Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #696575 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-05-27 02:52 +0100 |
| Last post | 2023-07-25 10:08 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 673 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 11:52 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:02 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:07 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 04:18 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:34 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:10 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:39 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:38 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-27 19:10 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:28 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:30 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:20 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-05-27 21:23 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 20:28 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:10 +1000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:50 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:42 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:42 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 03:59 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:32 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 11:55 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:00 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:36 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:20 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:40 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:04 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-25 13:40 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 17:41 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:29 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:57 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-08-11 20:56 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-08-11 22:51 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:42 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:32 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-28 17:17 -0400
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:33 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:51 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:41 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:02 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:25 -0700
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 19:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-27 08:33 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:32 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:34 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 06:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:43 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:03 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-28 21:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:09 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:15 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:34 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:27 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:11 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:48 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:47 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:01 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 21:45 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling and Trolling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:18 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:58 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 03:59 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 +1000
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:37 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:34 +1000
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:05 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:42 +0100
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:04 +0200
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:57 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:39 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:42 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:08 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:07 +0200
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:00 +0200
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:45 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:44 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:04 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:11 +1000
Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 04:11 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:19 +0200
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:42 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:19 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:46 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:25 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:44 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:16 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:06 +1000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 +1000
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:57 +0200
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:56 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:39 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 22:05 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:20 +0200
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:52 +0200
Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:51 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 07:11 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:17 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:55 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:04 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:12 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:23 +1000
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:11 +0200
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:10 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:03 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:15 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 07:39 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:20 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:13 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:16 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:58 +0200
Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads having at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:49 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 15:59 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:38 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:39 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:59 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:41 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:36 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:45 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:54 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:09 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:13 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 15:30 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:33 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:40 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:46 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:07 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:07 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:27 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:05 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:36 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:39 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:06 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:37 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:09 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:42 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 08:02 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:01 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-31 02:00 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:39 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:08 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:48 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:41 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:11 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:53 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-01 21:11 -0700
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:16 +0200
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-29 14:57 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 16:38 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:10 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:50 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:11 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:43 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:52 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:19 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:50 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:13 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:22 +0200
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:56 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:37 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 17:34 -0400
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:30 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:10 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:54 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 03:27 +1000
Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 03:27 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:25 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:11 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:38 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:13 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:26 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:44 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:03 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:37 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:04 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:27 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:33 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:21 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 10:15 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 12:48 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:10 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:24 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:21 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:46 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:23 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:39 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:43 +0100
Re: The NATURAL IDIOT Alert, again! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:13 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:33 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:02 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:01 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:15 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Pamela <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 11:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 03:51 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-03 05:47 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 14:14 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:19 +0100
Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-04 00:02 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:24 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-04 05:30 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:18 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 15:03 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 15:10 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:56 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> - 2023-06-03 16:54 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 17:57 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:20 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:15 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:22 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:44 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:49 +1000
Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 01:49 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:01 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:37 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:02 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:30 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:10 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:03 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:18 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 03:05 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:27 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:23 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:49 +0100
Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 11:30 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:19 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:18 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:34 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 16:00 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-27 12:35 -0400
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 18:39 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:42 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:01 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:11 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:33 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:04 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:03 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:32 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:48 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 20:07 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:38 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 04:50 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-22 23:59 -0400
Re: Troll-feeding Senile ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:21 +0200
Re: v for frequency? jon <jon@nospam.cn> - 2023-07-23 14:41 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 17:22 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:56 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:33 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 23:25 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-24 05:52 +0100
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 09:55 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 11:03 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:12 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:30 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:06 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-25 08:40 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:04 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:11 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 21:34 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 17:35 -0400
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:45 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 09:47 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 19:08 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 23:25 -0400
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:24 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:52 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:13 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:50 +0000
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:13 +0000
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:25 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Jim Joyce <none@none.invalid> - 2023-07-26 12:43 -0500
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-07-26 20:15 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-26 12:14 -0700
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:26 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2023-07-31 11:55 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-26 14:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 19:55 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:05 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:52 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:00 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:23 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 11:03 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:44 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 16:57 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:12 +0000
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 18:51 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-27 04:58 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-27 10:47 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:10 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:02 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 08:35 +0000
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 14:50 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 15:17 +0000
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 16:26 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:26 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:07 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:43 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:13 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:15 +0100
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:14 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:13 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:23 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:29 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-23 08:19 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 08:52 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:27 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:58 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:15 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:35 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:56 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:28 -0700
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:10 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-27 04:40 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 13:33 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:09 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:22 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:29 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:14 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:48 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:12 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:26 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 16:30 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:52 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:49 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:31 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:33 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:50 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:18 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:23 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:36 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:07 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:23 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:26 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 06:45 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:56 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:45 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:33 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:24 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:56 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:22 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 09:00 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Bev <none@forme.com> - 2023-05-29 16:42 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:47 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:28 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:03 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:22 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:21 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 19:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:22 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 21:38 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:46 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 18:24 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:10 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 19:13 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 19:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:52 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:30 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-06-15 01:32 +0200
Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-15 16:30 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:00 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:25 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:16 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:40 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:02 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 23:00 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 +1000
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:46 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 10:27 +1000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:55 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:36 +1000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 22:14 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +1000
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 00:37 -0700
Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 02:23 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 19:55 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 12:01 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 13:14 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 14:32 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:25 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:36 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:41 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:20 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:24 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 13:03 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:17 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:26 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:35 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:44 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:24 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:43 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:42 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 18:13 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:19 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 18:04 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:30 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 15:53 +0100
Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 16:05 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:12 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:33 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:14 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:22 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:44 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:51 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:38 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:45 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 13:49 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 +1000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 15:47 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:19 +1000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 18:10 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:11 +1000
Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:24 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:32 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 01:46 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 14:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:27 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 20:08 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 14:14 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 06:58 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:14 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:31 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:23 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 20:41 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-06-01 20:19 -0400
Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 18:01 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:20 +0100
Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-02 13:09 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-06-01 14:16 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 08:43 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:13 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 17:42 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 11:10 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:35 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 14:22 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 15:13 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 16:04 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:36 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:44 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:42 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:56 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:25 +0200
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:45 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 20:00 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:29 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:40 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:08 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:21 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-02 07:23 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 22:51 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-30 08:07 -0700
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 18:17 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:58 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:32 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:39 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:32 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 15:17 -0400
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:34 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 11:13 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:26 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:05 +0000
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:01 +0200
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:58 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:00 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:04 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:50 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:01 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:59 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:05 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:20 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:27 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:44 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:47 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 22:20 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:10 -0700
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:14 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-28 14:19 -0400
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 21:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 13:33 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:46 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:03 -0700
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:18 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:41 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:03 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 05:41 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:25 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:44 +0000
Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-07-29 19:45 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:56 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-30 00:35 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 10:15 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:12 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 00:43 -0700
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 17:24 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 14:14 -0400
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:27 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:48 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:05 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 17:27 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:38 +0100
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 18:53 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 21:02 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:42 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:28 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:39 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:29 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:30 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:32 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:10 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:46 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:10 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:14 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:40 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:33 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:15 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:52 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 21:59 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:46 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:46 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:58 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:19 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:54 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-31 23:25 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 08:00 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:44 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 08:08 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 20:00 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 16:58 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:35 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 19:15 -0400
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 03:28 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 14:35 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:26 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 15:00 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:13 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:10 +0100
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 09:05 -0700
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 16:19 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 10:14 -0700
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 17:49 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-06-01 03:17 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:51 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:11 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 01:52 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:23 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:05 -0700
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:11 +0200
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-28 15:50 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:19 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:40 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 06:05 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:59 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:03 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:28 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 20:15 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:59 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:05 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:38 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:55 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 06:57 -0700
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:12 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:38 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-28 21:05 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:50 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:15 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:43 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:35 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:07 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:12 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-28 23:53 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:17 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:57 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:32 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:39 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:02 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 06:19 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:52 +0100
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:37 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:02 +1000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:34 -0700
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:46 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:51 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:31 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:53 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:45 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:48 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:07 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 12:27 -0400
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 10:05 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:59 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:58 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:50 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0100
Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 11:24 +0100
Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-28 11:00 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 12:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 12:59 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:34 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0100
Re: v for frequency? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-29 21:44 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:09 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:15 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:09 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:30 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-24 15:49 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 17:39 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:10 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:31 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:07 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-25 07:02 -0700
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:08 +0200
Page 5 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 34 Next page →
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-30 10:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! |
| Message-ID | <H2idM.6583945$MJk2.5721936@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #696976 |
On Tue, 30 May 2023 08:58:45 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread> -- Sqwertz to Rodent Speed: "This is just a hunch, but I'm betting you're kinda an argumentative asshole. MID: <ev1p6ml7ywd5$.dlg@sqwertz.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 09:45 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! |
| Message-ID | <u51l6v$3ta21$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #696808 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 13:34:16 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread> -- Richard addressing senile Rodent Speed: "Shit you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll." MID: <ogoa38$pul$1@news.mixmin.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 09:44 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip |
| Message-ID | <5KYcM.6536119$MJk2.5160427@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #696802 |
On 29 May 2023 02:15:09 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling, troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again: > Western Europe doesn't have the wherewithal to have a good, old fashioned > war. That may be why they're so fascinated with a proxy war in eastern > Europe. Britain still thinks it's in a position to affect the balance of > power on the continent. This coming from the abnormal perverted senile bigmouth who admitted he had never been in the Army! LMAO!!! -- And yet another "cool" line from the resident bigmouthed all-American superhero: "I was working on the roof when the cat came up the ladder to see what I was doing. Cats do not do well going down aluminum ladders." MID: <k9roshF2rjdU1@mid.individual.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 12:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <u520ru$1cm4u$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #696802 |
On 29/05/2023 03:15, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:09:55 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > >> On Mon, 29 May 2023 03:03:38 +1000, John Larkin >> <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:43:29 +0100, The Natural Philosopher >>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 27/05/2023 22:24, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>> On 2023-05-27, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> We never had food rationing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >>>>>> flavours? >>>>> >>>>> Your point that our rationing wasn't as bad as your rationing is >>>>> taken. However, the U.S. had rationing. >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ > Rationing_in_the_United_States#World_War_II >>>>> >>>>> Of course our food rationing wasn't as bad as yours, because we had a >>>>> lot more acreage under cultivation. And nobody was bombing it. >>>>> >>>>> "At the start of the Second World War in 1939, the United Kingdom was >>>>> importing 20 million long tons of food per year, including about 70% >>>>> of its cheese and sugar, almost 80% of fruit and about 70% of cereals >>>>> and fats. The UK also imported more than half of its meat and relied >>>>> on imported feed to support its domestic meat production." >>>>> >>>>> You guys were in real trouble, no doubt about it. >>>>> >>>> While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked >>>> you in the balls. >> >>> The US population was wary of millenia of non-stop european wars. >> >> Yes. >> >>> As continue today. >> >> Not in western europe they don't. > > Western Europe doesn't have the wherewithal to have a good, old fashioned > war. That may be why they're so fascinated with a proxy war in eastern > Europe. Britain still thinks it's in a position to affect the balance of > power on the continent. > > And it is in fact completely correct in that assumption. It does. The Storm Shadows it has supplied are having a huge impact of Russian logistics. And now Britain has supplied them, France doesnt want to feel left out and will be supplying French made ones, which they call SCALPS. It was the UKs decision to send a token dozen main battle tanks with no nuclear retaliation by Moscow, that emboldened the USA and Germany to send Aramms and leopard tanks, respectively. It is on UK soil that the USAF has all its F15s and F35s, its Rivet joint surveillance aircraft and its stratotankers, that are all buzzing round over my head as a deterrent and in support of intelligence gathering along Ukraine's borders. Just because Biden hates the UK, doesn't mean that a lot of US military personnel are not stationed here interoperating seamlessly with UK military personnel, and cooperating on joint manoeuvres that see e.g. B52s patrolling the Baltic escorted by Eurofighters. We are effectively at war here. In alliance with all our NATO partners. Including the USA. And we all make a difference. -- "A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight and understanding". Marshall McLuhan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-30 04:11 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.15pwsvf7byq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #696842 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 21:04:30 +1000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 29/05/2023 03:15, rbowman wrote: >> On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:09:55 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 03:03:38 +1000, John Larkin >>> <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:43:29 +0100, The Natural Philosopher >>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 27/05/2023 22:24, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-05-27, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We never had food rationing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >>>>>>> flavours? >>>>>> >>>>>> Your point that our rationing wasn't as bad as your rationing is >>>>>> taken. However, the U.S. had rationing. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ >> Rationing_in_the_United_States#World_War_II >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course our food rationing wasn't as bad as yours, because we had >>>>>> a >>>>>> lot more acreage under cultivation. And nobody was bombing it. >>>>>> >>>>>> "At the start of the Second World War in 1939, the United Kingdom >>>>>> was >>>>>> importing 20 million long tons of food per year, including about 70% >>>>>> of its cheese and sugar, almost 80% of fruit and about 70% of >>>>>> cereals >>>>>> and fats. The UK also imported more than half of its meat and relied >>>>>> on imported feed to support its domestic meat production." >>>>>> >>>>>> You guys were in real trouble, no doubt about it. >>>>>> >>>>> While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked >>>>> you in the balls. >>> >>>> The US population was wary of millenia of non-stop european wars. >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>>> As continue today. >>> >>> Not in western europe they don't. >> Western Europe doesn't have the wherewithal to have a good, old >> fashioned >> war. That may be why they're so fascinated with a proxy war in eastern >> Europe. Britain still thinks it's in a position to affect the balance of >> power on the continent. >> > And it is in fact completely correct in that assumption. It does. > The Storm Shadows it has supplied are having a huge impact of Russian > logistics. > And now Britain has supplied them, France doesnt want to feel left out > and will be supplying French made ones, which they call SCALPS. > It was the UKs decision to send a token dozen main battle tanks with no > nuclear retaliation by Moscow, that emboldened the USA and Germany to > send Aramms and leopard tanks, respectively. BULLSHIT. > It is on UK soil that the USAF has all its F15s and F35s, its Rivet > joint surveillance aircraft and its stratotankers, that are all buzzing > round over my head as a deterrent and in support of intelligence > gathering along Ukraine's borders. > Just because Biden hates the UK, doesn't mean that a lot of US military > personnel are not stationed here interoperating seamlessly with UK > military personnel, and cooperating on joint manoeuvres that see e.g. > B52s patrolling the Baltic escorted by Eurofighters. > We are effectively at war here. In alliance with all our NATO partners. > Including the USA. > And we all make a difference.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 21:19 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 04:11 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL |
| Message-ID | <u52tsq$5mu7$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #696895 |
On Tue, 30 May 2023 04:11:09 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread> -- Tim+ about trolling Rodent Speed: He is by far the most persistent troll who seems to be able to get under the skin of folk who really should know better. Since when did arguing with a troll ever achieve anything (beyond giving the troll pleasure)? MID: <1421057667.659518815.743467.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 09:42 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! |
| Message-ID | <pHYcM.6590958$miq3.1764209@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #696797 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:09:55 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread> -- Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 89-year-old senile Australian cretin's pathological trolling: https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/rod-speed-faq.2973853/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 21:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kdhuqrFk811U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #696738 |
On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:43:29 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked you > in the balls. Roosevelt's idea of 'neutrality' was as lopsided as Wilson's. It would have been better to sit back and let WWI take its course. Japan was a good example of a possible outcome when sanctions and embargoes are used against a rising nation that feels it has a better founded interest in East Asia than a country an ocean away. It all started with Perry's Black Ships. The ruling oligarchs in the US are slow learners. The latest furor over China's banning of Micron chips is an amazing example of hypocrisy. Japan realized they could not win a sustained war when they attacked. I don't believe China has that problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 23:31 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip |
| Message-ID | <JKPcM.2930691$l5R6.1510597@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #696790 |
On 28 May 2023 21:19:23 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling, troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again: > Roosevelt's idea of 'neutrality' was as lopsided as Wilson's. It would > have been better to sit back and let WWI take its course. > > Japan was a good example of a possible outcome when sanctions and > embargoes are used against a rising nation that feels it has a better > founded interest in East Asia than a country an ocean away. > > It all started with Perry's Black Ships. The ruling oligarchs in the US > are slow learners. The latest furor over China's banning of Micron chips > is an amazing example of hypocrisy. Japan realized they could not win a > sustained war when they attacked. I don't believe China has that problem. Yes, pathological senile asshole, bigmouth and Trumptard ...and Nazi Germany also ONLY wanted "to build a road to East Prussia", right? LMAO -- Trump-, Hitler- and Putin-sympathizer lowbrowwoman about Nazi-Germany's good intentions: "At the onset all Germany wanted was to build a road to East Prussia which had been severed from Germany proper by the Danzig Corridor." MID: <kabnetFft5qU17@mid.individual.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 08:46 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.15oevwd6byq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #696790 |
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote > The Natural Philosopher wrote >> While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked you >> in the balls. > Roosevelt's idea of 'neutrality' was as lopsided as Wilson's. It would > have been better to sit back and let WWI take its course. Better for who ? > Japan was a good example of a possible outcome when sanctions and > embargoes are used against a rising nation that feels it has a better > founded interest in East Asia than a country an ocean away. Bit hard on the chinese tho. > It all started with Perry's Black Ships. The ruling oligarchs in the US No such animal. > are slow learners. The latest furor over China's banning of Micron chips > is an amazing example of hypocrisy. Japan realized they could not win a > sustained war when they attacked. I don't believe China has that problem. Corse it does with oil and iron ore alone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 02:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kdigplFmavpU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #696799 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:46:34 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote >> The Natural Philosopher wrote > >>> While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked >>> you in the balls. > >> Roosevelt's idea of 'neutrality' was as lopsided as Wilson's. It would >> have been better to sit back and let WWI take its course. > > Better for who ? Ultimately the world, I believe. A more equitable treaty might have headed off WWII. Britain wanted to make sure Germany never challenged their military or economic hegemony and France was still butt hurt about 1871. Wilson, with all his idealism, was as addled as Biden. >> Japan was a good example of a possible outcome when sanctions and >> embargoes are used against a rising nation that feels it has a better >> founded interest in East Asia than a country an ocean away. > > Bit hard on the chinese tho. So it goes. Japan, China, and Korea have as much right to fratricidal wars as Europe. >> It all started with Perry's Black Ships. The ruling oligarchs in the US > > No such animal. Well, whatever you want to call a political system that's sold to the highest bidder. That "government of the people, by the people, for the people" was nice rhetoric but was bullshit even as it left Lincoln's mouth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 13:44 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.15osn9fxbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #696803 |
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote >>> The Natural Philosopher wrote >>>> While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked >>>> you in the balls. >>> Roosevelt's idea of 'neutrality' was as lopsided as Wilson's. It would >>> have been better to sit back and let WWI take its course. >> Better for who ? > Ultimately the world, I believe. More fool you. The 30 years war didnt go well for France. > A more equitable treaty might have headed > off WWII. Fantasy. Hitler didnt start that one because of any inequity. > Britain wanted to make sure Germany never challenged their > military or economic hegemony Nope, that WW1 wouldnt happen again, unlike all the previous wars in western europe which saw those fools ripping each other thoats out in almost ever single generation. Germany never amounted to much militarily or economically before WW1 > and France was still butt hurt about 1871. For a damned good reason. > Wilson, with all his idealism, was as addled as Biden. He didnt determine what happened after WW1 had ended. >>> Japan was a good example of a possible outcome when sanctions and >>> embargoes are used against a rising nation that feels it has a better >>> founded interest in East Asia than a country an ocean away. >> Bit hard on the chinese tho. > So it goes. Only for isolationists. > Japan, China, and Korea have as much right to fratricidal wars > as Europe. The sanctions and embargos werent due to it being a fraticidal war. >>> It all started with Perry's Black Ships. The ruling oligarchs in the US >> No such animal. > Well, whatever you want to call a political system that's sold to the > highest bidder. That's bullshit too. Thats not what got FDR elected in the first place. > That "government of the people, by the people, for the > people" was nice rhetoric but was bullshit even as it left Lincoln's > mouth. Irrelevant to your stupid line about ruling oligarchs in the US.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 06:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kdiu9fFomutU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #696809 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 13:44:23 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > Germany never amounted to much militarily or economically before WW1 https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany/The-economy-1890-1914 Are you blissful in your ignorance?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 17:06 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.15o11qe0byq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #696814 |
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> Germany never amounted to much militarily or economically before WW1 > https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany/The-economy-1890-1914 Doesnt refute what I said as far as the navy and military were concerned.let alone them being even remotely a threat to the UK world wide militarily or economically. > Are you blissful in your ignorance? You are the one with that problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 17:33 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.15o3arn6byq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #696818 |
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote > rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote >> Rod Speed wrote >>> Germany never amounted to much militarily or economically before WW1 >> https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany/The-economy-1890-1914 > > Doesnt refute what I said as far as the navy and military > were concerned.let alone them being even remotely a > threat to the UK world wide militarily or economically. And while they had overtaken the UK in the last few years in some areas of industrial production, they had fuck all effect on the UK and USA dominance in world trade. >> Are you blissful in your ignorance? > > You are the one with that problem.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 09:57 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! |
| Message-ID | <u51lts$3tdu5$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #696818 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 17:06:52 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: <FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread> -- FredXX to Rodent Speed: "You are still an idiot and an embarrassment to your country. No wonder we shipped the likes of you out of the British Isles. Perhaps stupidity and criminality is inherited after all?" Message-ID: <plbf76$gfl$1@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 09:56 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! |
| Message-ID | <sVYcM.5045733$US27.3128662@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #696814 |
On 29 May 2023 06:16:16 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling, troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again: > https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany/The-economy-1890-1914 > > Are you blissful in your ignorance? What is obvious is that you are blissful hearing yourself talking, while HE is blissful when he's auto-contradicting. IOW, this here is about TWO blissfully senile ASSHOLES and TROLLS are having a tete-a-tete! LOL -- Yet more of the abnormal senile gossiping by the resident senile gossip: "I never understood how they made a living but the space where the local party store was is now up for lease. It probably was more than helium. I often walk over the the adjacent market to get something for dinner and people stuffing balloons in their cars was a common sight. No more. I've no idea if there is another store in town." MID: <kafs2nF6vi1U15@mid.individual.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 10:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <u51rro$1bd88$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #696814 |
On 29/05/2023 07:16, rbowman wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2023 13:44:23 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > >> Germany never amounted to much militarily or economically before WW1 > > https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany/The-economy-1890-1914 > > Are you blissful in your ignorance? He is. Utterly blissful. I seem to recall it was parts of what became Germany that united with Britain to crush Napoleon at Waterloo. Of course Germany didn't exist as a nation till somewhat later, being comprised of several kingdoms then -- Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich people by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason they are poor. Peter Thompson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 22:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kdkltaF1jptU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #696838 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 10:39:04 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Of course Germany didn't exist as a nation till somewhat later, being > comprised of several kingdoms then Historians are divided on whether Bismarck trolled the French into declaring war to promote German unity or if he only made use of the windfall. It was quite a coup since the predominantly Catholic southern Germans don't particularly like the Protestant northerners. Bismarck was astute enough to roll back his Kulturkampf to hold it all together. It also helped with the alliance with Austria. Whatever, that wrote paid to the Second Empire. Britain sat that one out since it had the traditional suspicion of France. Napoleon had managed to piss off Russia and the US, so no help there. Hubris is a common condition for nations but France seems especially endowed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-30 00:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip |
| Message-ID | <qz9dM.3002753$l5R6.2960728@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #696969 |
On 29 May 2023 22:05:30 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling, troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again: > Historians are divided on whether Bismarck trolled the French into > declaring war to promote German NOBODY is divided on whether you are a pathological bigmouth or not, you abnormal senile bigmouth! -- More of the resident senile bigmouth's idiotic "cool" blather: "For reasons I can't recall I painted a spare bedroom in purple. It may have had something to do with copious quantities of cheap Scotch." MID: <k89lchF8b4pU1@mid.individual.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 34 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design
csiph-web