Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7299
| From | Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules |
| Date | 2015-09-19 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qatl7-6Oz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qakhP-29v-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qaldT-3Av-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | The Organization of Unorganized Woozalists |
On Sep 19, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: >By the way, I am also upstream for flit, and I'm prepared to help build >some tooling to use it for distro packaging. I know it will cause some >inconvenience in the short term because there's infrastructure around >setup.py packaging, but ultimately I think that having declarative >metadata should be an advantage. There have been countless attempts at moving the Python packaging infrastructure to a declarative syntax over the years. I remember talking to Tarek at a Pycon *many* years ago about this. Maybe this time it'll catch on. :) flit doesn't build sdists, so I guess the current toolchain which starts with .orig.tar.gz won't work with flitted packages. The README says: "People may also want a traditional sdist for other reasons, such as Linux distro packaging. I hope that these problems will diminsh over time." I'm not sure which problem you hope will diminish! People wanting traditional sdists, the problem of Linux distro packaging <wink> or needing sdists for downstream consumers like Debian. OTOH, as wheels get more popular for upstream package distributions, I do think we need a good story for turning wheels into debs. There's some work ongoing to turn debs back into wheels: https://github.com/paulproteus/dirtbike Cheers, -Barry
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2015-09-19 09:00 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Thomas Kluyver <takluyver@fastmail.com> - 2015-09-19 10:00 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2015-09-19 10:10 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Thomas Kluyver <takluyver@fastmail.com> - 2015-09-19 13:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-09-19 18:40 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Thomas Kluyver <takluyver@fastmail.com> - 2015-09-20 13:10 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2015-09-24 12:40 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk> - 2015-09-24 13:20 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2015-09-26 01:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2015-09-26 01:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-09-26 02:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2015-09-26 05:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2015-09-28 00:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2015-09-26 11:40 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2015-09-26 17:20 +0200
csiph-web