Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9078 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-10 08:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-10 08:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2016-12-10 08:40 +0100
| From | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-10 08:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Random FTBFS failures of joblib and what about team maintenance |
| Message-ID | <sMKqe-67B-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:09:55AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > I think python-joblib has several rdepends and thus it would IMHO be
> > better maintained in DPMT than in a private Github repository. What
> > do you think?
>
> On the other side, DPMT is nothing to drop packages one does not want to
> maintain anymore into....
> DPMT makes various things easier, like mass migrations, but there are no
> random maintainers popping up to handle your package!
I can confirm that I would pop up in cases where I would feel able to
fix a bug in my rdepends if it is in a team maintained repository I have
easy access. Using third party repositories has several other
disadvantages - for instance Debian maintainers dashboard can't verify
Vcs status.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web