Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #726027
| From | piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Op-amp mystery |
| Date | 2024-09-12 08:27 +0100 |
| Organization | A patent noisesome spinner |
| Message-ID | <vbu558$4nm1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <1qznz5d.1m219rjmrzni6N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <rhm0ejtf032lq1g2q7kkvl20081gsd1v8r@4ax.com> <vbt7de$3r928$2@dont-email.me> |
On 11/09/2024 23:59, Lasse Langwadt wrote: > On 9/10/24 16:47, john larkin wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:31:37 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid >> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: >> >>> It's always the stupid things that cause the most trouble: >>> >>> I was working on a fairly straightforward experimental audio circuit >>> using TL074 op-amps laid out on Veroboard, which is prone to inter-track >>> shorts unless you are very careful with your soldering. The gain of a >>> virtual-earth stage was too high, so I altered some resistor values to >>> cut it down. >> >> Show us a pic of your breadboard! >> >>> >>> As this was a stereo system, I experimented with one channel first and >>> then switched off and replaced the equivalent resistors in the second >>> channel (one of the other op-amps in the same chip). >>> >>> The input signal was a 6 Kc/s sinwave at about -10 dBu. After the >>> modification, the volume control, which was in a feedback loop, didnt >>> seem to make much difference. Then I realised that applying the signal >>> to the left channel gave a distorted version of it in the right channel >>> and vice-versa. Obviously I had shorted two tracks somewhere - but >>> where? >>> >>> Things got even worse when I realised that the input signal was >>> appearing on the virtual earth input of each op-amp, this definitely >>> can't happen! I decided it was time to switch off the power supply and >>> go and ponder the problem over a cup of tea. >>> >>> That was the point where I discovered I hadn't switched the power supply >>> on in the first place. >> >> Sometimes people note that a CMOS circuit works properly with no power >> supply, because some ESD diodes are rectifying a logic input. > > until all the inputs are low, then it only works until the bypass cap is > discharged ;) > > seem to remember seeing a boost converter made from just a cmos gate and > an inductor, using the output as input and the supply pins as output via > the ESD diodes, but I can't find it again, but I found this > > https://www.edn.com/efficient-voltage-doubler-is-made-from-generic-cmos-inverters/ > > > It is possible you were remembering my posting this in April 2016: <https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8n4fz5o0r79rkmbn05j1a/micropowerBoost.pdf?rlkey=v1w9vm0his1pzd3lwd93dsm3v&st=5x8irpk6&raw=1> All power flows through the inductor. The ESD diodes are only involved during startup, once oscillator running the output stage n-fet is the boost switch and the p-fet is the synchronous rectifier. A version built using 74HC132 was in a successful product which needed micropower 5V from 2-3V input. piglet
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Op-amp mystery liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2024-09-10 10:31 +0100
Re: Op-amp mystery Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2024-09-10 05:27 -0700
Re: Op-amp mystery john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> - 2024-09-10 07:47 -0700
Re: Op-amp mystery Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-10 15:05 +0000
Re: Op-amp mystery Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2024-09-12 00:59 +0200
Re: Op-amp mystery Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2024-09-11 19:00 -0700
Re: Op-amp mystery john larkin <JL@gct.com> - 2024-09-11 19:10 -0700
Re: Op-amp mystery piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2024-09-12 08:27 +0100
Re: Op-amp mystery Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-12 10:12 +0000
Re: Op-amp mystery liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2024-09-12 13:21 +0100
Re: Op-amp mystery piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2024-09-12 14:34 +0000
Re: Op-amp mystery liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2024-09-12 18:03 +0100
Re: Op-amp mystery John Robertson <jrr@flippers.com> - 2024-09-10 12:38 -0700
Re: Op-amp mystery Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2024-09-11 12:15 -0700
Re: Op-amp mystery liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2024-09-11 21:35 +0100
Re: Op-amp mystery Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2024-09-11 18:37 -0700
Re: Op-amp mystery legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> - 2024-09-11 09:29 -0400
csiph-web