Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17051

Re: Debian Python team: don't use recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead

Path	csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Debian Python team: don't use recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead
Date	Tue, 09 Sep 2025 02:40:01 +0200
Message-ID	<LsUyR-dTZ7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<LouMG-aQ1V-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <Lovpo-aQjG-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Sep 9 00:37:31 2025
Old-Return-Path	<otto@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-109.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Gm-Message-State	AOJu0YxF6tS+qUqz2bc00EaIR1R0G+M0UTD0c5VhqZBNqB2WS9gbyvNg vBe3dwcHMLM+2cBqjcSCYVEmv3w2xIKt0VhDOKHo2t5Djh29wnYA135uyA6iLEwurNjNOHWXgnC wYximrbrmv+n60Z8ottPXtNRXEgtXqME=
X-Google-SMTP-Source	AGHT+IHtYtCQFskBJpvmFgihCVA5GA4N43wttEMk3EZX/G05VPMeguVQ5zIQsuM5GNdY6c/1A9OilTS7r+L3NwYmCNM=
X-Received	by 2002:a05:6102:4b85:b0:519:534a:6c4f with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-53d2434aadbmr3335833137.33.1757378232300; Mon, 08 Sep 2025 17:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID	<CAOU6tADMqDE=tUYdktZ+55J8QpwaoicgKJnRPZB7Q5vr_izaFQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Gm-Features	AS18NWCpxWZ1x09I2doa3CAy_EZmg959z6aAtPAKpoR36dFxz_C_7NE44QPiNzY
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Debian-User	otto
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23231
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAOU6tADMqDE=tUYdktZ+55J8QpwaoicgKJnRPZB7Q5vr_izaFQ@mail.gmail.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	25
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-python@lists.debian.org, Aayush Raj <meet44yu5h@gmail.com>, Jerome Benoit <calculus@rezozer.net>
X-Original-Date	Mon, 8 Sep 2025 17:36:35 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID	<CAOU6tADMqDE=tUYdktZ+55J8QpwaoicgKJnRPZB7Q5vr_izaFQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References	<CAOU6tAD+gTVNnP3wuqFtqqBna7T7O5e0AA9C3LmbVnbEtEyppw@mail.gmail.com> <aK9xsSxV9WfZhEtW@nuc>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17051

Show key headers only | View raw

> > I was looking at which of the Salsa CI jobs take longest and consume
> > most resources and stumbled across
> > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/graph-tool
> >
> > The build uses more memory than available on a Salsa CI runner, and it
> > has never, and will never build.
>
> I don't think that's an accurate way to describe the status of graph-tool.
>
> The problem with graph-tool is that it needs a lot of memory per CPU.
>
> But I managed to make it work in most cases (see the commits and the
> uploads I did) by making some calculations in debian/rules which
> adjust the parallelism according to available memory. If those
> calculations do not work in Salsa CI, we might better figure out why,
> instead of saying "will never build".

Thanks Santiago for the additional information. I updated the MR
description now at
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/graph-tool/-/merge_requests/1,
and I suggest we merge it now to stop CI failures, and re-enable it
later if/when the CI is fixed.

Having a regression testing system that is not passing and cannot
detect any regressions is not productive and wastes resources.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Debian Python team: don't use recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline,  use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 22:20 +0200
  Re: Debian Python team: don't use  recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 22:30 +0200
      Re: Debian Python team: don't use recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline,  use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 22:50 +0200
      Re: Debian Python team: don't use  recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2025-08-28 14:20 +0200
      Re: Debian Python team: don't use  recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-08-28 15:30 +0200
      Re: Debian Python team: don't use recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline,  use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 23:00 +0200
  Re: Debian Python team: don't use  recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 23:00 +0200
    Re: Debian Python team: don't use recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline,  use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 02:40 +0200
      Re: Debian Python team: don't use  recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 03:20 +0200
      Re: Debian Python team: don't use  recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 03:40 +0200
      Re: Debian Python team: don't use  recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline, use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 15:10 +0200
          Re: Debian Python team: don't use recipes/debian.yml@salsa-ci-team/pipeline,  use debian/salsa-ci.yml instead Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-09-09 19:20 +0200

csiph-web