Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.electronics.design > #696576 > unrolled thread

Re: v for frequency?

Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 11:48 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 11:59 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-27 04:28 -0700
      Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 13:31 +0000
        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:12 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:40 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 12:22 -0400
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 10:09 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 15:03 -0400
                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:29 -0700
                  Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-27 16:43 -0400
                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 14:17 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 23:07 +0000
                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 20:51 -0700
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:27 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:53 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:30 +1000
          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:21 +0000
            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:30 +0200
          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:28 +0200
        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-06-23 07:11 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-06-23 13:49 +0100
            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-23 15:36 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 04:54 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 16:31 +0100
                Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 18:28 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:32 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 04:55 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-23 08:32 +0100
                Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:11 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 17:29 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-23 19:51 +0100
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 21:05 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:34 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 23:30 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-24 05:53 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-24 15:46 +0100
                          Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 17:20 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-24 16:39 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 20:00 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-07-24 18:15 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:08 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:07 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:34 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:07 +0100
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 09:55 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 08:03 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:54 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:06 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:36 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:05 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 19:52 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 22:12 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:11 +0100
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 09:57 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 07:59 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:54 +0100
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 09:45 +0200
      Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:06 +0200

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#701840 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

On 24 Jul 2023 16:39:06 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Minor detail... Are British bathroom scales calibrated in stones. 'Oh, 
> shit, I gained a stone after eating that cake last week!' Or is it 0.075 
> stone?

You really can't ever get enough of listening to yourself talking so
"brilliantly", can you, you pathological bigmouth, chatterbox and gossip?
LOL

-- 
More of the pathological senile gossip's sick shit squeezed out of his sick
head:
"Skunk probably tastes like chicken. I've never gotten that comparison, 
most famously with Chicken of the Sea. Tuna is a fish and tastes like a 
fish. I will admit I've had chicken that tasted like fish. I don't think I 
want to know what they were feeding it."
MID: <k44t5lFl1k3U4@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701841

In article <ki7np9F4fvoU1@mid.individual.net>,
   rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:46:32 +0100, Max Demian wrote:

> > On 24/07/2023 05:53, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> >> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:30:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> > 
> >>> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint bottle.
> >>> I suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart warrior
> >>> just isn't the same.
> >> 
> >> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
> >> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
> >> people in ounces?
> > 
> > 140 pounds is 10 stone.

> Minor detail... Are British bathroom scales calibrated in stones. 'Oh, 
> shit, I gained a stone after eating that cake last week!' Or is it 0.075 
> stone?

The ones I use measure stones and pounds, but I could change the display to
display Kg.

-- 
from KT24 in Surrey, England -  sent from my RISC OS  4té
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701870

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 19:15:02 +0100, charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

> In article <ki7np9F4fvoU1@mid.individual.net>,
>    rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:46:32 +0100, Max Demian wrote:
>
>> > On 24/07/2023 05:53, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:30:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint bottle.
>> >>> I suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart warrior
>> >>> just isn't the same.
>> >>
>> >> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
>> >> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
>> >> people in ounces?
>> >
>> > 140 pounds is 10 stone.
>
>> Minor detail... Are British bathroom scales calibrated in stones. 'Oh,
>> shit, I gained a stone after eating that cake last week!' Or is it 0.075
>> stone?
>
> The ones I use measure stones and pounds, but I could change the display to
> display Kg.

Mine rotates mechanically, it shows both, in different colours.  I can see them at the same time, you can't, so there!  And no I don't care if mine is wildly inaccurate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701869

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:39:06 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:46:32 +0100, Max Demian wrote:
>
>> On 24/07/2023 05:53, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:30:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint bottle.
>>>> I suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart warrior
>>>> just isn't the same.
>>>
>>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
>>> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
>>> people in ounces?
>>
>> 140 pounds is 10 stone.
>
> Minor detail... Are British bathroom scales calibrated in stones. 'Oh,
> shit, I gained a stone after eating that cake last week!' Or is it 0.075
> stone?

I know what I weigh in stone.  I would never care about putting on a few pounds, since you go up and down by that all the time depending on how hydrated you are.  I wouldn't declare any problem unless I saw an increase of half a stone.

Anyway, who weighs themselves to check weight?  Just look at your stomach, easy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701877

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 04:07:57 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:

> Anyway, who weighs themselves to check weight?  Just look at your
> stomach, easy.

After a weigh-in at the doctor's she looked at me and said "Do you have 
any concrete hidden in your pants?" 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701893

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 04:34:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 04:07:57 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>
>> Anyway, who weighs themselves to check weight?  Just look at your
>> stomach, easy.
>
> After a weigh-in at the doctor's she looked at me and said "Do you have
> any concrete hidden in your pants?"

Are you Homer Simpson?  Have you seen the episode where his flab keeps bouncing, like a car with no dampers on the suspension?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701898 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

On 25 Jul 2023 03:34:51 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> After a weigh-in at the doctor's she looked at me and said "Do you have 
> any concrete hidden in your pants?"

So you are pony-tailed, bearded, bigmouthed, fat and didn't serve in the
army (YOU told us all that). What a nice picture of a self-infatuated,
self-admiring typical senile Yankee bigmouth and braggart!

-- 
More of the pathological senile gossip's sick shit squeezed out of his sick
head:
"Skunk probably tastes like chicken. I've never gotten that comparison, 
most famously with Chicken of the Sea. Tuna is a fish and tastes like a 
fish. I will admit I've had chicken that tasted like fish. I don't think I 
want to know what they were feeding it."
MID: <k44t5lFl1k3U4@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701896

On 24/07/2023 17:39, rbowman wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:46:32 +0100, Max Demian wrote:
> 
>> On 24/07/2023 05:53, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:30:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint bottle.
>>>> I suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart warrior
>>>> just isn't the same.
>>>
>>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
>>> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
>>> people in ounces?
>>
>> 140 pounds is 10 stone.
> 
> Minor detail... Are British bathroom scales calibrated in stones. 

Mine is. Stones and kg.


-- 
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the 
gospel of envy.

Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703201

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:03:29 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On 24/07/2023 17:39, rbowman wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:46:32 +0100, Max Demian wrote:
>>
>>> On 24/07/2023 05:53, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:30:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint bottle.
>>>>> I suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart warrior
>>>>> just isn't the same.
>>>>
>>>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
>>>> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
>>>> people in ounces?
>>>
>>> 140 pounds is 10 stone.
>>
>> Minor detail... Are British bathroom scales calibrated in stones.
>
> Mine is. Stones and kg.

Calibrated isn't the right word.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701868

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:46:32 +0100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> On 24/07/2023 05:53, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:30:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>
>>> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint bottle. I
>>> suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart warrior just
>>> isn't the same.
>>
>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140 pounds
>> instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure people in
>> ounces?
>
> 140 pounds is 10 stone.

But Americans aren't bright enough to use the larger denomination.  140 pounds is an easy one.  Try dividing other numbers by 14 in your head.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701878

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 04:06:41 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:46:32 +0100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 24/07/2023 05:53, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:30:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint
>>>> bottle. I suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart
>>>> warrior just isn't the same.
>>>
>>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
>>> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
>>> people in ounces?
>>
>> 140 pounds is 10 stone.
> 
> But Americans aren't bright enough to use the larger denomination.  140
> pounds is an easy one.  Try dividing other numbers by 14 in your head.


Says the person who multiplies 14 by 14 and gets 140. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701890

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 04:36:49 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 04:06:41 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:46:32 +0100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 24/07/2023 05:53, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:30:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint
>>>>> bottle. I suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart
>>>>> warrior just isn't the same.
>>>>
>>>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
>>>> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
>>>> people in ounces?
>>>
>>> 140 pounds is 10 stone.
>>
>> But Americans aren't bright enough to use the larger denomination.  140
>> pounds is an easy one.  Try dividing other numbers by 14 in your head.
>
> Says the person who multiplies 14 by 14 and gets 140.

I didn't.  I divided 140 by 14 and got 10.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701950

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:05:13 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Original Kinsey quote:

>>>>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
>>>>> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
>>>>> people in ounces?

>>
>> Says the person who multiplies 14 by 14 and gets 140.
> 
> I didn't.  I divided 140 by 14 and got 10.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701953 — Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore!

On 25 Jul 2023 19:52:49 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:

> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:05:13 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:
> 
> Original Kinsey quote:
> 
>>>>>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
>>>>>> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
>>>>>> people in ounces?
> 
>>>
>>> Says the person who multiplies 14 by 14 and gets 140.
>> 
>> I didn't.  I divided 140 by 14 and got 10.

That retarded trolling wanker, retarded as he is, clearly got all you
retarded troll-feeding senile assholes on a leash, yet AGAIN! LMAO

-- 
More of the resident senile gossip's absolutely idiotic endless blather
about herself:
"My family and I traveled cross country in '52, going out on the northern 
route and returning mostly on Rt 66. We also traveled quite a bit as the 
interstates were being built. It might have been slower but it was a lot 
more interesting. Even now I prefer what William Least Heat-Moon called 
the blue highways but it's difficult. Around here there are remnants of 
the Mullan Road as frontage roads but I-90 was laid over most of it so 
there is no continuous route. So far 93 hasn't been destroyed."
MID: <kae9ivF7suU1@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#704238

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 20:52:49 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:05:13 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>
> Original Kinsey quote:
>
>>>>>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
>>>>>> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
>>>>>> people in ounces?
>
>>>
>>> Says the person who multiplies 14 by 14 and gets 140.
>>
>> I didn't.  I divided 140 by 14 and got 10.

Then wrote 14.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701899 — Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore!

On 25 Jul 2023 03:36:49 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Says the person who multiplies 14 by 14 and gets 140.

Says the senile bigmouth who can't get enough of taking the troll's dumbest
baits, just so he can open his big mouth time and again. 

-- 
Yet another thrilling story from the resident senile gossip's thrilling
life:
"Around here you have to be careful to lock your car toward the end of 
summer or somebody will leave a grocery sack full of zucchini in it."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701895

On 24/07/2023 15:46, Max Demian wrote:
> On 24/07/2023 05:53, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:30:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> 
>>> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint bottle. I
>>> suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart warrior just
>>> isn't the same.
>>
>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140 
>> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure 
>> people in ounces?
> 
> 140 pounds is 10 stone.
> 
Kinsey Doesn't Do Sums.
-- 
Gun Control: The law that ensures that only criminals have guns.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#703200

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:59:43 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On 24/07/2023 15:46, Max Demian wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 05:53, Commander Kinsey wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:30:51 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint bottle. I
>>>> suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart warrior just
>>>> isn't the same.
>>>
>>> You dislike saying 2 pints instead of 1 quart, but you'll say 140
>>> pounds instead of 14 stone.  Why not go the whole hog and measure
>>> people in ounces?
>>
>> 140 pounds is 10 stone.
>>
> Kinsey Doesn't Do Sums.

Now try 183 pounds.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701816 — Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore!

On 23 Jul 2023 23:30:51 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> As I've never heard of anyone calling a quart of milk a 2-pint bottle. I 
> suppose it works when describing a 2 pint warrior; a quart warrior just 
> isn't the same.

So for how long will this latest sick trollshit go on, you pathological
bigmouth?

-- 
More typical idiotic senile gossip by lowbrowwoman:
"It's been years since I've been in a fast food burger joint but I used 
to like Wendy's because they had a salad bar and baked potatoes."
MID: <ivdi4gF8btlU1@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#696603 — Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert!

On Sat, 27 May 2023 11:48:56 +0100, Max Dumbian, the REAL dumb, notorious,
troll-feeding senile idiot, blathered again:


> No, because we'd need eyes in our mouths to see the colour change.

LOL!!! It's INVARIABLY as I keep saying: after a short while ALL you
troll-feeding senile ASSHOLES keep sounding as retarded as the retarded
troll you keep feeding!

-- 
Max Dumb having another senile moment:
"It's the consistency of the shit that counts. Sometimes I don't need to 
wipe, but I have to do so to tell. Also humans have buttocks to get 
smeared due to our bipedalism."
MID: <6vydnWiYDoV1VUrDnZ2dnUU78QednZ2d@brightview.co.uk>

And yet another senile moment:
"A fawn bowl will show piss a lot less than a white one."
MID: <tv1of3$1v4qg$1@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design

csiph-web