Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7311
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported |
| Date | 2015-09-25 04:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qcqMa-4Jw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q9sKv-8q3-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:43:53 -0400 Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 10:23:19 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > I would appreciate it if you would go ahead and publish it and then with > > > your permission, I'll coordinate binNMUs as I've done in the past for > > > python transitions. > > > > Does https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.5.html look about > > right? I adjusted the build-depend slightly. > > Yes. It looks good. Thanks. > > > There's quite some tangling with g++ stuff at the moment so please hold > > tight for now. Is it feasible to do rebuild tests in experimental ahead of > > time? > > I'm currently focusing on the packages that show up as neither good nor bad > as they are almost inevitably buggy. > > Many of the packages that show up as being tangled with g++ actually aren't > since they've already been rebuilt and transitioned to testing. I will, of > course, hold off and try and get a better picture of how much overlap there > really is. I've now reviewed the potential for entanglement between doing this python3.5 transition and the ongoing gcc5 transition. I reviewed the packages listed on the transition tracker as being affected by both transitions, reduced the list down to the packages that have not already been explicitly transitioned to a v5 or rebuilt for the transition and then examined and/or rebuilt the rest. None of the remaining packages [1] were listed on the titanpad [2] as needing transition nor did rebuilding them show any problems that would indicate a delay to the transition nor any gcc5 transition related issues with the exceptions of pandas and uwsgi, which are unbuildable for other reasons [3][4]. I have the python3-defaults upload to enable python3.5 as a supported python3 version prepared and ready to upload when I get an ack from the release team. I think we are ready to start. Scott K Please CC me on any replies to debian-release as I'm not subscribed. [1] gyoto, libkdtree++, liblinear, matplotlib, pandas, pykde4, pymia, pysubnettree, python-espeak, pyviennacl, uwsgi [2] https://titanpad.com/UtA5km2wW6 [3] #790024, #790924, and #790925 [4] #788957
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> - 2015-09-16 23:30 +0200
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-17 00:00 +0200
Re: Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-25 04:20 +0200
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-26 14:30 +0200
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> - 2015-09-27 16:20 +0200
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-09-27 16:40 +0200
Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Tomasz Rybak <tomasz.rybak@post.pl> - 2015-09-29 22:10 +0200
Status Update For Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-12 16:30 +0200
Re: Status Update For Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> - 2015-10-12 21:30 +0200
Re: Status Update For Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-10-12 21:40 +0200
csiph-web