Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16737

Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best packaging practice ?

Path	csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best packaging practice ?
Date	Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:40:01 +0100
Message-ID	<KjsNH-1ths-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<KhBV8-cGY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KhDay-dEJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <KhDtT-dLC-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Feb 23 22:33:01 2025
Old-Return-Path	<julian@d-and-j.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.198 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6
X-Greylist	delayed 2514 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 22:32:46 UTC
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/22843
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Z7uYOSHw5bY8lKsF@d-and-j.net
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	26
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@debian.org>, debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date	Sun, 23 Feb 2025 21:50:49 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<Z7uYOSHw5bY8lKsF@d-and-j.net>
X-Original-References	<26548.58731.571734.173421@rob.eddelbuettel.com> <Z7T5CfnNtak_B8fV@debian> <26548.64929.74712.119971@rob.eddelbuettel.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16737

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi Dirk,

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:37:37PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> 
> Hi Emanuel,
> 
> Thanks for the prompt reply!
> [...]
> | Seems very similar to basemap[0]
> | 
> | [0] https://sources.debian.org/src/basemap/1.4.1-1/
> 
> I may have been unclear in what I was looking for.  If I read this correctly,
> then it "bends" the upstreeam layout to effectively undo the package split?
> 
> I was thinking more along the lines of 'how do I create three binary Python
> packages that are interdependent from one source repo'. Is that doable?

Plausibly, you could do similarly to basemap, but instead of
installing everything into a single package, install it into three
separate packages.  But I haven't worked out the details, and don't
know offhand of any examples.  So feel free to ignore this suggestion!

Best wishes,

   Julian

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best packaging practice ? Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 21:00 +0100
  Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best  packaging practice ? Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 22:20 +0100
    Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best  packaging practice ? Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 22:40 +0100
      Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best  packaging practice ? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2025-02-23 23:40 +0100
      Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best  packaging practice ? Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@debian.org> - 2025-02-25 18:00 +0100
        Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best  packaging practice ? Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2025-02-25 18:30 +0100

csiph-web