Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8263

Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

flake8 has the most mindshare these days :)
On Mar 2, 2016 7:07 PM, "Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
>
> > Maybe add pylint?
>
> As I understand it:
>
> pylint runs code from the source tree so it isn't suitable for running
> by default as that could be a security issue for people reviewing
> potentially untrusted code.
>
> pylint isn't able to be run automatically, it needs a human to come up
> with the right command-line.
>
> c-a-t-t could certainly print a suggestion to run pylint like it does
> for fuzzers like afl/zzuf.
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>
>

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-02 04:30 +0100
  Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-03-02 05:40 +0100
    Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-02 06:00 +0100
  Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-02 15:20 +0100
    Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-03 01:10 +0100
      Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code "Paul R. Tagliamonte" <paultag@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 01:30 +0100
      Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-03 13:00 +0100
        Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-04 06:10 +0100
          Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-04 10:30 +0100
            Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-04 14:40 +0100
              Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-04 16:20 +0100
                Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-05 04:20 +0100
                Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-05 15:10 +0100
                Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-06 10:20 +0100
  Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-03 01:40 +0100
    Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2016-03-03 01:50 +0100
    Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> - 2016-03-04 15:40 +0100
      Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-05 04:10 +0100
  Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2016-03-03 01:40 +0100

csiph-web