Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7734

Re: DPMT Policy

Show key headers only | View raw

[Barry Warsaw, 2015-10-21]
> What I'm trying to express is the team decision (a couple of debconfs ago) for
> pristine-tars rather than releasing from upstream git.  I do want to keep the
> rationale in the policy doc; it's one sentence and it seems to come up often
> enough.  Suggestions for better phrasing welcome!

Only version to version upstream changes should be kept in the repository -
complete upstream git history should be avoided. In order to make it
easier to cherry-pick upstream commits as patches, add remote repository
(example below).
 
  git remote add upstream_repo git://example.com/foo.git
  git fetch upstream_repo
  git-dpm checkout-patched
  git cherry-pick any_upstream_commit
  git-dpm update-patches

> >> +for use with ``pbuilder``, ``sbuild``, etc. or as a binary package directory.
> >
> >gbp can use sbuild/pbuilder, here's my ~/.gbp.conf:
> >
> >  [buildpackage]
> >  builder=sbuild
> 
> This is the kind of thing that should go in the wiki.
> 

I simply suggest to:

s/, either as a source package for use with ``pbuilder``, ``sbuild``, etc. or as a binary package directory/ (it can be configured to use sbuild, pbuilder, etc.)/

or remove this part completely

> >> +Use the following ``git-dpm`` tag formats for the three branches named above.
> >> +Put these lines at the *end* of your ``debian/.git-dpm`` file::
> >> +
> >> +    debianTag="debian/%e%v"
> >> +    patchedTag="patches/%e%v"
> >> +    upstreamTag="upstream/%e%u"
> >
> >I will update `py2dsp --profile dpmt ...` to do that out of the box, but
> >even then, it's better to suggest that tool in the wiki only, I guess
> 
> I think so.  The tag format (and IMHO the mechanism to ensure it) should go in
> policy though.

nothing against this paragraph, just wanted to state that wiki will not have
to mention it if we have a tool that configures new package the way policy wants.

> >I'm wondering about something that bit me recently: `gbp pull` instead
> >of `git pull` - should we put that into policy or is wiki warning enough?
> 
> I think wiki is enough. It is possible to operate with just straight `git
> pull` because it will still fetch all commits, but when you switch to one of
> the other branches, you'll see that its head is out of date, and git will
> prompt you to pull in that branch to update it.  `gbp pull` is mostly
> convenience.

gbp buildpackage will fail if you never switched to pristine-tar (and
git didn't warn you about new commits). It wasn't obvious to me why
it fails when it hit me for the first time.
-- 
Piotr Ożarowski                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl          www.griffith.cc           www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-19 19:40 +0200
  Re: Python Policy Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-19 20:50 +0200
  Re: Python Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-19 21:10 +0200
    Re: Python Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-19 21:30 +0200
      Re: Python Policy Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-10-19 21:40 +0200
        Re: Python Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-19 21:50 +0200
    Re: Python Policy Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 00:30 +0200
      Re: Python Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 00:40 +0200
        Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 16:50 +0200
          Re: Python Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 17:10 +0200
    Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 16:40 +0200
      Re: Python Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 17:00 +0200
  Re: Python Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-19 23:30 +0200
    Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 16:30 +0200
      Re: Python Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 17:20 +0200
        Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 22:20 +0200
    Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 23:00 +0200
      Re: Python Policy IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 23:10 +0200
        Re: Python Policy Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-10-21 02:20 +0200
          Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-21 02:50 +0200
          Re: Python Policy IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-10-21 10:00 +0200
            Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-21 16:00 +0200
              Re: Python Policy IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-10-22 11:30 +0200
                Re: DPMT Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-22 11:40 +0200
                Re: DPMT Policy IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-10-22 12:30 +0200
      Re: Python Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 23:40 +0200
        Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-21 03:00 +0200
          Re: Python Policy Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2015-10-21 10:40 +0200
            Re: Python Policy Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> - 2015-10-21 11:50 +0200
              PyPI wheels (was Re: Python Policy) Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-21 16:00 +0200
                Re: PyPI wheels (was Re: Python Policy) Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmingov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 16:50 +0200
                Re: PyPI wheels (was Re: Python Policy) Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2015-10-21 17:50 +0200
            Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-21 15:50 +0200
          Re: DPMT Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-21 14:10 +0200
            Re: DPMT Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-21 15:50 +0200
              Re: DPMT Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-21 16:20 +0200
                Re: DPMT Policy Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-10-21 23:40 +0200
                Re: DPMT Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-22 01:00 +0200
      Re: Python Policy IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-10-22 11:20 +0200
        Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-23 01:40 +0200
      Re: Python Policy IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-10-22 11:20 +0200
        Re: Python Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-23 01:40 +0200
  Re: DPMT Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 00:00 +0200
    Re: DPMT Policy Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 00:30 +0200
    Re: DPMT Policy Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 16:10 +0200
      Re: DPMT Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 17:10 +0200
        Re: DPMT Policy Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 23:40 +0200
  Re: Python Policy Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-10-20 00:00 +0200

csiph-web