Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > openwatcom.users.c_cpp > #3447
| From | "Wilton Helm" <whelm@compuserve.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | openwatcom.users.c_cpp |
| Subject | Re: Saving XMM registers required in assembly functions (DOS / 16-bit)? |
| Date | 2015-07-10 17:05 -0600 |
| Organization | OpenWatcom |
| Message-ID | <mnqbms$gt7$1@www.openwatcom.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mivjjh$atj$1@www.openwatcom.org> |
Unfortunately, trial and error isn't the most reliable teacher, either. That assumes that a register is used in the particular program and that modifying it at that particular place in the code will have visible effects. Particularly with something as specialized as XMM registers, that may not be the case. The compiler probably doesn't use them if there is no FP, for instance, so a given test might not show anything. I have no experience with the compiler internals. The register behavior should be documented in the documentation. Short of that, someone who has worked on the compiler would need to weigh in on whether, and under what condition XMM registers are used for normal C/C++ code and what is done about preserving registers. I looked at the User's guide (the document that generally contains most of this sort of information) and no mention of XMM registers is made. Given that they are part of the SIMD extensions, my guess is that the compiler doesn't use them--i.e. they are only used by library calls designed to take advantage of them or user written assembly code. Since you are talking about DOS / 16-bit, I think I can say for certain that they are not used, because the processors traditionally used for DOS and 16 bit don't have them, so obviously the compiler can't assume them. I realize that it is possible to write 16 bit code on processors with more capability, but the extra capability isn't going to be taken advantage of under those circumstances. Wilton
Back to openwatcom.users.c_cpp | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Saving XMM registers required in assembly functions (DOS / 16-bit)? "Wilton Helm" <whelm@compuserve.com> - 2015-07-10 17:05 -0600
Re: Saving XMM registers required in assembly functions (DOS / 16-bit)? Paul S. Person <psperson@ix.netscom.com.invalid> - 2015-07-11 09:36 -0700
Re: Saving XMM registers required in assembly functions (DOS / 16-bit)? "Marty Stanquist" <martys1ow@att.net> - 2015-07-14 00:08 -0500
csiph-web