Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16722

Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best packaging practice ?

From Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best packaging practice ?
Date 2025-02-18 21:00 +0100
Message-ID <KhBV8-cGY-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi all,

I have long maintained rpy2 (and rpy before) which provides a bridge from
Python to R (which I tend to care more for), and am on friendly terms with
its author. You can see my repo at salsa [1], it is pretty vanilla.

The upcoming upstream release will split into three packages, all in the same
source repo [2]. I am a casual Python user, and not all into packaging there
(source or for Debian). But I can wondering that this arrangement must exist
elsewhere. Is there a good pattern I can borrow to build (and then install ?)
rpy2-interfaces to then build (and install ?) rpy2-objects to then build
rpy2?

Python users see these as independent as they are in three different PyPI
packages.

Is there a best or recommended way to approach this?  CCs welcome, I am not
subscribed to debian-python.

Cheers,  Dirk 


[1] https://salsa.debian.org/edd/rpy2
[2] https://github.com/rpy2/rpy2
-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best packaging practice ? Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 21:00 +0100
  Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best  packaging practice ? Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 22:20 +0100
    Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best  packaging practice ? Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2025-02-18 22:40 +0100
      Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best  packaging practice ? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2025-02-23 23:40 +0100
      Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best  packaging practice ? Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@debian.org> - 2025-02-25 18:00 +0100
        Re: Existing package splits into dependent subpackages -- best  packaging practice ? Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org> - 2025-02-25 18:30 +0100

csiph-web