Groups > microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript > #12407

Re: System wide memory-only storage?

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!BHGTVyTGRwF2ntnqLVfpDg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	"R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
Newsgroups	microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript
Subject	Re: System wide memory-only storage?
Date	Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:05:49 +0100
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	22
Message-ID	<su0b2f$1ur1$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<1mfe1tm8sv3bn.1od9m321kpijg$.dlg@40tude.net> <stuhlt$6if$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1hm50ti2564b5$.1rkccix2jdsx8$.dlg@40tude.net>
Injection-Info	gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="64353"; posting-host="BHGTVyTGRwF2ntnqLVfpDg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
X-Newsreader	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-RFC2646	Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
X-MSMail-Priority	Normal
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
X-Priority	3
Xref	csiph.com microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript:12407

Show key headers only | View raw

JJ,

> Sorry, but I need to use/borrow existing built in Windows
> applications' functionality. Not creating a custom application.

Than I think you're out of luck.   Although a (vb)script can access a named 
pipe or a mailslot* when one exists, it doesn't seem to be able to create 
one themselves.

*which nowerdays is normally disabled on ones 'puter.

A question though : why the "memory-only" requirement ?   Without it you 
could just use one (or two in case of handshaking).

A quick search for IPC returned this one :

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10943464/inter-process-communication-using-vbscript

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

Back to microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

System wide memory-only storage? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 00:01 +0700
  Re: System wide memory-only storage? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-02-08 20:31 +0100
    Re: System wide memory-only storage? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 17:29 +0700
      Re: System wide memory-only storage? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-02-09 13:05 +0100
        Re: System wide memory-only storage? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2022-02-10 15:56 +0700
          Re: System wide memory-only storage? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-02-10 12:11 +0100
            Re: System wide memory-only storage? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2022-02-12 02:38 +0700
              Re: System wide memory-only storage? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-02-12 11:34 +0100
  Re: System wide memory-only storage? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 14:56 +0700

csiph-web