Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #742742
| From | "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: silly circuit |
| Date | 2026-04-05 14:07 -0400 |
| Organization | BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) |
| Message-ID | <10qu8c8$2jcs$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <10qsqri$3p8$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <kf84tkdpb8lhopo3eleaieijfrqshir35i@4ax.com> <10qu4d1$1hgp3$3@dont-email.me> <pp55tkl7jus0uop3h3bt5st608578b4gau@4ax.com> <10qu787$1ije3$1@dont-email.me> |
"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:10qu787$1ije3$1@dont-email.me... > On 6/04/2026 3:10 am, john larkin wrote: >> On Mon, 6 Apr 2026 02:59:12 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >> wrote: >> >>> On 5/04/2026 6:57 pm, john larkin wrote: >>>> On Sun, 5 Apr 2026 01:10:08 -0400, "Edward Rawde" >>>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:10qsnim$15pr5$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>> On 5/04/2026 12:37 pm, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Apr 2026 12:24:42 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/04/2026 11:07 am, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:56:47 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> Let's see Bill's circuit next. >>> >>> You needed find somebody silly enough to take this nonsense seriously. >>> Edward Rawde is apparently willing to play with you. I'm happy to leave >>> you in his capable hands. >> >> Please don't think that I am mocking you for being unable to design >> simple circuits. That would be unkind. > > I can't see why you bothered to post the EDN circuit in the first place. > It's obvious how it works. Without a specific load there's not a lot of point in discussing it and plausible alternatives. What's hard to understand about two or more LXZ1-PB01 LEDs? 12V isn't hard to find. > > You don't seem to have enough sense to realise this. I suppose I could mock you about that, but you do a pretty good job of > sending yourself up all on your own. > > -- > Bill Sloman, Sydney
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 13:56 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-03 16:45 +1100
Re: silly circuit piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-03 06:47 +0000
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-03 04:31 -0700
Re: silly circuit "Don" <g@crcomp.net> - 2026-04-08 15:51 +0000
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-03 08:20 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-04 03:10 +1100
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-03 09:29 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-04 04:48 +1100
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-03 14:07 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-04 17:33 +1100
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-04 03:59 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-05 00:35 +1100
Re: silly circuit someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> - 2026-04-09 03:30 +0000
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 13:27 -0400
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-04 17:22 +1100
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-04 18:07 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-05 12:24 +1000
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-04 19:37 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-05 14:14 +1000
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-05 01:10 -0400
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-05 01:57 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-06 02:59 +1000
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-05 10:10 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-06 03:47 +1000
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-05 11:02 -0700
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-05 14:07 -0400
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-05 12:23 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-06 15:01 +1000
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-06 07:25 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-07 03:47 +1000
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-06 12:08 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-07 16:34 +1000
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-07 11:02 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-08 23:28 +1000
Re: silly circuit piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-08 16:13 +0000
Re: silly circuit piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-07 15:58 +0100
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-07 09:00 -0700
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-08 23:48 +1000
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-08 09:41 -0700
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-06 11:56 -0400
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-07 03:55 +1000
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-06 14:12 -0400
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-07 16:05 +1000
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-07 09:27 -0400
Re: silly circuit Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-08 01:53 +1000
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-07 09:06 -0700
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-07 12:46 -0400
Re: silly circuit john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-07 11:31 -0700
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-07 16:06 -0400
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-07 16:12 -0400
Re: silly circuit JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-04-08 00:50 +0100
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-07 22:35 -0400
Re: silly circuit "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-05 22:16 -0400
Re: silly circuit piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-05 22:27 +0100
Re: silly circuit someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> - 2026-04-09 03:45 +0000
A fully floating BJT-based LED current driver "Don" <g@crcomp.net> - 2026-04-09 09:17 +0000
Re: A fully floating BJT-based LED current driver JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-04-09 16:16 +0100
Re: A fully floating BJT-based LED current driver "Don" <g@crcomp.net> - 2026-04-09 22:03 +0000
Re: A fully floating BJT-based LED current driver john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-09 16:46 -0700
Re: A fully floating BJT-based LED current driver john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-09 16:57 -0700
Re: A fully floating BJT-based LED current driver "Don" <g@crcomp.net> - 2026-04-10 03:24 +0000
Re: A fully floating BJT-based LED current driver JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-04-10 17:34 +0100
csiph-web