Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8272

Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code

From Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code
Date 2016-03-04 15:40 +0100
Message-ID <r8Z3z-85K-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r85E5-1TO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8pt8-7tT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8pt7-7tT-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 03.03.2016 01:38, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> ...
> 
> All of flake8, hacking, bandit, pep257, clonedigger and more are on
> the TODO list:
> 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git/tree/data/python
> 
> FYI pep257 is definitely packaged:
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=pep257
> 
>> I can probably think up more that I've used, but the above rise to
>> the top of my list.
> 
> More suggestions would be useful but most useful would be actual
> tests. They are very simple to add if you know how to run the tools.

BTW there's also Prospector which provides a uniform interface to many individual linters:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/prospector.html

Cheers,
DS

-- 
4096R/DF5182C8
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-02 04:30 +0100
  Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-03-02 05:40 +0100
    Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-02 06:00 +0100
  Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-02 15:20 +0100
    Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-03 01:10 +0100
      Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code "Paul R. Tagliamonte" <paultag@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 01:30 +0100
      Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-03 13:00 +0100
        Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-04 06:10 +0100
          Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-04 10:30 +0100
            Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-04 14:40 +0100
              Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-04 16:20 +0100
                Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-05 04:20 +0100
                Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2016-03-05 15:10 +0100
                Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-06 10:20 +0100
  Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-03 01:40 +0100
    Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2016-03-03 01:50 +0100
    Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> - 2016-03-04 15:40 +0100
      Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2016-03-05 04:10 +0100
  Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2016-03-03 01:40 +0100

csiph-web