Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7311
| Path | csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported |
| Date | Fri, 25 Sep 2015 04:20:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qcqMa-4Jw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q9sKv-8q3-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | 798999@bugs.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Sep 25 02:19:42 2015 |
| Old-Return-Path | <debian@kitterman.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-12.1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=SKIP(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .kitterman. - helo: .mailout03.controlledmail. - helo-domain: .controlledmail.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5 |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=201409; t=1443147565; bh=iIj7zrEIRt2LfBaeQiwRheOd30Epb6XtISEa2lRMWlU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=hIBleeCvuRmqWdNX+e8NVxkQncSQV6sp/lYct8fXS1NIOLw2gOlnI0PRQznSlItUU +UVt2kvhWyqzHZgknMH+5pNawk5hlI4rSowYO3TG7qY1L8vzsQ4jFqYY7AHyJcWxAx 24Cd9YH9rAbV5Fx47AjPM77+Wv9I4qEsi7MM6IxQ= |
| User-Agent | KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-63-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1826925.ZOFqbmBm0I"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/12620 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/1826925.Ct22S5Td6u@kitterma-e6430 |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 80 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 24 Sep 2015 22:19:20 -0400 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <1826925.Ct22S5Td6u@kitterma-e6430> |
| X-Original-References | <68693772.ZjC33q7KA0@kitterma-e6430> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7311 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:43:53 -0400 Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 10:23:19 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > I would appreciate it if you would go ahead and publish it and then with > > > your permission, I'll coordinate binNMUs as I've done in the past for > > > python transitions. > > > > Does https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.5.html look about > > right? I adjusted the build-depend slightly. > > Yes. It looks good. Thanks. > > > There's quite some tangling with g++ stuff at the moment so please hold > > tight for now. Is it feasible to do rebuild tests in experimental ahead of > > time? > > I'm currently focusing on the packages that show up as neither good nor bad > as they are almost inevitably buggy. > > Many of the packages that show up as being tangled with g++ actually aren't > since they've already been rebuilt and transitioned to testing. I will, of > course, hold off and try and get a better picture of how much overlap there > really is. I've now reviewed the potential for entanglement between doing this python3.5 transition and the ongoing gcc5 transition. I reviewed the packages listed on the transition tracker as being affected by both transitions, reduced the list down to the packages that have not already been explicitly transitioned to a v5 or rebuilt for the transition and then examined and/or rebuilt the rest. None of the remaining packages [1] were listed on the titanpad [2] as needing transition nor did rebuilding them show any problems that would indicate a delay to the transition nor any gcc5 transition related issues with the exceptions of pandas and uwsgi, which are unbuildable for other reasons [3][4]. I have the python3-defaults upload to enable python3.5 as a supported python3 version prepared and ready to upload when I get an ack from the release team. I think we are ready to start. Scott K Please CC me on any replies to debian-release as I'm not subscribed. [1] gyoto, libkdtree++, liblinear, matplotlib, pandas, pykde4, pymia, pysubnettree, python-espeak, pyviennacl, uwsgi [2] https://titanpad.com/UtA5km2wW6 [3] #790024, #790924, and #790925 [4] #788957
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> - 2015-09-16 23:30 +0200
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-17 00:00 +0200
Re: Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-25 04:20 +0200
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-26 14:30 +0200
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> - 2015-09-27 16:20 +0200
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-27 16:40 +0200
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Tomasz Rybak <tomasz.rybak@post.pl> - 2015-09-29 22:10 +0200
Status Update For Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-12 16:30 +0200
Re: Status Update For Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> - 2015-10-12 21:30 +0200
Re: Status Update For Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-12 21:40 +0200
csiph-web