Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8543

Re: python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.glorb.com!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review
Date Sat, 21 May 2016 10:50:01 +0200
Message-ID <rBaLD-1id-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rzFTz-qJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rAuCK-7Be-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <rAz9n-2ay-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat May 21 08:48:16 2016
Old-Return-Path <mitya57@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12.149 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight DYN_NJABL=ERR(0) NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=ERR(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-lf0-f67.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pPaXEtDA6RJ9KFrHa3NHtIo2d5SUM+JY6f5WfYISBzM=; b=RLwVZBU/6l7hI0noyMUxH+wKiQXKcMKON3Xy/RsBUgXcVqwdgD0qs2ToAOJkodyQcE qBpp7+VqrsOmmkBr1i6j7ACTW2urYEAuRPla+49ixeb61ZzUHzIOk1ezc+tYtgWh74wS LPA07IOVGxlYDwec8YCQrELcM3d5yPAtgHnQxQxYzMzR+Go/hDPPXND8rwtRw9GDcE3Y zxvxhw0zabxgOZ+XdF/D+Fnoy1D0waCF8y/Y45Rcrtk4JMfTush6Mu8x0krJZ07iBm3S eGcBZmQYA4u3rm/2hVb2PpPzvxI2FERdQvlqHDAtH6XEQOpfhregqFp2HPKpnidqwZ2Z I7Lg==
X-Gm-Message-State ALyK8tKk158XPeWHP9KoGFMsqFqRuPn9eni9drbovNSJkvli5DyhOb/L8kJWrBz8NOFmkA==
X-Received by 10.25.19.70 with SMTP id j67mr4913lfi.44.1463820468066; Sat, 21 May 2016 01:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU"
Content-Disposition inline
User-Agent Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13874
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160521084745.GB8807@mitya57.me
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 68
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sat, 21 May 2016 11:47:45 +0300
X-Original-Message-ID <20160521084745.GB8807@mitya57.me>
X-Original-References <CALdTKe_=E9B7mWy5dYohJ+M3xpgO7zh3PeqvdKRzzhApJ8-oAQ@mail.gmail.com> <1463658117.14890.8.camel@fladi.at> <CALdTKe8My2X8PXN6rw0=m=6RBmRgq84RJUJfZEbCieFXzoMPjg@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8543

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Tiago,

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:19:46PM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
>> - lintian complains about site/js/bootstrap.min.js, AFAIKT the "site"
>> folder  contains the project's website. Maybe you would like to remove
>> it by repacking the source tarball.
>
> There's a patch[1] adding sources for bootstrap CSS/JS minified files,
> but this doesn't makes much sense, right? They aren't included in
> binary, nor the orig source tarball. I can repack it as a
> DSFG-compatible tarball, but would like to receive a second opinion
> about the mentioned patch, confirming if it is really useless.

I think it's better to put the missing sources in debian/missing-sources/
directory rather than patching them in.

(That is also suggested by the Lintian error description[1], and should
make that error disappear.)

[1] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-is-missing.html

>> - It's more accurate to use "Expat" instead of "MIT" in d/copyright.
>
> I respectfully disagree with you at this point, as I had already
> talked about it on "debian-mentors" last month[3]. In this case
> there's even an additional detail: the copyrighted files specifically
> uses the "MIT" name for the license. Using a different name under
> "debian/copyright" would be an inconsistency.

According to the copyright format specification[2]:

| There are many versions[3] of the MIT license. Please use Expat[4] instead,
| when it matches.

[2] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License#Various_versions
[4] http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt

--
Dmitry Shachnev

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review Tiago Ilieve <tiago.myhro@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 07:40 +0200
  Re: python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2016-05-19 13:50 +0200
    Re: python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review Tiago Ilieve <tiago.myhro@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 18:40 +0200
      Re: python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-05-21 10:50 +0200
        Re: python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review Tiago Ilieve <tiago.myhro@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 12:30 +0200
          Re: python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review Tiago Ilieve <tiago.myhro@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 08:20 +0200
            Re: python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-06-01 13:50 +0200
              Re: python-social-auth 0.2.19-1 review Tiago Ilieve <tiago.myhro@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 22:40 +0200

csiph-web