Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8272
| From | Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code |
| Date | 2016-03-04 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8Z3z-85K-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r85E5-1TO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8pt8-7tT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8pt7-7tT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03.03.2016 01:38, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> ... > > All of flake8, hacking, bandit, pep257, clonedigger and more are on > the TODO list: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git/tree/data/python > > FYI pep257 is definitely packaged: > > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=pep257 > >> I can probably think up more that I've used, but the above rise to >> the top of my list. > > More suggestions would be useful but most useful would be actual > tests. They are very simple to add if you know how to run the tools. BTW there's also Prospector which provides a uniform interface to many individual linters: https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/prospector.html Cheers, DS -- 4096R/DF5182C8 http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-02 04:30 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-03-02 05:40 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-02 06:00 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-02 15:20 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-03 01:10 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code "Paul R. Tagliamonte" <paultag@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 01:30 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-03 13:00 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-04 06:10 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-04 10:30 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-04 14:40 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-04 16:20 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-05 04:20 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-05 15:10 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-06 10:20 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-03 01:40 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2016-03-03 01:50 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> - 2016-03-04 15:40 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-05 04:10 +0100
Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2016-03-03 01:40 +0100
csiph-web