Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.components > #5759
| From | Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.basics, sci.electronics.components, sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.repair, alt.engineering.electrical |
| Subject | Re: Transistor identification? |
| Date | 2015-09-18 10:50 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <55FC24CF.8090600@electrooptical.net> (permalink) |
| References | <0001HW.1B9B87FD00098A2611E4F83CF@news.eternal-september.org> <msg61e$b4m$1@dont-email.me> <0001HW.1B9BFB3100248A5811E4F83CF@news.eternal-september.org> <2kEKx.352107$nx.26794@fx16.am4> <l6lmvapme55i8iseujq12jdo1fs69tl6ma@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 09/17/2015 08:05 PM, krw wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 20:16:17 +0100, "Ian Field" > <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote: > >> >> "DaveC" <not@home.cow> wrote in message >> news:0001HW.1B9BFB3100248A5811E4F83CF@news.eternal-september.org... >>>> How's it measure? >>>> >>>> (Or if it's dead, is there another one probably working that you can >>>> test?) >>>> >>>> Tim >>> >>> Dead. Other with identical markings measure as NPN. What else to determine >>> from measurements? >> >> You can usually distinguish the B/E junction because it will zener somewhere >> around 5 - 8V ish. >> >> You need to keep the test current pretty low - you can get ultra-efficient >> LEDs that give a useable indication at only 2mA. Hook one of those up with >> an A23 12V keyfob battery and a current limiting resistor. > > InGaN (true) green LEDs are quite bright at only 1mA. They can be > seen at much less than that. > An ordinary 4-3/4 digit DVM on the lowest volts range (400 mV usually) makes a poor man's picoammeter. The 10 megohm ones read 1 LSB (0.01 mV) for 1 pA. Some of the older ones, where the lowest range doesn't have the 10M resistor in parallel, can be much more sensitive than that. You aren't going to hurt a transistor with a nanoamp of reverse base current, and the measurement is pretty simple. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 160 North State Road #203 Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net
Back to sci.electronics.components | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Transistor identification? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-09-05 13:28 -0700
Re: Transistor identification? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-09-05 14:18 -0700
Re: Transistor identification? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2015-09-05 20:03 -0400
Re: Transistor identification? John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2015-09-05 21:52 -0700
Re: Transistor identification? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-09-05 23:05 -0700
Re: Transistor identification? John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2015-09-06 00:05 -0700
Re: Transistor identification? piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-06 08:11 +0100
Re: Transistor identification? "Tim Williams" <tmoranwms@charter.net> - 2015-09-05 20:52 -0500
Re: Transistor identification? DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2015-09-05 21:40 -0700
Re: Transistor identification? "Tim Williams" <tmoranwms@charter.net> - 2015-09-06 13:03 -0500
Re: Transistor identification? "Ian Field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> - 2015-09-17 20:16 +0100
Re: Transistor identification? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2015-09-17 20:05 -0400
Re: Transistor identification? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2015-09-18 10:50 -0400
Re: Transistor identification? N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> - 2015-09-06 07:46 +0100
Re: Transistor identification? John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2015-09-07 13:29 -0700
csiph-web