Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > sci.electronics.design > #725914

Re: Better cheaper super capacitors

Show all headers | View raw

On a sunny day (Sun, 08 Sep 2024 08:41:59 -0700) it happened john larkin
<jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in <j5hrdjd6jnctnbfenh074cgjjfe0koq5k4@4ax.com>:

>On Sun, 08 Sep 2024 07:34:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>>On a sunny day (Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:45:22 -0700) it happened john larkin
>><jlarkin_highland_tech> wrote in <stsodj1etjq4bnfbea9gqlbeefbf40p4pr@4ax.com>:
>>
>>>On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 05:24:50 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Achieving a supercapacitor through the 'molecular coating' approach
>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240905121043.htm
>>>
>>>I doubt that supercaps will ever achieve the energy density of
>>>batteries, and if they get close they will be equally explosive.
>>>
>>>People are inventing super "capacitors" that sound awfully
>>>electrochemical to me.
>>>
>>>The threshold for a press release seems to be to make something that
>>>will light an LED, which takes about a microwatt.
>>
>>Yes, new batteries are invented every week it seems.
>>Now super capacitors too
>>We will have to wait for it to be in the shops.
>>
>
>Methane has half the carbon of a long-chain liquid hydrocarbon. In
>most situations, a 2:1 improvement is considered to be pretty good.
>CNG cars work.  But the greenies hate methane. As they hate nukes and
>hydro power.
>
>They hate energy.

Those greens should be sent to re-eduction camps
None of them would be around if it was not for technology.

There was an other bunch of greens chaining themselves to a museum entrance in Amsterdam last week.
They had to be cut lose...
I think their argument was that ING bank had something to do with CO2 and financed the museum?
 https://www.dutchnews.nl/2024/09/extinction-rebellions-anti-ing-protest-closes-rijksmuseum/

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Better cheaper super capacitors Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-07 05:24 +0000
  Re: Better cheaper super capacitors john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> - 2024-09-07 08:45 -0700
    Re: Better cheaper super capacitors Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-08 07:34 +0000
      Re: Better cheaper super capacitors john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> - 2024-09-08 08:41 -0700
        Re: Better cheaper super capacitors Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2024-09-09 02:14 +1000
          Re: Better cheaper super capacitors liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2024-09-09 09:18 +0100
            Re: Better cheaper super capacitors Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2024-09-10 00:14 +1000
        Re: Better cheaper super capacitors Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-09 06:36 +0000
          Re: Better cheaper super capacitors Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2024-09-09 17:31 +1000
          Re: Better cheaper super capacitors john larkin <jlarkin_highland_tech> - 2024-09-09 08:48 -0700
            Re: Better cheaper super capacitors Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2024-09-10 23:38 +1000
    Re: Better cheaper super capacitors Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> - 2024-09-10 19:48 +0000
      Re: Better cheaper super capacitors Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2024-09-11 13:01 +1000
        Re: Better cheaper super capacitors liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2024-09-11 12:52 +0100
          Re: Better cheaper super capacitors Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2024-09-11 23:56 +1000

csiph-web