Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9050

Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages

From Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages
Date 2016-11-29 14:50 +0100
Message-ID <sIQXg-F4-61@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sIwOR-4kz-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIxBf-4SJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIQaS-9a-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIQud-v5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Scott Kitterman, 2016-11-29]
> Piotr: Is there some language that acknowledges the situation as unusual, even 
> if it doesn't fully bless it that you'd be comfortable with in policy so we 
> can at least document current practice?

if module name is foo, name of the binary package should be python3-foo,
not python3-bar-foo. There is no change needed on the upstream side or
in django/__init__.py - it's just about naming binary packages the way
our policy recommends. Adjusting policy to document good changes we came
up in practice is good. Documenting bad ones is not.

That said, I don't have a veto vote so I will just have to deal with it.
-- 
Piotr Ożarowski                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl          www.griffith.cc           www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Binary naming for Django Related Packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-11-28 17:20 +0100
  Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 17:40 +0100
    Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 18:00 +0100
      Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 13:50 +0100
    Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-12-03 17:10 +0100
      Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2016-12-03 17:50 +0100
  Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2016-11-28 17:50 +0100
  Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 18:00 +0100
    Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-11-28 18:10 +0100
      Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 14:00 +0100
        Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-11-29 14:20 +0100
          Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 14:50 +0100
            Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-11-30 06:20 +0100
              Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-12-07 11:50 +0100
                Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2017-01-18 07:50 +0100
                Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2017-01-18 10:50 +0100
  Re: Binary naming for Django Related Packages Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-12-03 17:10 +0100

csiph-web