollar metric shaped certificate on the wall in the end.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 19:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nchke8$n32$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #403125 |
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:00:26 -0400, Martin Riddle > <martin_ridd@verizon.net> wrote: > >>On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:29:05 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0500, Tim Wescott >>><seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: >>> >>>>Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >>>>special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >>>>layout". >>>> >>>>Crap. Crud. Etc. >>> >>>You might consider having a formal checklist of gotchas for the >>>layout. Schematic notes are limited, and I remove layout-related notes >>>before releasing the schematic, so at some point in the process they >>>disappear. >> >>You mean implement ISO9001 ? >> >>;D >> >>Cheers > > No, do something that actually improves quality. Ha!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 05:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ncdeo3$v57$1@gonzo.alcatraz> |
| In reply to | #402976 |
On 2016-03-15, Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: > Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a > special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in > layout". can't you assign a special footprint for that part while you're entering the schematic. -- \_(ツ)_
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 10:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a3pleb1o8arj1mdu15d48duquq6a2peeqk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #403189 |
On 17 Mar 2016 05:18:59 GMT, Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote: >On 2016-03-15, Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> wrote: >> Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >> special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >> layout". > >can't you assign a special footprint for that part while you're >entering the schematic. Kelvin connection is often just a matter of routing. You can usefully do 4-wire Kelvin to a conventional surface-mount resistor. All you need to do is remember. Our software doesn't deal with footprints in the schematic entry program. Schematic decals are distinct from PCB decals, and the PCB program handles those. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 15:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ncfbm702e9s@drn.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #403238 |
John Larkin wrote...
> Jasen Betts wrote:
>> Tim Wescott wrote:
>>> Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a
>>> special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in
>>> layout".
>>
>> can't you assign a special footprint for that part while you're
>> entering the schematic.
>
> Kelvin connection is often just a matter of routing. You can usefully
> do 4-wire Kelvin to a conventional surface-mount resistor. All you
> need to do is remember.
>
> Our software doesn't deal with footprints in the schematic entry
> program. Schematic decals are distinct from PCB decals, and the PCB
> program handles those.
What!?! You can't assign specific PCB footprints to
various schematic symbols? What package do you use?
--
Thanks,
- Win
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <tmcmeb55mi6i7cj2fa4sj8ajt7lovjed7m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #403277 |
On 17 Mar 2016 15:39:03 -0700, Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote: >John Larkin wrote... >> Jasen Betts wrote: >>> Tim Wescott wrote: >>>> Dammit. I _distinctly_ remember saying "oh, I don't need to make a >>>> special Kelvin connection package on that -- I'll just remember it in >>>> layout". >>> >>> can't you assign a special footprint for that part while you're >>> entering the schematic. >> >> Kelvin connection is often just a matter of routing. You can usefully >> do 4-wire Kelvin to a conventional surface-mount resistor. All you >> need to do is remember. >> >> Our software doesn't deal with footprints in the schematic entry >> program. Schematic decals are distinct from PCB decals, and the PCB >> program handles those. > > What!?! You can't assign specific PCB footprints to > various schematic symbols? What package do you use? PADS. PADS has "parts", and each part references a schematic decal (optionally with gates or some alternate decals) and a PCB decal. The Logic program creates schematic decals, and the Layout program creates pcb decals. A zillion different resistor parts can share the general "resistor" schematic decal but can have different PCB decals. We do have a special 4-wire resistor decal, which has 4 pins instead of two. We create a lot of different parts because a part can have added attributes, like a Highland stock number, which is handy for automatic BOM generation. So we have a zillion different SOT23 nfet parts, and D9 connectors, and opamps, and such that reference a relatively few decals. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc picosecond timing precision measurement jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com http://www.highlandtechnology.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design
csiph-web