Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #286811

Re: On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and offline availability.)

From "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and offline availability.)
Date 2026-05-22 18:50 +0200
Message-ID <MXBep-74mv-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <MXdvr-6OF1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <MXdvr-6OF1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <MXzPj-73Aj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MXA8G-73Gr-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <MXAs1-73P1-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 5/22/26 8:35 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> A patent covers the method.
> 
> A copyright covers the wording.

More precisely (and note that I'm not an IP attorney, and neither do I 
play one on television, but I do have a general understanding of the 
basics of IP law):

A patent protects an *idea.* It places a very heavy burden of 
proof-of-originality upon the applicant, and has a relatively short term.

A copyright protects an *expression* of an idea. It is very easy to get, 
placing a very heavy burden of proof upon those seeking to invalidate 
it, and has a very long (perhaps too long, these days) term.

And a trademark registration protects a name, logo, or other branding 
identification for a commercial product, from those who would either 
wrongfully profit from the reputation of its maker, or intentionally 
damage that reputation, or both.

--
JHHL

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and  offline availability. Sean Reifschneider <jafo00@gmail.com> - 2026-05-19 17:10 +0200
  Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2026-05-19 17:20 +0200
    Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability  and offline availability. Chime Hart <chime@hubert-humphrey.com> - 2026-05-19 20:10 +0200
      Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability  and offline availability. Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2026-05-19 20:40 +0200
    Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2026-05-19 20:50 +0200
      Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2026-05-19 21:00 +0200
        Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability  and offline availability. The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2026-05-19 21:30 +0200
          Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability  and offline availability. The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2026-05-20 01:10 +0200
            Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability  and offline availability. The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2026-05-20 12:20 +0200
            Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2026-05-20 19:40 +0200
              Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2026-05-20 22:20 +0200
                Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2026-05-21 01:00 +0200
          Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2026-05-20 08:30 +0200
          Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. CGS <etphonehomefrance@gmail.com> - 2026-05-20 18:10 +0200
      Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability  and offline availability. Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2026-05-20 03:20 +0200
        Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2026-05-20 13:20 +0200
        Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. CGS <etphonehomefrance@gmail.com> - 2026-05-20 18:00 +0200
          On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re:  apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and  offline availability.) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2026-05-20 19:20 +0200
            Re: On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re:  apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and  offline availability.) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2026-05-21 14:30 +0200
              Re: On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re:  apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and  offline availability.) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2026-05-21 17:30 +0200
                Re: On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re:  apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and  offline availability.) CGS <etphonehomefrance@gmail.com> - 2026-05-22 17:20 +0200
                Re: On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re:  apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and  offline availability.) CGS <etphonehomefrance@gmail.com> - 2026-05-22 17:40 +0200
                Re: On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re:  apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and  offline availability.) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2026-05-22 18:00 +0200
                Re: On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re:  apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and offline  availability.) "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@touchtonecorp.com> - 2026-05-22 18:50 +0200
                Re: On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re:  apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and  offline availability.) CGS <etphonehomefrance@gmail.com> - 2026-05-24 17:50 +0200
                Re: On the reporting of security bugs discovered by LLM (Was Re:  apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and  offline availability.) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2026-05-22 17:50 +0200
      Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability  and offline availability. Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2026-05-21 00:20 +0200
        Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2026-05-21 00:30 +0200
          Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability  and offline availability. Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2026-05-21 21:20 +0200
  Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2026-05-19 18:40 +0200
    Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2026-05-20 05:50 +0200
      Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on  reliability and offline availability. Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2026-05-20 07:10 +0200
  Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability and offline availability. Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2026-05-22 21:00 +0200
    Re: apt-cacher-ultra beta: Another apt cache, focusing on reliability  and offline availability. Sean Reifschneider <jafo00@gmail.com> - 2026-05-23 19:30 +0200

csiph-web