Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript > #12412
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript |
| Subject | Re: System wide memory-only storage? |
| Date | 2022-02-10 12:11 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <su2rt8$hel$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <1mfe1tm8sv3bn.1od9m321kpijg$.dlg@40tude.net> <stuhlt$6if$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1hm50ti2564b5$.1rkccix2jdsx8$.dlg@40tude.net> <su0b2f$1ur1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <rdxyc0ntlk6e.12cpubnedum12$.dlg@40tude.net> |
JJ, > e.g. a counter for how many times a script has been run, for the current > login session. Kind of like how Windows stores the tick counter, which is > not persistent across system reboot, and always reset at system startup. In that regard (making it session bound) I could imagine a small "erase/create a new statistics file" command/script* in the startup folder (which you than append to in the scripts). Perhaps not perfect, but /should/ give you a clean slate every time. *would even allow you to make some "last X sessions" log-file stack ... > I'm pretty sure there's somewhere in the built in Windows > applications/services which can be used. It's just, it's like > finding a needle in a haystack. Isn't that often the case ? All the "fun stuff" only known by a few, who, more often than not, stumbled over it by those themselves ? Something just occured to me : If the logfile should really disappear on its own why not create a ramdisk and put the logfile on it ? https://www.codeguru.com/windows/ramdisk-version-1-0-for-windows-2000-windows-xp/ Regards, Rudy Wieser
Back to microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
System wide memory-only storage? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 00:01 +0700
Re: System wide memory-only storage? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-02-08 20:31 +0100
Re: System wide memory-only storage? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2022-02-09 17:29 +0700
Re: System wide memory-only storage? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-02-09 13:05 +0100
Re: System wide memory-only storage? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2022-02-10 15:56 +0700
Re: System wide memory-only storage? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-02-10 12:11 +0100
Re: System wide memory-only storage? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2022-02-12 02:38 +0700
Re: System wide memory-only storage? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2022-02-12 11:34 +0100
Re: System wide memory-only storage? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2022-03-13 14:56 +0700
csiph-web