Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #740992
| From | Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: new X-chapters |
| Date | 2026-02-25 11:28 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10nmisp$p9mh$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <10nf6jd$1i0vh$1@ehsjr.eternal-september.org> <n06g9rFnlhfU1@mid.individual.net> <eoespkhg2b5h5i35385pii69uq312v5nq6@4ax.com> <10nlgh3$nusr$1@solani.org> <ntpspk9iqcth4ak77qtjbr3g9j38guflh2@4ax.com> |
Am 25.02.26 um 04:44 schrieb john larkin: > You are using fancier connectors with tiny center pins. I'm using the > really cheap, under $2, ones with giant round center pins. An e/m sim > says that the pin alone, not on a board, is about 100 ohms. One can see the influence of the SMA center connector on the picture of the solder-friendly board on the unpopulated side. The dip is by far not as severe. > > Why do people make such a big deal over right-angle trace bends? I've > never seen one on my 30 ps TDR. I wanted to make sure that I don't ask for trouble if I meander from a ball grid array. > I cut away all the planes under the connector center pin and pave over > the bottom side with copper. That just about works. ... but have enough gnd vias around. *ON* the board it's layer L2 that counts for GND. > > Most of the JLCPCB 4 and 6-layer stacks have absurdly thin L1-L2 > dielectrics. A couple have double prepreg, thicker dielectric, so let > you make fatter traces, like 20 mils for 50 ohms. Less loss. For a NMR project on 8 GHz, I had a mixed Rogers TMM-6 & FR4 board. Not from JLCPCB but the customer's favourite shop around the corner. The strip lines ended up on the FR-4 side, power supply on TMM_6. Yes, we *had* talked about the stackup. It's clearly the best not to expect people thinking or to deviate from their daily routine. BTW, TMM-6 is a brittle, ugly material which feels much like an eraser gum. I would not use it alone without FR4 for mechanical reasons. We used to build oil/gaz pipeline pigs. FR4 may soak up hydrocarbons and swell. That may crack the vias open. So we went to boards made from Kapton. Be alarmed when the factory offers short production times. Kapton prepregs have a shelf live of only a few weeks. They may be tempted sell you prepregs that are left over from a project half a year ago. Your boards will de-laminate after two weeks in the field. Been there, seen that, with luxury top notch FPGAs that cost 1000s. :-( cheers, Gerhard
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-21 10:43 -0800
Re:new X-chapters Martin Rid <martin_riddle@verison.net> - 2026-02-21 15:25 -0500
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-23 11:00 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2026-02-23 14:39 -0500
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-23 14:25 -0800
Re: new X-chapters JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-02-23 22:42 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-23 14:54 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2026-02-23 20:17 -0500
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-23 19:18 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-24 17:27 +1100
Re: new X-chapters Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2026-02-24 14:01 -0500
Re: new X-chapters Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2026-02-23 23:23 +0100
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-23 19:19 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-24 17:32 +1100
Re: new X-chapters Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-02-24 14:53 -0800
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-24 15:57 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-02-24 19:12 -0500
Re: new X-chapters "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-24 21:04 -0500
Re: new X-chapters JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 02:25 +0000
Re: new X-chapters "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-24 22:28 -0500
Re: new X-chapters John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 08:46 +0000
Re: new X-chapters liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-02-25 09:39 +0000
Re: new X-chapters JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-02-26 00:12 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-25 04:15 -0800
Re: new X-chapters liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-02-25 14:04 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-25 07:58 -0800
Re: new X-chapters liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-02-25 19:31 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-25 14:13 -0800
Re: new X-chapters liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-02-25 22:51 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-25 16:30 -0800
Re: new X-chapters liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-02-26 09:57 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-26 08:22 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-27 03:51 +1100
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-26 09:03 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-27 17:04 +1100
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-27 03:45 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-28 03:56 +1100
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-27 10:18 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-28 17:29 +1100
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-26 22:51 +1100
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-26 22:49 +1100
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-26 22:44 +1100
Re: new X-chapters Glen Walpert <nospam@null.void> - 2026-02-25 18:44 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-25 14:24 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-02-26 07:11 +0000
Re: new X-chapters Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-02-25 06:52 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-25 09:58 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-02-26 07:06 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-26 08:32 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-02-26 17:52 +0000
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-27 17:26 +1100
Re: new X-chapters Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-02-27 13:31 +0000
Re: new X-chapters liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-02-27 09:48 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-27 10:15 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-28 05:20 +1100
Re: new X-chapters Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-02-27 21:09 +0100
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-27 20:01 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2026-02-28 10:22 +0100
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-01 01:08 +1100
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-28 07:51 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-02-28 12:48 -0500
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-28 10:07 -0800
Re: new X-chapters liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-02-27 21:02 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-27 14:28 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-28 17:38 +1100
Re: new X-chapters Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2026-02-28 10:17 +0100
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-28 07:52 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-02-28 22:35 +0000
Re: new X-chapters Jim Jackson <jj@franjam.org.uk> - 2026-02-28 12:30 +0000
Re: new X-chapters Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-02-28 23:53 +1100
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-28 07:53 -0800
Re: new X-chapters liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-03-01 19:58 +0000
Re: new X-chapters Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-03-01 20:16 +0000
Re: new X-chapters liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-03-01 21:37 +0000
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-01 13:43 -0800
Re: new X-chapters antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-02-28 14:07 +0000
Re: new X-chapters Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2026-02-24 20:15 -0500
Re: new X-chapters Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-02-21 14:10 -0800
Re: new X-chapters ehsjr <ehsjr@verizon.net> - 2026-02-22 10:15 -0500
Re: new X-chapters Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2026-02-24 12:34 -0800
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-24 16:12 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2026-02-25 01:42 +0100
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-24 19:44 -0800
Re: new X-chapters Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2026-02-25 11:28 +0100
Re: new X-chapters john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-02-25 03:57 -0800
csiph-web