Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9078 > unrolled thread

Re: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance

Started byAndreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
First post2016-12-10 08:40 +0100
Last post2016-12-10 08:40 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2016-12-10 08:40 +0100

#9078 — Re: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance

FromAndreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Date2016-12-10 08:40 +0100
SubjectRe: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance
Message-ID<sMKqe-67B-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:09:55AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > I think python-joblib has several rdepends and thus it would IMHO be
> > better maintained in DPMT than in a private Github repository.  What
> > do you think?
> 
> On the other side, DPMT is nothing to drop packages one does not want to
> maintain anymore into....
> DPMT makes various things easier, like mass migrations, but there are no
> random maintainers popping up to handle your package!

I can confirm that I would pop up in cases where I would feel able to
fix a bug in my rdepends if it is in a team maintained repository I have
easy access.  Using third party repositories has several other
disadvantages - for instance Debian maintainers dashboard can't verify
Vcs status.

Kind regards

       Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web