Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #696575 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-05-27 02:52 +0100 |
| Last post | 2023-07-25 10:08 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 673 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-05-27 02:52 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 11:52 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:02 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:07 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 04:18 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 12:34 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:10 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:39 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:38 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-27 19:10 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:28 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:30 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:20 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-05-27 21:23 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 20:28 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:10 +1000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:50 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:42 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:42 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 03:59 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:32 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 11:55 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:00 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:36 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:20 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:40 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:04 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-25 13:40 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 17:41 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:29 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-11 14:57 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-08-11 20:56 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-08-11 22:51 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:42 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:32 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-28 17:17 -0400
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:33 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:51 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:41 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:02 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 09:25 -0700
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 19:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-27 08:33 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 19:32 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 22:34 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 06:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:43 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-28 10:03 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-28 21:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:09 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:15 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:34 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:27 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:11 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:48 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:47 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:01 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 21:45 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling and Trolling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:18 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:58 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 03:59 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 +1000
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:37 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:34 +1000
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:05 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:42 +0100
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:04 +0200
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:01 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:57 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:39 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 10:42 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:08 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:07 +0200
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:00 +0200
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:45 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:44 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:04 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:11 +1000
Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 04:11 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:19 +0200
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:42 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:19 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:46 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:25 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 13:44 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 06:16 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:06 +1000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 +1000
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:57 +0200
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:56 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:39 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 22:05 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 00:20 +0200
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:52 +0200
Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:51 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 07:11 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:17 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:55 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:04 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:12 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:23 +1000
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:11 +0200
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads and Bigmouths at Loggerheads, again! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:10 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:03 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:15 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 07:39 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:20 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:13 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:16 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:58 +0200
Re: TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads having at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:49 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 15:59 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 13:38 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:39 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:59 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:41 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:36 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:45 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:54 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:09 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:13 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 15:30 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:33 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:40 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:46 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:07 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:07 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:27 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:05 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:36 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:39 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:06 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:37 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:09 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:42 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 08:02 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:01 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-31 02:00 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:39 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:08 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:48 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:41 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:11 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:53 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-01 21:11 -0700
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:16 +0200
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-29 14:57 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 16:38 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:10 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:21 +0200
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:59 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:50 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:11 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:43 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:52 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:19 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 08:50 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:13 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:22 +0200
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:56 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:37 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 17:34 -0400
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:30 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:10 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:54 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 03:27 +1000
Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 03:27 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:33 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:25 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:11 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:38 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:13 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 22:26 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:44 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:03 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:37 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:19 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:04 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:27 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:33 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:21 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 10:15 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Slevin <slevin@192.168.1.1> - 2023-05-31 12:48 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:10 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 11:24 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:21 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:46 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:23 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:39 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:43 +0100
Re: The NATURAL IDIOT Alert, again! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:13 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:33 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 09:02 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 04:01 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:15 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Pamela <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> - 2023-06-03 11:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 03:51 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-03 05:47 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 14:14 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:19 +0100
Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-04 00:02 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:24 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-04 05:30 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 14:18 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 15:03 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 15:10 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:56 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> - 2023-06-03 16:54 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-06-03 17:57 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:20 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 10:15 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-04 08:22 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-03 08:44 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:49 +1000
Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 01:49 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING, already!!!! LOL Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:01 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-04 01:37 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-03 19:02 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:30 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 21:10 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:03 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:18 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 03:05 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 23:27 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:23 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:49 +0100
Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 11:30 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 19:19 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:18 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:34 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-27 16:00 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-27 12:35 -0400
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 18:39 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:42 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:01 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:11 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:33 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:04 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 21:03 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 23:32 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 11:48 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 20:07 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:38 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 04:50 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-22 23:59 -0400
Re: Troll-feeding Senile ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:21 +0200
Re: v for frequency? jon <jon@nospam.cn> - 2023-07-23 14:41 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 17:22 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:56 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:33 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-23 23:25 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-24 05:52 +0100
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 09:55 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 11:03 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:12 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:30 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:06 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-25 08:40 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:04 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:11 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 21:34 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 17:35 -0400
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:45 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 09:47 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-25 19:08 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-25 23:25 -0400
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:24 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:52 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:13 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:50 +0000
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:13 +0000
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 15:25 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Jim Joyce <none@none.invalid> - 2023-07-26 12:43 -0500
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-07-26 20:15 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-26 12:14 -0700
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 18:26 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2023-07-31 11:55 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-26 14:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 19:55 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:05 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:52 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:00 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 08:23 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 11:03 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 14:44 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 16:57 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-26 18:12 +0000
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-26 18:51 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-27 04:58 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-27 10:47 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:10 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:02 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 08:35 +0000
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 14:50 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 15:17 +0000
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-25 16:26 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:26 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-25 21:07 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-26 00:43 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 10:13 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:15 +0100
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:14 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-08-28 04:13 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 20:23 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 23:29 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-07-23 08:19 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 08:52 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:29 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 10:27 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:58 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:15 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:35 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:56 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:28 -0700
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 02:10 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-27 04:40 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 13:33 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:09 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:22 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:29 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:14 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:48 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:12 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:26 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 16:30 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 02:52 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 19:49 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-28 21:31 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:33 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 12:50 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:18 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:23 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:36 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:07 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:23 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:26 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 06:45 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-29 13:56 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 20:45 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:33 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:24 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 14:56 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 07:22 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 15:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 09:00 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Bev <none@forme.com> - 2023-05-29 16:42 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:47 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:28 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:03 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:22 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:21 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:00 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 19:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:22 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-29 21:38 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:46 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 18:24 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 05:10 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 19:13 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 19:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:52 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:30 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-06-15 01:32 +0200
Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-15 16:30 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:00 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:25 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:16 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 05:40 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 22:02 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-29 23:00 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 09:00 +1000
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 00:46 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 10:27 +1000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 17:55 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 14:36 +1000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 22:14 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +1000
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 00:37 -0700
Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 02:23 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 19:55 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 12:01 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 13:14 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 14:32 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:25 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 15:50 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:36 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:41 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:20 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:24 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 13:03 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:17 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:26 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:35 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:44 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:24 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:43 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:42 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 18:13 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:19 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Fredxx <fredxx@spam.uk> - 2023-05-30 18:04 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 12:30 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 12:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-05-30 15:53 +0100
Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-05-30 16:05 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:12 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-30 16:33 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 17:14 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:22 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:44 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:51 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 05:38 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:45 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 13:49 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 +1000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 15:47 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 09:19 +1000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 18:10 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:11 +1000
Re: "Who or What is Rod Speed?" Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:24 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 08:32 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-31 01:46 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 14:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:27 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-31 20:08 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 14:14 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 06:58 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:14 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:31 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:23 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 20:41 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-06-01 20:19 -0400
Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 18:01 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-02 10:20 +0100
Re: v for frequency? SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> - 2023-06-02 13:09 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-06-01 14:16 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 08:43 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:16 +0100
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 17:13 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2023-06-01 17:42 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-06-01 11:10 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-06-01 11:35 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 14:22 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:40 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2023-05-30 15:13 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 16:04 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:36 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 20:44 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 14:42 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 07:56 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:25 +0200
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:19 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:45 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 20:00 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-29 12:29 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 08:40 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 05:08 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 10:21 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-06-02 07:23 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:40 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 22:51 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-30 08:07 -0700
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 18:17 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-30 04:58 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:32 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 12:39 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 18:32 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-29 15:17 -0400
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 21:34 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 11:13 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-29 08:26 +1000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:05 +0000
Re: The TWO Trolling Senile Shitheads at Loggerheads! LMAO! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:01 +0200
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 09:58 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 04:00 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:04 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 07:50 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 16:01 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 09:59 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:05 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:20 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:27 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:44 -0700
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 17:47 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 22:20 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:10 -0700
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:14 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:14 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> - 2023-07-28 14:19 -0400
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 21:20 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 13:33 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:46 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:03 -0700
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:18 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:41 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:03 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 05:41 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:25 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:44 +0000
Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-07-29 19:45 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:56 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-30 00:35 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 10:15 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:12 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 00:43 -0700
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 17:24 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:53 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 14:14 -0400
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:27 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 15:48 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-30 10:05 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 17:27 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 18:38 +0100
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-30 18:53 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-30 21:02 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:42 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:28 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:39 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:29 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:30 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 11:33 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:32 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:10 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 14:46 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:10 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 21:14 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:40 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 19:33 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:15 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-29 14:52 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-05-30 21:59 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 07:38 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 04:46 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-30 21:46 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 07:58 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 06:19 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 22:54 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2023-05-31 23:25 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 08:00 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:44 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 08:08 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-06-01 20:00 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 16:58 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-30 22:35 +0000
Re: v for frequency? Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> - 2023-05-30 19:15 -0400
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 03:28 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 14:35 +1000
Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-31 08:26 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-31 15:00 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 19:13 +0200
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:33 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:10 +0100
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-31 10:31 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 09:05 -0700
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 16:19 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-31 10:14 -0700
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-05-31 17:49 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-06-01 03:17 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-06-01 09:51 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-29 09:11 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-29 01:52 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 14:23 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 07:05 -0700
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:11 +0200
Re: v for frequency? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-07-28 15:50 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:19 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:40 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 06:05 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:59 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:03 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 00:28 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-28 20:15 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-29 02:59 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-29 10:05 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-29 12:38 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:55 +0100
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 06:57 -0700
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 17:08 +0200
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 18:12 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 20:38 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-28 21:05 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-28 22:50 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 10:15 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-07-29 08:43 +0000
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-29 18:35 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 22:07 +0200
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-07-28 17:12 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-28 23:53 -0700
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 08:17 -0700
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 15:57 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 09:32 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:39 +0000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:02 -0700
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-28 06:19 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:45 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:52 +0100
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:37 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 10:02 +1000
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 21:34 -0700
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:46 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-05-27 20:51 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> - 2023-05-27 21:31 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-28 05:53 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:45 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:48 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:36 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 16:07 +0200
Re: v for frequency? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-05-27 12:27 -0400
Re: v for frequency? John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> - 2023-05-27 10:05 -0700
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:59 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 22:58 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:50 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0100
Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 11:24 +0100
Re: v for frequency? charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2023-05-28 11:00 +0000
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 12:28 +0100
Re: v for frequency? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2023-05-28 12:59 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000
Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-27 23:34 +0200
Re: v for frequency? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:33 +0100
Re: v for frequency? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-29 21:44 +0100
Re: v for frequency? "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 09:09 +1000
Re: Lonely Sleepless Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-05-28 09:51 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 01:58 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-23 11:15 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 17:09 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-23 23:30 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> - 2023-07-24 15:49 +0100
Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 17:39 +0200
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 04:10 +0100
Re: v for frequency? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2023-07-25 03:31 +0000
Re: v for frequency? "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> - 2023-07-25 07:07 +0100
Re: v for frequency? Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2023-07-25 07:02 -0700
Re: lowbrowwoman, Birdbrain's Eternal Senile Whore! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2023-07-25 10:08 +0200
Page 3 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 34 Next page →
| From | Ed P <esp@snet.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 17:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <vxPcM.2213728$gGD7.1993031@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #696784 |
On 5/28/2023 3:42 PM, rbowman wrote: >> >> Back then, there were three ice cream flavors. > > If you were really unfortunate they were married together in > 'Neapolitan'. I didn't like strawberry and considered vanilla a waste of > time so that was not a favorite. > Haagen Dazs Vanilla Bean is about the only vanilla worth buying. The original Breyer's from 50 years ago was too, but it has been cheapened to crap.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 21:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <LMPcM.3547666$9sn9.3444035@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #696784 |
On 2023-05-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Sun, 28 May 2023 10:00:13 -0700, John Larkin wrote: > >> On Sun, 28 May 2023 11:55:19 +0100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> >> wrote: >> >>>On 27/05/2023 21:42, John Larkin wrote: >>>> On Sat, 27 May 2023 20:42:57 +0100, Max Demian >>>> <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>>> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> We never had food rationing. >>>>>> >>>>>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >>>>> >>>>> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >>>>> flavours? >>>> >>>> Dark days. >>> >>>That used to be a dig at the lack of onerous rationing in the US in WW2. >> >> Back then, there were three ice cream flavors. > > If you were really unfortunate they were married together in > 'Neapolitan'. I didn't like strawberry and considered vanilla a waste of > time so that was not a favorite. I like strawberry ice cream, but it has to be _good_ strawberry ice cream. With chunks of strawberry. The pink stuff in Neapolitan was always artificially flavored. -- Cindy Hamilton
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 02:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kdii8uFn22fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #696794 |
On Sun, 28 May 2023 21:33:31 GMT, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > I like strawberry ice cream, but it has to be _good_ strawberry ice > cream. With chunks of strawberry. The pink stuff in Neapolitan was > always artificially flavored. My cousin worked for Sealtest before they were sucked in by KraftCo. Their marketing coup was checkerboard ice cream https://ru.pinterest.com/pin/400961173073266727/ I don't remember the later variants. I believe the original was vanilla and chocolate, the two cheapest flavors to produce. He never would tell me how they did it. He also ruined my enjoyment of Fudgecicles. Take the out of date ice cream returned by the stores, strain out any fruit or nut component, add enough cocoa to cover up any original flavor, and voila! a Fudgecicle. Upstate NY was dairy country so there were many alternatives to ice cream in cardboard cartons. I don't know if it was a copycat or independent action but one of the dairy bars had a 'pig's dinner' with the button to prove it. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/340584790564295362/ Then there was Stewart's https://www.stewartsshops.com/news/youre-in-control-make-your-own/ It was strictly ice cream in my day but you can imagine the results of turning a kid loose on a counter full of vomit inducing syrups.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 09:41 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip |
| Message-ID | <VGYcM.5681566$14z3.756870@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #696804 |
On 29 May 2023 02:51:11 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling, troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again: > My cousin Fuck your cousin, you abnormal senile bigmouth and gossip! -- More of the resident senile gossip's absolutely idiotic endless blather about herself: "My family and I traveled cross country in '52, going out on the northern route and returning mostly on Rt 66. We also traveled quite a bit as the interstates were being built. It might have been slower but it was a lot more interesting. Even now I prefer what William Least Heat-Moon called the blue highways but it's difficult. Around here there are remnants of the Mullan Road as frontage roads but I-90 was laid over most of it so there is no continuous route. So far 93 hasn't been destroyed." MID: <kae9ivF7suU1@mid.individual.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 07:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.18mi2njtmvhs6z@ryzen> |
| In reply to | #696771 |
On Sun, 28 May 2023 18:00:13 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote: > On Sun, 28 May 2023 11:55:19 +0100, Max Demian > <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >> On 27/05/2023 21:42, John Larkin wrote: >>> On Sat, 27 May 2023 20:42:57 +0100, Max Demian >>> <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> We never had food rationing. >>>>> >>>>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >>>> >>>> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >>>> flavours? >>> >>> Dark days. >> >> That used to be a dig at the lack of onerous rationing in the US in WW2. > > Back then, there were three ice cream flavors. I've only ever had chocolate, vanilla (which I always thought meant plain, but I think that's "manilla"), and strawberry. My sister ate mint which I detested. >>> I was at Safeway last week and wanted to get some vanilla ice cream. >>> There wasn't any. There were about 20 weird flavors, mango and banana >>> and worse. I got dulce de leche, as close as they had. >>> >>> Try to buy plain potato chips. They are hard to find. >> >> Do you mean ready salted, or do you have the ones with the salt in a >> little bag? > > Plain means salted to me. Not bbq, not cheese flavor, not Flaming Hot, > just potatoes and salt. We call that "ready salted" in the UK. I'm not aware of unsalted crisps. CRISPS. Chips are what yanks call fries. Is there no end to their ignorance? >> Before they found a way to flavour "crisps" (as we call them) all our >> crisps were plain, with salt in a little screw of blue paper so you >> could add as much or little as you liked. Now you can get plain with the >> salt in a little blue bag. > > I've never seen that here, separate salt. Would anyone like unsalted > chips? Seems unlikely. "Salt'n'shake" they're called in the UK, I forget the manufacturer. My mum sent me to school with them in primary school, so I would not eat salt which she thought was bad for me. Of course I ignored her and used the salt. Without salt plain crisps taste like cardboard. > One advantage of separate salt would be that the salt is hygroscopic > so makes the chips age faster once the bag is open. But stashing them > in a ziploc fixes that, or just eating all of them at once. > > I wonder if the chips are packaged in nitrogen or something to keep > them fresher. Pringles have it worked out. A solid tube to stop crushing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 09:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mntvbi9ihj847059vfslf4kcllb5vvo00e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #701888 |
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:02:37 +0100, "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote: >On Sun, 28 May 2023 18:00:13 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 28 May 2023 11:55:19 +0100, Max Demian >> <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >> >>> On 27/05/2023 21:42, John Larkin wrote: >>>> On Sat, 27 May 2023 20:42:57 +0100, Max Demian >>>> <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>>> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> We never had food rationing. >>>>>> >>>>>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >>>>> >>>>> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >>>>> flavours? >>>> >>>> Dark days. >>> >>> That used to be a dig at the lack of onerous rationing in the US in WW2. >> >> Back then, there were three ice cream flavors. > >I've only ever had chocolate, vanilla (which I always thought meant plain, but I think that's "manilla"), and strawberry. My sister ate mint which I detested. > >>>> I was at Safeway last week and wanted to get some vanilla ice cream. >>>> There wasn't any. There were about 20 weird flavors, mango and banana >>>> and worse. I got dulce de leche, as close as they had. >>>> >>>> Try to buy plain potato chips. They are hard to find. >>> >>> Do you mean ready salted, or do you have the ones with the salt in a >>> little bag? >> >> Plain means salted to me. Not bbq, not cheese flavor, not Flaming Hot, >> just potatoes and salt. > >We call that "ready salted" in the UK. I'm not aware of unsalted crisps. CRISPS. Chips are what yanks call fries. Is there no end to their ignorance? I sentence you to eating British food for the rest of your life. That's cruel but just.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 19:14 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE Alert! |
| Message-ID | <rqTvM.34904$zW7d.30725@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #701935 |
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 09:25:20 -0700, John Larkin, another obviously brain dead, troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered: > I sentence you to eating British food for the rest of your life. > That's cruel but just. No problem at all for the gay Scottish wanker, as it is the troll-fodder senile assholes like you keep feeding him with that keeps him going!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-27 08:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7c994c90-0f89-413f-931e-c6e8e31c5aban@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #701935 |
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:25:35 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:02:37 +0100, "Commander Kinsey" > <C...@nospam.com> wrote: > > >On Sun, 28 May 2023 18:00:13 +0100, John Larkin <jla...@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 28 May 2023 11:55:19 +0100, Max Demian > >> <max_d...@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On 27/05/2023 21:42, John Larkin wrote: > >>>> On Sat, 27 May 2023 20:42:57 +0100, Max Demian > >>>> <max_d...@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >>>>> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > >>>>>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jla...@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote: <snip> > >We call that "ready salted" in the UK. I'm not aware of unsalted crisps. CRISPS. Chips are what yanks call fries. Is there no end to their ignorance? > > I sentence you to eating British food for the rest of your life. That's cruel but just. There is no such thing as British food. There may be English food, Welsh food and Scottish food - the Scottish wanker probably eats that. There's nothing particularly cruel about sentencing him to eat that - he clearly doesn't know any better. Forcing him to eat better would be cruel to the rest of us - he'd probably live longer. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 19:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kdhohtFiqgbU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #696747 |
On Sun, 28 May 2023 11:55:19 +0100, Max Demian wrote: > Do you mean ready salted, or do you have the ones with the salt in a > little bag? > > Before they found a way to flavour "crisps" (as we call them) all our > crisps were plain, with salt in a little screw of blue paper so you > could add as much or little as you liked. Now you can get plain with the > salt in a little blue bag. I've never seen chips with separate salt. You can find unsalted but they assume you don't want salt and don't provide any.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 22:34 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: lowbrowwoman, the Endlessly Driveling Senile Gossip |
| Message-ID | <jVOcM.2799809$geq2.2532406@usenetxs.com> |
| In reply to | #696783 |
On 28 May 2023 19:32:14 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling, troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again: > I've never seen chips with separate salt. You can find unsalted but they > assume you don't want salt and don't provide any. THRILLING conversation! Now it's about chips with and without salt! About time you useless senile idiots got euthanized! -- More of the resident senile gossip's absolutely idiotic endless blather about herself: "My family and I traveled cross country in '52, going out on the northern route and returning mostly on Rt 66. We also traveled quite a bit as the interstates were being built. It might have been slower but it was a lot more interesting. Even now I prefer what William Least Heat-Moon called the blue highways but it's difficult. Around here there are remnants of the Mullan Road as frontage roads but I-90 was laid over most of it so there is no continuous route. So far 93 hasn't been destroyed." MID: <kae9ivF7suU1@mid.individual.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 06:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.18miv8olmvhs6z@ryzen> |
| In reply to | #696652 |
On Sat, 27 May 2023 21:42:26 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote: > On Sat, 27 May 2023 20:42:57 +0100, Max Demian > <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > >> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote: >> >>>> We never had food rationing. >>> >>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >> >> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >> flavours? > > Dark days. > > I was at Safeway last week and wanted to get some vanilla ice cream. > There wasn't any. There were about 20 weird flavors, mango and banana > and worse. I got dulce de leche, as close as they had. > > Try to buy plain potato chips. They are hard to find. I just found my supermarket with no oranges! Apparently, it's too hot to pick them in Spain. Dafuq? Surely those fields must be watered, so just use that water to spray any overheated workers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-27 21:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <wyucM.3701380$vBI8.2145099@fx15.iad> |
| In reply to | #696643 |
On 2023-05-27, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: > On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote: > >>> We never had food rationing. >> >> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. > > Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream > flavours? Your point that our rationing wasn't as bad as your rationing is taken. However, the U.S. had rationing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationing_in_the_United_States#World_War_II Of course our food rationing wasn't as bad as yours, because we had a lot more acreage under cultivation. And nobody was bombing it. "At the start of the Second World War in 1939, the United Kingdom was importing 20 million long tons of food per year, including about 70% of its cheese and sugar, almost 80% of fruit and about 70% of cereals and fats. The UK also imported more than half of its meat and relied on imported feed to support its domestic meat production." You guys were in real trouble, no doubt about it. -- Cindy Hamilton
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 09:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <u4v47h$pvfh$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #696658 |
On 27/05/2023 22:24, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > On 2023-05-27, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote: >> >>>> We never had food rationing. >>> >>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >> >> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >> flavours? > > Your point that our rationing wasn't as bad as your rationing is taken. > However, the U.S. had rationing. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationing_in_the_United_States#World_War_II > > Of course our food rationing wasn't as bad as yours, because we had > a lot more acreage under cultivation. And nobody was bombing it. > > "At the start of the Second World War in 1939, the United Kingdom was > importing 20 million long tons of food per year, including about 70% of > its cheese and sugar, almost 80% of fruit and about 70% of cereals and > fats. The UK also imported more than half of its meat and relied on > imported feed to support its domestic meat production." > > You guys were in real trouble, no doubt about it. > While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked you in the balls. -- All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is fully understood.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 10:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <t5277idv3bmq8vbcp79og69vo33i6bn3al@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #696738 |
On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:43:29 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >On 27/05/2023 22:24, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >> On 2023-05-27, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> We never had food rationing. >>>> >>>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >>> >>> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >>> flavours? >> >> Your point that our rationing wasn't as bad as your rationing is taken. >> However, the U.S. had rationing. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationing_in_the_United_States#World_War_II >> >> Of course our food rationing wasn't as bad as yours, because we had >> a lot more acreage under cultivation. And nobody was bombing it. >> >> "At the start of the Second World War in 1939, the United Kingdom was >> importing 20 million long tons of food per year, including about 70% of >> its cheese and sugar, almost 80% of fruit and about 70% of cereals and >> fats. The UK also imported more than half of its meat and relied on >> imported feed to support its domestic meat production." >> >> You guys were in real trouble, no doubt about it. >> >While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked you >in the balls. The US population was wary of millenia of non-stop european wars. As continue today. We could have made more money selling food and weapons to England and Germany.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u509hr$jg75$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #696772 |
Am 28.05.23 um 19:03 schrieb John Larkin: > The US population was wary of millenia of non-stop european wars. As > continue today. Yes, they managed 12 years of peace or so since the declaration of independence upto now, and before that, in statu nascendi, war against the Mexicans or Indians or British. And if no one else was available, the mutual other half of themselves. Gerhard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 08:09 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.15oc6tcgbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #696772 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 03:03:38 +1000, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote: > On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:43:29 +0100, The Natural Philosopher > <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On 27/05/2023 22:24, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>> On 2023-05-27, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> We never had food rationing. >>>>> >>>>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >>>> >>>> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >>>> flavours? >>> >>> Your point that our rationing wasn't as bad as your rationing is taken. >>> However, the U.S. had rationing. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationing_in_the_United_States#World_War_II >>> >>> Of course our food rationing wasn't as bad as yours, because we had >>> a lot more acreage under cultivation. And nobody was bombing it. >>> >>> "At the start of the Second World War in 1939, the United Kingdom was >>> importing 20 million long tons of food per year, including about 70% of >>> its cheese and sugar, almost 80% of fruit and about 70% of cereals and >>> fats. The UK also imported more than half of its meat and relied on >>> imported feed to support its domestic meat production." >>> >>> You guys were in real trouble, no doubt about it. >>> >> While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked you >> in the balls. > The US population was wary of millenia of non-stop european wars. Yes. > As > continue today. Not in western europe they don't. > We could have made more money selling food and weapons to England and > Germany.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 02:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kdig5dFmavpU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #696797 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:09:55 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2023 03:03:38 +1000, John Larkin > <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:43:29 +0100, The Natural Philosopher >> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 27/05/2023 22:24, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>> On 2023-05-27, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>>> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> We never had food rationing. >>>>>> >>>>>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >>>>> >>>>> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >>>>> flavours? >>>> >>>> Your point that our rationing wasn't as bad as your rationing is >>>> taken. However, the U.S. had rationing. >>>> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Rationing_in_the_United_States#World_War_II >>>> >>>> Of course our food rationing wasn't as bad as yours, because we had a >>>> lot more acreage under cultivation. And nobody was bombing it. >>>> >>>> "At the start of the Second World War in 1939, the United Kingdom was >>>> importing 20 million long tons of food per year, including about 70% >>>> of its cheese and sugar, almost 80% of fruit and about 70% of cereals >>>> and fats. The UK also imported more than half of its meat and relied >>>> on imported feed to support its domestic meat production." >>>> >>>> You guys were in real trouble, no doubt about it. >>>> >>> While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked >>> you in the balls. > >> The US population was wary of millenia of non-stop european wars. > > Yes. > >> As continue today. > > Not in western europe they don't. Western Europe doesn't have the wherewithal to have a good, old fashioned war. That may be why they're so fascinated with a proxy war in eastern Europe. Britain still thinks it's in a position to affect the balance of power on the continent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 13:34 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.15or7eftbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #696802 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 12:15:09 +1000, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2023 08:09:55 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > >> On Mon, 29 May 2023 03:03:38 +1000, John Larkin >> <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 28 May 2023 09:43:29 +0100, The Natural Philosopher >>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 27/05/2023 22:24, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>> On 2023-05-27, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 27/05/2023 16:50, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>>>>> On 2023-05-27, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> We never had food rationing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> During WWII we did. Our rationing ended long before the UK's. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you mean when Americans only had 15 different kinds of ice cream >>>>>> flavours? >>>>> >>>>> Your point that our rationing wasn't as bad as your rationing is >>>>> taken. However, the U.S. had rationing. >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ > Rationing_in_the_United_States#World_War_II >>>>> >>>>> Of course our food rationing wasn't as bad as yours, because we had a >>>>> lot more acreage under cultivation. And nobody was bombing it. >>>>> >>>>> "At the start of the Second World War in 1939, the United Kingdom was >>>>> importing 20 million long tons of food per year, including about 70% >>>>> of its cheese and sugar, almost 80% of fruit and about 70% of cereals >>>>> and fats. The UK also imported more than half of its meat and relied >>>>> on imported feed to support its domestic meat production." >>>>> >>>>> You guys were in real trouble, no doubt about it. >>>>> >>>> While you guys sat back and made money out of us, till Japan kicked >>>> you in the balls. >> >>> The US population was wary of millenia of non-stop european wars. >> >> Yes. >> >>> As continue today. >> >> Not in western europe they don't. > Western Europe doesn't have the wherewithal to have a good, old fashioned > war. Pity about WW1 and all the wars there before that. > That may be why they're so fascinated with a proxy war in eastern > Europe. Nope, that's because they noticed what happened when no one did anything about Hitler's invasions until he invaded Poland. > Britain still thinks it's in a position to affect the balance of > power on the continent. Bullshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 06:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kdiutkFomutU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #696808 |
On Mon, 29 May 2023 13:34:16 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: >> Western Europe doesn't have the wherewithal to have a good, old >> fashioned war. > > Pity about WW1 and all the wars there before that. I'm talking about here and now. 'does not' indicates the present tense. >> That may be why they're so fascinated with a proxy war in eastern >> Europe. > > Nope, that's because they noticed what happened when no one did anything > about Hitler's invasions until he invaded Poland. How did Britain's guarantees work out for Poland? >> Britain still thinks it's in a position to affect the balance of power >> on the continent. > > Bullshit. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-61052643 Johnson couldn't even help himself but he egged on Zelensky. Sunak is continuing the tradition.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-29 17:11 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.15o18xjhbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #696816 |
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >>> Western Europe doesn't have the wherewithal to have a good, old >>> fashioned war. >> Pity about WW1 and all the wars there before that. > I'm talking about here and now. 'does not' indicates the present tense. Still completely wrong as Iraq and Afghanistan proves. >>> That may be why they're so fascinated with a proxy war in eastern >>> Europe. >> Nope, that's because they noticed what happened when no one did anything >> about Hitler's invasions until he invaded Poland. > How did Britain's guarantees work out for Poland? Irrelevant. It did put a stop to Hitler's military adventurism, eventually. >>> Britain still thinks it's in a position to affect the balance of power >>> on the continent. >> Bullshit. > https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-61052643 Just because some fool lefty journo claims something... > Johnson couldn't even help himself but he egged on Zelensky. Sunak is > continuing the tradition. Wrong, neither has anything to do with balance of power.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 34 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design
csiph-web