Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7162
| From | Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! |
| Date | 2015-08-07 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pUR86-2r6-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pUqUi-6vT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUCC6-6KD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUNea-5gC-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUO0y-6r7-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | The Organization of Unorganized Woozalists |
On Aug 07, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: >To avoid quilt(1), I use "gbp pq" instead. What I commit to git as a >result interoperates with quilt(1), in the sense that someone like >Sandro could clone one of my repositories, manipulate the patch queue >with quilt(1), and not have to know or care that I used gbp pq; and I >could work with one of Sandro's repositories with gbp pq, without having >to deal with quilt. That seems like a nice property to have. I really wish git-pq and git-dpm could interoperate, then it really wouldn't matter which the patch management tool was chosen. Unfortunately, unless things have changed in the last year, I don't think that's the case. Cheers, -Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150807104421.016c30b1@limelight.wooz.org
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-08-06 12:50 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-08-07 01:20 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-08-07 12:40 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2015-08-07 13:30 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-08-07 16:50 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-08-07 15:20 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-08-07 15:40 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-08-07 16:30 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-08-07 19:00 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2015-08-15 20:30 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-08-17 17:20 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2015-08-17 18:00 +0200
Re: so you want to migrate DPMT/PAPT to git? look at what pgk-perl did! Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2015-08-07 16:10 +0200
csiph-web