Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9078

Re: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance

Path csiph.com!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Re: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance
Date Sat, 10 Dec 2016 08:40:02 +0100
Message-ID <sMKqe-67B-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sLIqz-7Qr-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sMCCl-XS-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Dec 10 07:32:20 2016
Old-Return-Path <andreas@an3as.eu>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.211 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.311] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -6.1
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
User-Agent Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14428
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20161210073204.GB9373@an3as.eu
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 22
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc 846228@bugs.debian.org, Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
X-Original-Date Sat, 10 Dec 2016 08:32:04 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <20161210073204.GB9373@an3as.eu>
X-Original-References <20161207110956.GC2311@an3as.eu> <c74f48ff-5094-769d-c56c-02e334fe2f97@bzed.de>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9078 linux.debian.bugs.dist:789696

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:09:55AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > I think python-joblib has several rdepends and thus it would IMHO be
> > better maintained in DPMT than in a private Github repository.  What
> > do you think?
> 
> On the other side, DPMT is nothing to drop packages one does not want to
> maintain anymore into....
> DPMT makes various things easier, like mass migrations, but there are no
> random maintainers popping up to handle your package!

I can confirm that I would pop up in cases where I would feel able to
fix a bug in my rdepends if it is in a team maintained repository I have
easy access.  Using third party repositories has several other
disadvantages - for instance Debian maintainers dashboard can't verify
Vcs status.

Kind regards

       Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2016-12-10 08:40 +0100

csiph-web