Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #696575 > unrolled thread

Re: v for frequency?

Started by"Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com>
First post2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
Last post2023-07-25 10:08 +0200
Articles 20 on this page of 673 — 31 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 11:52 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:02 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:07 +0100
            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:08 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 04:18 -0700
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:34 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:10 -0700
            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:39 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:38 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-27 19:10 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:28 +1000
                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:30 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:20 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-05-27 21:23 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 20:28 +0000
              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:10 +1000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:31 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:50 +0000
              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:42 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:42 -0700
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 03:59 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:32 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 11:55 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:00 -0700
                      Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:36 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:20 +0000
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:40 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:04 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-25 13:40 +0100
                            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 17:41 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:29 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:58 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:57 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-08-11 20:56 +0100
                                Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-08-11 22:51 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:42 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:32 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-28 17:17 -0400
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:33 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:51 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:41 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:02 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:25 -0700
                          Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 19:14 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-27 08:33 -0700
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:32 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:34 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 06:58 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:43 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:03 -0700
                      Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-28 21:20 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:09 +1000
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:15 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:34 +1000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:27 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:11 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:48 +0200
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:47 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:01 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 21:45 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling and Trolling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:18 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:58 +1000
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 03:59 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 +1000
                                        Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:37 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:34 +1000
                                            Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:05 +0200
                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:42 +0100
                                          Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:04 +0200
                                      Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:57 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:39 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:42 +1000
                                            Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:08 +0200
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:07 +0200
                                    Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:00 +0200
                            Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:45 +0200
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:44 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:04 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:11 +1000
                              Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 04:11 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:19 +0200
                        Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:42 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:19 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:31 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:46 +1000
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:25 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:44 +1000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:16 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:06 +1000
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 +1000
                                Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:57 +0200
                              Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:56 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:39 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 22:05 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:20 +0200
                            Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:52 +0200
                          Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:51 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:16 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 07:11 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:20 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:17 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:55 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:04 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:12 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:23 +1000
                                      Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:11 +0200
                                    Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:10 +0200
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:03 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:15 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 07:39 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:20 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:13 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:16 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:58 +0200
                        Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads having at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:49 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 15:59 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:38 -0700
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:39 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:59 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:41 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:36 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:45 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:54 +0100
                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:09 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:13 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 15:30 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:33 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:40 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:46 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:07 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:07 -0700
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:27 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:05 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:36 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:39 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:06 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:37 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:09 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:42 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 08:02 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:01 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-31 02:00 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:39 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:08 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:48 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:08 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:41 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:11 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:53 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-01 21:11 -0700
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:16 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-29 14:57 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 16:38 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:10 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:50 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:11 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:43 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:52 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:19 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:50 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:13 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:22 +0200
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:56 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:37 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 17:34 -0400
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:30 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:10 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:54 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 03:27 +1000
                                    Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 03:27 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:08 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:25 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:11 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:38 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:13 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:26 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:44 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:03 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:37 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:04 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:27 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:33 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:21 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 10:15 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:16 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 12:48 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:10 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:24 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:21 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:46 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:23 +0100
                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:39 -0700
                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:43 +0100
                                                Re: The NATURAL IDIOT Alert, again! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:13 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:33 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:02 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:01 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:15 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Pamela <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 11:28 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 03:51 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-03 05:47 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 14:14 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:19 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-04 00:02 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:24 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-04 05:30 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:18 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 15:03 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 15:10 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:56 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> - 2023-06-03 16:54 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 17:57 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:20 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:15 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:22 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:44 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:49 +1000
                                      Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 01:49 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:01 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:37 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:02 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:30 +0000
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:14 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:10 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:03 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:18 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 03:05 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:27 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:23 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:49 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 11:30 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:19 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:18 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:34 +1000
                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 16:00 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-27 12:35 -0400
              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 18:39 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:42 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:01 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:11 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:33 +0000
              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:04 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:03 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:32 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:48 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 20:07 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:38 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 04:50 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-22 23:59 -0400
                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:21 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? jon <jon@nospam.cn> - 2023-07-23 14:41 +0000
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 17:22 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:56 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:33 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 23:25 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-24 05:52 +0100
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 09:55 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 11:03 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:12 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:30 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:06 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-25 08:40 +0100
                                Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:04 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:11 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 21:34 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 17:35 -0400
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:45 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 09:47 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 19:08 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 23:25 -0400
                                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:24 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:52 +0000
                                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:14 +0200
                                              Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:13 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:50 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:13 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:25 +0000
                                              Re: v for frequency? Jim Joyce <none@none.invalid> - 2023-07-26 12:43 -0500
                                                Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-07-26 20:15 +0200
                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-26 12:14 -0700
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:26 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2023-07-31 11:55 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:08 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-26 14:16 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 19:55 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:05 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:52 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:00 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:23 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 11:03 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:44 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 16:57 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:12 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 18:51 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-27 04:58 +0000
                                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-27 10:47 +0200
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:10 +0200
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:02 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 08:35 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 14:50 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 15:17 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 16:26 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:26 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:07 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:43 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:13 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:15 +0100
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:20 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:14 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:13 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:23 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:29 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-23 08:19 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 08:52 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:27 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:28 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:58 +1000
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:15 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:35 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:56 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:28 -0700
              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0200
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:10 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-27 04:40 -0700
      Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 13:33 +0000
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:09 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:22 -0700
            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:29 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:14 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:48 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:12 +0000
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:26 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 16:30 -0700
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:52 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0200
                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:49 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:31 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:33 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:50 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:18 +0000
                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:23 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:36 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:07 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:23 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:26 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 06:45 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:56 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:58 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:45 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:33 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:24 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:56 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:22 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:28 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 09:00 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? Bev <none@forme.com> - 2023-05-29 16:42 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:47 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:28 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:03 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:22 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:21 +1000
                                        Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 19:58 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:22 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 21:38 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:46 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 18:24 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:10 -0700
                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 19:13 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 19:31 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:52 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:30 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-06-15 01:32 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-15 16:30 +0100
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:00 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:25 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:16 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:40 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:02 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 23:00 +0100
                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 +1000
                                          Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:46 +0100
                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 10:27 +1000
                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:55 -0700
                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:36 +1000
                                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 22:14 -0700
                                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +1000
                                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 00:37 -0700
                                                      Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 02:23 -0700
                                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 19:55 +1000
                                                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 12:01 +0200
                                                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 13:14 +0000
                                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 14:32 +0100
                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:25 -0700
                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:36 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:41 +0000
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:20 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:24 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 13:03 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:17 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:16 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:26 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:35 +0000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:44 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:24 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:43 +0100
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:42 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 18:13 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:19 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 18:04 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:30 +0100
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:58 +0100
                                                            Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 15:53 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 16:05 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:12 +0100
                                                            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:33 +0100
                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:14 +0100
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:22 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:44 +0200
                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:51 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:38 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:45 +0200
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 +1000
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 15:47 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:19 +1000
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 18:10 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:11 +1000
                                                                              Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:24 +0200
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:32 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 01:46 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 14:16 +0100
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:27 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 20:08 +0100
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 14:14 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 06:58 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:14 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:31 -0700
                                                                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:23 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 20:41 +0100
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-06-01 20:19 -0400
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 18:01 -0700
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:20 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-02 13:09 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-06-01 14:16 +0000
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 08:43 -0700
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:16 +0100
                                                                          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:13 +0100
                                                                            Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 17:42 +0100
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 11:10 -0700
                                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:35 -0700
                                                                  Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 14:22 -0700
                                                                    Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 -0700
                                                                      Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 15:13 -0700
                                                                        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 16:04 -0700
                                                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:36 +1000
                                                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:44 +0200
                                                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:42 -0700
                                                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:56 +1000
                                                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:25 +0200
                                          Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:45 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 20:00 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:29 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:40 +1000
                                      Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:08 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:21 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-02 07:23 -0700
                                  Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 22:51 -0700
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-30 08:07 -0700
                                        Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 18:17 +0200
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:58 +1000
                                  Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:32 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:39 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:32 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 15:17 -0400
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:34 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 11:13 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:26 +1000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:05 +0000
                        Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:01 +0200
                      Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:58 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:00 +0000
                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:04 +0200
                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:50 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:01 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:59 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:05 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:20 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:27 +0100
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:44 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:47 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 22:20 -0700
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:10 -0700
                                  Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:14 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:14 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-28 14:19 -0400
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 21:20 +0200
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 13:33 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:46 +0000
                                      Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:03 -0700
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:18 +0200
                                      Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:41 +0000
                                        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:03 +0100
                                          Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 05:41 -0700
                                          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:25 +0000
                                            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:08 +0200
                                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:44 +0000
                                          Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-07-29 19:45 +0000
                                            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:56 -0700
                                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-30 00:35 +0000
                                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 10:15 +0200
                                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:12 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 00:43 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 17:24 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 14:14 -0400
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:27 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:48 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:05 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 17:27 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:38 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 18:53 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 21:02 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:42 +0000
                                      Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:28 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:39 +0000
                                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:29 +0200
                                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:30 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:32 -0700
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:10 +0000
                                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:46 +0000
                                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:10 +0200
                                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:14 +0000
                                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:40 +0100
                                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:33 +0000
                                        Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:15 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:52 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 21:59 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
                        Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:46 +1000
                          Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:46 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:58 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:19 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:54 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-31 23:25 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 08:00 +1000
                              Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:44 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 08:08 +0100
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 20:00 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 16:58 +0200
                        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:35 +0000
                          Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 19:15 -0400
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 03:28 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 14:35 +1000
                                Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:26 +0000
                                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 15:00 +0000
                                  Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:13 +0200
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:10 +0100
                          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:31 +0200
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 09:05 -0700
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 16:19 +0000
                              Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 10:14 -0700
                                Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 17:49 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-06-01 03:17 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:51 +0200
                              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:11 +0100
                                Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 01:52 -0700
                        Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:23 +0100
                          Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:05 -0700
                            Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:11 +0200
                            Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-28 15:50 +0000
                            Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:19 +0000
                              Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:40 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 06:05 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:59 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:03 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:28 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 20:15 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:59 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:05 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:38 +0100
                      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:58 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:55 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 06:57 -0700
              Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:08 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:12 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:38 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-28 21:05 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:50 +0000
                    Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:15 +0200
                    Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:43 +0000
                      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:35 +0000
                        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:07 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:12 -0700
                  Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-28 23:53 -0700
        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:17 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:57 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:32 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:39 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:02 -0700
              Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 06:19 +0000
                Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0200
                Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:52 +0100
            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:37 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:02 +1000
            Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:34 -0700
            Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:46 +0200
        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:51 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:31 +0000
            Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:53 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:45 +0000
            Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:48 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0100
      Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:07 +0200
      Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 12:27 -0400
        Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 10:05 -0700
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:59 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:58 +0000
          Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:50 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 11:24 +0100
              Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-28 11:00 +0000
                Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 12:28 +0100
                  Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 12:59 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
        Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:34 +0200
        Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0100
          Re: v for frequency? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-29 21:44 +0100
      Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:09 +1000
        Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0200
      Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
        Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:15 +0100
          Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:09 +0200
          Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:30 +0100
            Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-24 15:49 +0100
              Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 17:39 +0200
              Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:10 +0100
                Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:31 +0000
                  Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:07 +0100
                    Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-25 07:02 -0700
                  Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:08 +0200

Page 9 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 34  Next page →


#696874

FromFredxx <fredxx@spam.uk>
Date2023-05-29 16:38 +0100
Message-ID<u52gtl$1g7m0$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#696869
On 29/05/2023 15:57, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> writes:
>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:54:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 28/05/2023 22:36, rbowman wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:41:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It gradually gor better but some imported goods remained expensive for a
>>>>> long time.  Hitlers U-boats shagged the merchant fleets something
>>>>> rotten.
>>>>
>>>> Payback for the blockade of Germany that was enforced for 8 months after
>>>> the Armistice was a bitch.
>>>
>>> Well. Germany had sorta really started WWI, and bombed England, France
>>> Belgium and IIRC Holland, so the Allies were somewhat pissed.
>>> Then when Germany used all that as an excuse to start WWII, and made a
>>> bloody fucking mess of most of Europe, and quite a lot of Africa and the
>>> middle east, we did get pissed again.
>>> We tolerate the USA's colonialism, because at the end of the day its
>>> just business. Nothing against you injuns personally, we just want your
>>> land to grow crops and herd beef on. Its the death and glory boys from
>>> e.g. Russia we don't like.
>>
>> I think that British and US "colonialism" were both net benefits to
>> the world. And, realistically, unavoidable.
> 
> I disagree.  European colonialism competition has directly
> led to the modern state of affairs in the middle east, far east
> and southern hemisphere.  And it continues with with the Russian
> invasion of Ukraine today.
> 
> Nobody can predict what North America would currently be
> in an alternate history where Colonialism didn't exist.

After my earlier post I was thinking along similar lines. African 
countries were carved up with convenient borders. However many tribes 
would have long standing issues with the neighbours such that a stable 
government was never going to happen.

One genocide comes to mind.
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_genocide

Of course we could blame the Belgians for that. Some myopic people will 
still bury their head and say colonialism was good for Africa!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696910

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-05-30 05:10 +1000
Message-ID<op.15pzj2uubyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#696874
On Tue, 30 May 2023 01:38:30 +1000, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> wrote:

> On 29/05/2023 15:57, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>> John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> writes:
>>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:54:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 28/05/2023 22:36, rbowman wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:41:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It gradually gor better but some imported goods remained expensive  
>>>>>> for a
>>>>>> long time.  Hitlers U-boats shagged the merchant fleets something
>>>>>> rotten.
>>>>>
>>>>> Payback for the blockade of Germany that was enforced for 8 months  
>>>>> after
>>>>> the Armistice was a bitch.
>>>>
>>>> Well. Germany had sorta really started WWI, and bombed England, France
>>>> Belgium and IIRC Holland, so the Allies were somewhat pissed.
>>>> Then when Germany used all that as an excuse to start WWII, and made a
>>>> bloody fucking mess of most of Europe, and quite a lot of Africa and  
>>>> the
>>>> middle east, we did get pissed again.
>>>> We tolerate the USA's colonialism, because at the end of the day its
>>>> just business. Nothing against you injuns personally, we just want  
>>>> your
>>>> land to grow crops and herd beef on. Its the death and glory boys from
>>>> e.g. Russia we don't like.
>>>
>>> I think that British and US "colonialism" were both net benefits to
>>> the world. And, realistically, unavoidable.
>>  I disagree.  European colonialism competition has directly
>> led to the modern state of affairs in the middle east, far east
>> and southern hemisphere.  And it continues with with the Russian
>> invasion of Ukraine today.

>>  Nobody can predict what North America would currently be
>> in an alternate history where Colonialism didn't exist.

Don't buy that given how long they had been going before any white men  
showed up.

> After my earlier post I was thinking along similar lines.

I don't.

> African countries were carved up with convenient borders. However many  
> tribes would have long standing issues with the neighbours such that a  
> stable government was never going to happen.

> One genocide comes to mind.
>    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_genocide

But that was quite unusual.

> Of course we could blame the Belgians for that.

And there is quite a bit of evidence for that.

> Some myopic people will still bury their head and say colonialism was  
> good for Africa!

They do live a lot better than they did before any white man showed up

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696923 — Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<wX6dM.6509539$vSy3.3592776@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696910
On Tue, 30 May 2023 05:10:40 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

-- 
Kerr-Mudd,John addressing the auto-contradicting senile cretin:
"Auto-contradictor Rod is back! (in the KF)"
MID: <XnsA97071CF43E3Fadmin127001@85.214.115.223>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696947 — Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<u5307p$63r5$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#696910
On Tue, 30 May 2023 05:10:40 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

-- 
Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 89-year-old senile Australian
cretin's pathological trolling:
https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/rod-speed-faq.2973853/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696942

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-29 19:50 +0000
Message-ID<kdkdv9Fa8tU16@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#696874
On Mon, 29 May 2023 16:38:30 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

> After my earlier post I was thinking along similar lines. African
> countries were carved up with convenient borders. However many tribes
> would have long standing issues with the neighbours such that a stable
> government was never going to happen.

Kenya seems to be relatively stable no thanks to the Brits that insisted 
on incorporating Somalis despite a plebiscite. Funny how plebiscites are 
only valid if they come out 'right'.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696956 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 22:11 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<YF7dM.6512099$vSy3.76002@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696942
On 29 May 2023 19:50:01 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Kenya seems to be relatively stable no thanks to the Brits that insisted 
> on incorporating Somalis despite a plebiscite. Funny how plebiscites are 
> only valid if they come out 'right'.

Funny how's there NO way to make you shut your stupid gob, you senile
cretin!

-- 
Self-admiring lowbrowwoman telling everyone yet another "thrilling" story
about her great life:
"In a role reversal my mother taught her father to drive. She was in the 
back seat when he took his first test, trying a little telepathy: "release 
the handbrake. release the handbrake'. He didn't, stalled the engine and 
failed. The next time went better."
MID: <kafp0uF6vi1U5@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697043

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 10:43 +0100
Message-ID<u54gge$1ugbs$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#696942
On 29/05/2023 20:50, rbowman wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 16:38:30 +0100, Fredxx wrote:
> 
>> After my earlier post I was thinking along similar lines. African
>> countries were carved up with convenient borders. However many tribes
>> would have long standing issues with the neighbours such that a stable
>> government was never going to happen.
> 
> Kenya seems to be relatively stable no thanks to the Brits that insisted
> on incorporating Somalis despite a plebiscite. Funny how plebiscites are
> only valid if they come out 'right'.
We trend to not favour racists policies.

-- 
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the 
other is to refuse to believe what is true.”

—Soren Kierkegaard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697144

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-30 22:52 +0000
Message-ID<kdnd0iFf9r7U7@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#697043
On Tue, 30 May 2023 10:43:42 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 29/05/2023 20:50, rbowman wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 16:38:30 +0100, Fredxx wrote:
>> 
>>> After my earlier post I was thinking along similar lines. African
>>> countries were carved up with convenient borders. However many tribes
>>> would have long standing issues with the neighbours such that a stable
>>> government was never going to happen.
>> 
>> Kenya seems to be relatively stable no thanks to the Brits that
>> insisted on incorporating Somalis despite a plebiscite. Funny how
>> plebiscites are only valid if they come out 'right'.
> We trend to not favour racists policies.

Oh fuck me flying.  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697177 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-31 10:19 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<dqDdM.6977432$SIb3.2625098@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#697144
On 30 May 2023 22:52:02 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Oh fuck me flying.

Gossip girl, you ARE already SO fucked! If you wouldn't admire yourself so
much, you'd know about it! LOL

-- 
Gossiping "lowbrowwoman" about herself:
"Usenet is my blog... I don't give a damn if anyone ever reads my posts 
but they are useful in marshaling [sic] my thoughts."
MID: <iteioiF60jmU1@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696876

FromJohn Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com>
Date2023-05-29 08:50 -0700
Message-ID<15h97i1654h18m4863mtiu971li4doklrq@4ax.com>
In reply to#696869
On Mon, 29 May 2023 14:57:41 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:

>John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> writes:
>>On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:54:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
>><tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On 28/05/2023 22:36, rbowman wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:41:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> It gradually gor better but some imported goods remained expensive for a
>>>>> long time.  Hitlers U-boats shagged the merchant fleets something
>>>>> rotten.
>>>> 
>>>> Payback for the blockade of Germany that was enforced for 8 months after
>>>> the Armistice was a bitch.
>>>
>>>Well. Germany had sorta really started WWI, and bombed England, France 
>>>Belgium and IIRC Holland, so the Allies were somewhat pissed.
>>>Then when Germany used all that as an excuse to start WWII, and made a 
>>>bloody fucking mess of most of Europe, and quite a lot of Africa and the 
>>>middle east, we did get pissed again.
>>>We tolerate the USA's colonialism, because at the end of the day its 
>>>just business. Nothing against you injuns personally, we just want your 
>>>land to grow crops and herd beef on. Its the death and glory boys from 
>>>e.g. Russia we don't like.
>>
>>I think that British and US "colonialism" were both net benefits to
>>the world. And, realistically, unavoidable.
>
>I disagree.  European colonialism competition has directly
>led to the modern state of affairs in the middle east, far east
>and southern hemisphere.  And it continues with with the Russian
>invasion of Ukraine today.

The modern state of affairs is that most of the world has electricity,
literacy, science, food, medicine, travel, womens and minority rights,
and choices in life. All that descended from the Greeks and
disseminated through colonialism.

The power provided by modern civilization has lagged the morality -
jeeps and guns are ahead of democracy in many places now - but things
will eventually smooth out.

>
>Nobody can predict what North America would currently be
>in an alternate history where Colonialism didn't exist.

It would look like it had looked for 20,000 years or so. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696911

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-05-30 05:13 +1000
Message-ID<op.15pzpifwbyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#696876
On Tue, 30 May 2023 01:50:35 +1000, John Larkin  
<jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 29 May 2023 14:57:41 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
> wrote:
>
>> John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> writes:
>>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:54:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 28/05/2023 22:36, rbowman wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:41:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It gradually gor better but some imported goods remained expensive  
>>>>>> for a
>>>>>> long time.  Hitlers U-boats shagged the merchant fleets something
>>>>>> rotten.
>>>>>
>>>>> Payback for the blockade of Germany that was enforced for 8 months  
>>>>> after
>>>>> the Armistice was a bitch.
>>>>
>>>> Well. Germany had sorta really started WWI, and bombed England, France
>>>> Belgium and IIRC Holland, so the Allies were somewhat pissed.
>>>> Then when Germany used all that as an excuse to start WWII, and made a
>>>> bloody fucking mess of most of Europe, and quite a lot of Africa and  
>>>> the
>>>> middle east, we did get pissed again.
>>>> We tolerate the USA's colonialism, because at the end of the day its
>>>> just business. Nothing against you injuns personally, we just want  
>>>> your
>>>> land to grow crops and herd beef on. Its the death and glory boys from
>>>> e.g. Russia we don't like.
>>>
>>> I think that British and US "colonialism" were both net benefits to
>>> the world. And, realistically, unavoidable.
>>
>> I disagree.  European colonialism competition has directly
>> led to the modern state of affairs in the middle east, far east
>> and southern hemisphere.  And it continues with with the Russian
>> invasion of Ukraine today.
>
> The modern state of affairs is that most of the world has electricity,
> literacy, science, food, medicine, travel, womens and minority rights,
> and choices in life.

> All that descended from the Greeks

Nope.

> and
> disseminated through colonialism.

Nope.

> The power provided by modern civilization has lagged the morality -
> jeeps and guns are ahead of democracy in many places now - but things
> will eventually smooth out.

That remains to be seen.

>> Nobody can predict what North America would currently be
>> in an alternate history where Colonialism didn't exist.

> It would look like it had looked for 20,000 years or so.

Yep.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696925 — Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 21:22 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<u52u1k$5nv5$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#696911
On Tue, 30 May 2023 05:13:56 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

-- 
Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 89-year-old senile Australian
cretin's pathological trolling:
https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/rod-speed-faq.2973853/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696948 — Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
SubjectRe: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Message-ID<u5308u$63tb$1@news.mixmin.net>
In reply to#696911
On Tue, 30 May 2023 05:13:56 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

-- 
Pomegranate Bastard addressing the trolling senile cretin from Oz:
"Surely you can find an Australian group to pollute rather than posting
your unwanted guff here."
MID: <c1pqvgte5ldlo1rn3fpl7igtg4h8i9mk7p@4ax.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696944

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-29 19:56 +0000
Message-ID<kdkeagFa8tU17@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#696876
On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:50:35 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

> The modern state of affairs is that most of the world has electricity,
> literacy, science, food, medicine, travel, womens and minority rights,
> and choices in life. All that descended from the Greeks and disseminated
> through colonialism.

https://www.insideedition.com/texas-high-school-graduation-postponed-
after-only-5-seniors-qualify-for-diploma-81663

Please explain how eastern Asia benefited from the wisdom of a bunch of 
dead Greeks? Or India. You are aware that India influenced Greek 
philosophy, not vice versa.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696959 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-29 22:37 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<k28dM.5699337$14z3.4930277@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696944
On 29 May 2023 19:56:00 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> https://www.insideedition.com/texas-high-school-graduation-postponed-
> after-only-5-seniors-qualify-for-diploma-81663
> 
> Please explain how eastern Asia benefited from the wisdom of a bunch of 
> dead Greeks? Or India. You are aware that India influenced Greek 
> philosophy, not vice versa.

Please keep your off topic senile shit out of these newsgroups, willya, you
pathological bigmouth? Of course, you won't! You are SICK, after all! LOL

-- 
And yet another idiotic "cool" line, this time about the UK, from the
resident bigmouthed all-American superhero:
"You could dump the entire 93,628 square miles in eastern Montana and only
the prairie dogs would notice."
MID: <ka2vrlF6c5uU1@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696966

FromEd P <esp@snet.xxx>
Date2023-05-29 17:34 -0400
Message-ID<wT8dM.751442$5CY7.469065@fx46.iad>
In reply to#696944
On 5/29/2023 3:56 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:50:35 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
> 
>> The modern state of affairs is that most of the world has electricity,
>> literacy, science, food, medicine, travel, womens and minority rights,
>> and choices in life. All that descended from the Greeks and disseminated
>> through colonialism.
> 
> https://www.insideedition.com/texas-high-school-graduation-postponed-
> after-only-5-seniors-qualify-for-diploma-81663
> 
> Please explain how eastern Asia benefited from the wisdom of a bunch of
> dead Greeks? Or India. You are aware that India influenced Greek
> philosophy, not vice versa.

I don't see how that could have happened.  That was even before MySpace, 
let alone Facebook.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#696995

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2023-05-30 04:30 +0000
Message-ID<kdlcepF5chlU5@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#696966
On Mon, 29 May 2023 17:34:20 -0400, Ed P wrote:

> On 5/29/2023 3:56 PM, rbowman wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:50:35 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>> 
>>> The modern state of affairs is that most of the world has electricity,
>>> literacy, science, food, medicine, travel, womens and minority rights,
>>> and choices in life. All that descended from the Greeks and
>>> disseminated through colonialism.
>> 
>> https://www.insideedition.com/texas-high-school-graduation-postponed-
>> after-only-5-seniors-qualify-for-diploma-81663
>> 
>> Please explain how eastern Asia benefited from the wisdom of a bunch of
>> dead Greeks? Or India. You are aware that India influenced Greek
>> philosophy, not vice versa.
> 
> I don't see how that could have happened.  That was even before MySpace,
> let alone Facebook.

Sadly, that's what it's coming down to. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697023 — Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip

FromPeeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 10:10 +0200
SubjectRe: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip
Message-ID<rcidM.6538625$vSy3.5532044@usenetxs.com>
In reply to#696995
On 30 May 2023 04:30:17 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:

> Sadly, that's what it's coming down to.

Sadly, all it comes down to, is that you have no control over your big
mouth. You ARE heavily medicated aren't you, psycho? It's simply not
possible that an undrugged person blathers away as idiotically and obsessed
as you do!

-- 
Trump-, Hitler- and Putin-sympathizer lowbrowwoman about Nazi-Germany's good
intentions:
"At the onset all Germany wanted was to build a road to East Prussia which
had been severed from Germany proper by the Danzig Corridor."
MID: <kabnetFft5qU17@mid.individual.net>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697046

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-05-30 10:54 +0100
Message-ID<u54h4i$1uou1$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#696966
On 29/05/2023 22:34, Ed P wrote:
> On 5/29/2023 3:56 PM, rbowman wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:50:35 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>>
>>> The modern state of affairs is that most of the world has electricity,
>>> literacy, science, food, medicine, travel, womens and minority rights,
>>> and choices in life. All that descended from the Greeks and disseminated
>>> through colonialism.
>>
>> https://www.insideedition.com/texas-high-school-graduation-postponed-
>> after-only-5-seniors-qualify-for-diploma-81663
>>
>> Please explain how eastern Asia benefited from the wisdom of a bunch of
>> dead Greeks? Or India. You are aware that India influenced Greek
>> philosophy, not vice versa.
> 
> I don't see how that could have happened.  That was even before MySpace, 
> let alone Facebook.
Oh c'mon. Take that tongue of of that cheek.
There was considerable cultural intermingling in the late bronze age and 
early iron age. The druids are said to have taught the Greek philopshers.
But the Greeks *wrote it down*

Bronze age people were intelligent and sophisticated and thought deeply 
on many issues, once they had a culture that gave them the time.

This partisan nonsense about 'it all started here' or 'we invented that' 
is simply nonsense. Good ideas spread eventually because they are useful 
ideas.
Science may be decried as 'white and male' but it fucking works, dude...

-- 
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will 
eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such 
time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic 
and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally 
important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for 
the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the 
truth is the greatest enemy of the State.

Joseph Goebbels



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#697111

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-05-31 03:27 +1000
Message-ID<op.15rpguhbbyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#697046
On Tue, 30 May 2023 19:54:26 +1000, The Natural Philosopher  
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On 29/05/2023 22:34, Ed P wrote:
>> On 5/29/2023 3:56 PM, rbowman wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:50:35 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> The modern state of affairs is that most of the world has electricity,
>>>> literacy, science, food, medicine, travel, womens and minority rights,
>>>> and choices in life. All that descended from the Greeks and  
>>>> disseminated
>>>> through colonialism.
>>>
>>> https://www.insideedition.com/texas-high-school-graduation-postponed-
>>> after-only-5-seniors-qualify-for-diploma-81663
>>>
>>> Please explain how eastern Asia benefited from the wisdom of a bunch of
>>> dead Greeks? Or India. You are aware that India influenced Greek
>>> philosophy, not vice versa.
>>  I don't see how that could have happened.  That was even before  
>> MySpace, let alone Facebook.

> Oh c'mon. Take that tongue of of that cheek.
> There was considerable cultural intermingling in the late bronze age and  
> early iron age.

> The druids are said to have taught the Greek philopshers.

Just because someone said something...

> But the Greeks *wrote it down*

> Bronze age people were intelligent and sophisticated and thought deeply  
> on many issues, once they had a culture that gave them the time.

> This partisan nonsense about 'it all started here' or 'we invented that'  
> is simply nonsense. Good ideas spread eventually because they are useful  
> ideas.
> Science may be decried as 'white and male' but it fucking works, dude...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 9 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 34  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design


csiph-web