Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7294
| From | Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules |
| Date | 2015-09-19 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qalnz-42C-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qakhP-29v-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qaldT-3Av-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, Le samedi 19 sept. 2015 à 00:35:49 (-0700), Thomas Kluyver a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015, at 11:56 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > > here is a new way to package modules for Python: > > https://github.com/takluyver/flit > > > > It means that something packaged using it doesn't use a setup.py or some > > such, but a flit.ini ; see for example: > > https://github.com/jupyter/testpath > > > > I'm not sure how to package something like this (and testpath is a > > depends for IPython's tests), so I think asking here is better. > > By the way, I am also upstream for flit, and I'm prepared to help build > some tooling to use it for distro packaging. I know it will cause some > inconvenience in the short term because there's infrastructure around > setup.py packaging, but ultimately I think that having declarative > metadata should be an advantage. > > Thomas > Yes, you're also upstream for ptyprocess and terminado :-P I have nothing against declarative -- it's just that I suspect we will need something like a --buildsystem=flit or some such, and I have no clue how to do something like this... Snark on #debian-python
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2015-09-19 09:00 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Thomas Kluyver <takluyver@fastmail.com> - 2015-09-19 10:00 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@laposte.net> - 2015-09-19 10:10 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Thomas Kluyver <takluyver@fastmail.com> - 2015-09-19 13:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-09-19 18:40 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Thomas Kluyver <takluyver@fastmail.com> - 2015-09-20 13:10 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2015-09-24 12:40 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk> - 2015-09-24 13:20 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2015-09-26 01:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2015-09-26 01:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-09-26 02:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2015-09-26 05:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2015-09-28 00:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2015-09-26 11:40 +0200
Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> - 2015-09-26 17:20 +0200
csiph-web