Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #742756
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: energy and mass |
| Date | 2026-04-06 12:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <n3hh09FrmgkU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (23 earlier) <10qjdum$ad1m$3@dont-email.me> <n39bl5Fj48bU3@mid.individual.net> <10qop4i$27kr$2@dont-email.me> <n3ejehFdif4U2@mid.individual.net> <10qtf7r$1bhck$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Am Sonntag000005, 05.04.2026 um 12:58 schrieb Bill Sloman: > On 5/04/2026 6:14 pm, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am Freitag000003, 03.04.2026 um 18:16 schrieb Bill Sloman: >>> On 3/04/2026 7:31 pm, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> Am Mittwoch000001, 01.04.2026 um 17:34 schrieb Bill Sloman: >>> >>> <snipped lots of wishful thinking> >>> >>>> what made these steel beams rust overnight? >>> >>> Encasing steel beams in concrete doesn't stop them rusting. It they'd >>> been bare, the fire would have stripped off any corrosion protection >>> they had, and got them hot enough to encourage rather rapid oxidation. >>> >> >> 'Rapid rust' was among the strangest things happening at 9/11! >> >> MANY massive steel items collected rusted almost instantly. That were >> not only steel beems of adjacent buildings, but lots of other items >> collected rust very fast. >> >> That was a VERY (!!) unusual phenomenon. >> >> Usually it can take weeks for bare steel to rust, even in 'hostile' >> environments. > > If you want to speed up a chemical reaction, get the reagents hot. > > The Twin Towers fell down because the fire started by crashing the jet > planes into the buildings got hot enough to weaken the steel frames. > It also got them hot enough to rust remarkably rapidly. Well, possibly... But adjacent buildings were not hit by planes and didn't burn. E.g. have a look at this picture: https://www.redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/local/news-articles/greater-new-york/1-36484-003-1000x1213.jpg Here you can see a building, which wasn't hit by a plane, but is quite rusty. This means, that rust appeared almost instantly. There were also these 'half-burned cars', where the burned side was also very rusty, while the other half of the same car was still undamaged. That was all VERY strange! My current guess: there was an invisible field in action (possibly 'scalar waves'), which was tuned to resonate with steel and concrete. This was centered around the twin-towers and was able to turn Steel-beams into fine dust and less resonant steel at least into rust. That was something like a HUGE 'microwave oven', which turned the large buildings into molten metal and dust and cars and other stuff into rust. What was entirely unharmed was apparently paper, which managed to fly away from the towers, while the metal cabinets these papers were stored turned into dust. TH
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-25 22:01 +1100
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-03-26 15:00 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-27 02:47 +1100
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-03-27 09:13 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 03:17 +1100
Re: energy and mass liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-03-27 20:58 +0000
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 16:27 +1100
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-03-29 10:19 +0200
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-31 02:45 +1100
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-03-31 09:39 +0200
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-31 23:10 +1100
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-01 09:47 +0200
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-02 02:34 +1100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-04-01 18:23 +0200
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-03 10:12 +0200
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-03 23:42 +1100
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-05 09:57 +0200
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-06 02:53 +1000
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-06 13:09 +0200
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-07 04:11 +1000
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-08 09:13 +0200
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-08 22:56 +1000
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-03 10:31 +0200
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-04 03:16 +1100
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 09:38 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-04 04:15 +1100
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-04-03 23:18 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-04 21:37 +1100
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-05 10:14 +0200
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-05 20:58 +1000
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-04-06 12:51 +0200
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-07 04:27 +1000
csiph-web