Groups > sci.electronics.design > #725731

nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name...

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name...
Date	Thu, 05 Sep 2024 05:20:08 GMT
Message-ID	<vbbf28$25r6n$1@solani.org> (permalink)
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Date	Thu, 5 Sep 2024 05:20:08 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	solani.org; logging-data="2288855"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent	NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (Linux-5.15.32-v7l+)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:iAfgdEkZIqdZfVAROKd97luIBI4=
X-User-ID	eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLFAjp5JTPv4TdweJE0QPhWOx83Fc+1+BHvCTE3qZkX26ScRvg0dJCUGeLO6+7ciTM9AdZ7RXz
X-Newsreader-location	NewsFleX-1.5.7.5 (c) 'LIGHTSPEED' off line news reader for the Linux platform NewsFleX homepage: http://www.panteltje.nl/panteltje/newsflex/ and ftp download ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/linux/system/news/readers/
Xref	csiph.com sci.electronics.design:725731

Show key headers only | View raw

Major leap for nuclear clock paves way for ultraprecise timekeeping
 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240904130817.htm
 September 4, 2024
Source:
 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Summary:
 Nuclear clocks would measure time based on changes inside an atom's nucleus,
 which would make them less sensitive to external disturbances and potentially
 more accurate than atomic clocks.
 These clocks could lead to improved timekeeping and navigation,
 faster internet speeds, and advances in fundamental physics research.
 Scientists have demonstrated key components of a nuclear clock,
 such as precise frequency measurements of an energy jump in a thorium-229
 nucleus.

future babble?
Paper is 25 dollars measured at today's nuclear inflation time, eh speed
I would have thought that NIST, financed by public money,
would publish their papers for free for thee.

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

nuclear clock better then  'atomic' clock?? What's in a name... Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-05 05:20 +0000
  Re: nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name... Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2024-09-05 10:11 +0200
    Re: nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name... Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-05 09:51 +0000
  Re: nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name... Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2024-09-05 10:32 +0100
    Re: nuclear clock better then 'atomic' clock?? What's in a name... Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2024-09-05 10:03 +0000

csiph-web