Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9169
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages |
| Date | 2017-01-18 07:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t0Sed-D1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sIwOR-4kz-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJ5tg-1Kz-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sLHXr-7qQ-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wednesday, December 07, 2016 11:43:29 AM Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Raphael, do you think that the upstream Django project might be willing to > > make some kind of best practices for naming third party django packages? > > If they did that, then that would give us a basis for Debian maintainers > > talking to their upstreams about moving to django_. > > They already partly do that, see: > https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.10/intro/reusable-apps/#packaging-your-a > pp > > They recommend a "django-" prefix in the PyPi package name. But they say > nothing about the Python module name and the sample just bundles a "polls" > module in a "django-polls" package. > > Thus I posted this to gather their feedback on the need to recommend the > prefix on the name of the module too: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-developers/f8yNRkn6Fpo Thanks. Since not everyone liked my first attempt at this, I softened it a bit (please see the attached). We're going to have at least one more python- defaults upload and I'd like to get this resolved. Scott K
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Binary naming for Django Related Packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-11-28 17:20 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 17:40 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 18:00 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 13:50 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-12-03 17:10 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2016-12-03 17:50 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2016-11-28 17:50 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 18:00 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-11-28 18:10 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 14:00 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-11-29 14:20 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 14:50 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-11-30 06:20 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-12-07 11:50 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-01-18 07:50 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2017-01-18 10:50 +0100
Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-12-03 17:10 +0100
csiph-web