IC aging

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix5.panix.com!wb8foz
From	David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.components
Subject	IC aging
Date	Mon, 1 Dec 2025 01:47:52 -0000 (UTC)
Organization	NRK Clinic for habitual NetNews Abusers - Beltway Annex
Message-ID	<10gis48$328$1@reader2.panix.com> (permalink)
Injection-Date	Mon, 1 Dec 2025 01:47:52 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	reader2.panix.com; posting-host="panix5.panix.com:166.84.1.5"; logging-data="3144"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent	nn/6.7.3
Xref	csiph.com sci.electronics.design:738017 sci.electronics.components:6621

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

I'm curious about lifetime of IC's from the 1980's.

Has there been any published work on degradation 
of stored IC's of that era?


-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast...............wb8foz@panix.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close..........................
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433

Back to sci.electronics.components | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

IC aging David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2025-12-01 01:47 +0000
  Re: IC aging Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-12-01 14:33 +1100
  Re: IC aging john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-12-01 10:26 -0800
  Re: IC aging Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> - 2025-12-01 10:38 -0800

csiph-web